23 Comments
Nov 15Liked by 2nd Smartest Guy in the World

Dear 2nd, I had a long and enjoyable chat, Monday, with an Aetna representative (he called me, not the other way around) and as we cheerfully discussed this and that, I let him know that a) I would not be taking any vaxxes for the rest of my life and b) had I known 47 years ago. before conception of first child, what I know now, I would never have taken that prophylactic rubella shot (which left me with arthritis in my right thumb, at the age of 27), nor ever allowed any injections into the bodies of my precious children. It was interesting to me that the Aetna rep had no negative reaction whatsoever to my words --in fact, from his laughingly stating "I have to remind you that you are eligible for a flu shot although I know what your response will be", I suspect that he may be a closet supporter. Certainly he admitted that he and his wife prefer to pay for dental coverage outside of Aetna, so they can have free choice of provider.

Expand full comment

I am reading the horrifying vaccine history book " Dissolving Illusions" by Humphries and Bystrianyk right now. We have been duped not just by the past 5 years but for the past 150 years. Please read this book. Yes, the blind " safe and effective" believers will refuse to even consider it. RFKs Fauci book and Turtles All the Way Down are also must reads. No more vaccines for me of any type from now on.

Expand full comment

Dissolving Illusions is an excellent book. Humphries autobiographical book is also worth a look.

Expand full comment

Thank you. Fixed it

Expand full comment

Thanks for the autobiography tip also. I will read it

Expand full comment

I like Dissolving Illusions and other such books that come at the issue of vaccination from this perspective:

A medical professional who received the same training as all others and who was well-respected in his/her field becomes curious about what could be harming his/her patients, looks into the problem deeply and with an open mind, and discovers how wrong the prevailing paradigm is about human health.

Expand full comment
Nov 15Liked by 2nd Smartest Guy in the World

It's all very clear when you know that the Rockefellars established the AMA to create a medical monopoly, and have been behind Pharma's activities for more than a century...

Expand full comment

Conclusion= Doctor Yourself

Expand full comment

Something I've been doing for a long time now. Covid just double underlined that effort on my part and put several exclamation marks at the end.

Expand full comment
Nov 15·edited Nov 15

This is like trying to covert a Muslim to Roman Catholicism. It's impossible. So nice preaching, and I am with you, but the covidians and their disciples would rather commit harakiri than be converted.

Expand full comment

And they are getting Darwin Awards for their efforts...

Expand full comment

Dr. Paul Thomas is the Oregon pediatrician that commissioned the analysis of all his patients, and lost his license as a result. His unvaxxed patients were the healthiest (less visits for illnesses). He just co-authored a new book (w DeeDee Hoover) titled, VAX FACTS available on Dec 10th. He is on a mission to keep educating everyone about this issue.

Expand full comment

DR. MARIAN LADEROUTE SUBSTACK SHEDDING PRESENTATION DATE

The Case for Shedding of Spike mRNA Gene Therapy Products Causing Excess Death Globally

A presentation to the International Conference on Immunology; Rome, Italy November 18 & 19, 2024

https://hervk102.substack.com/p/the-case-for-shedding-of-spike-mrna

Expand full comment

Back in the day the Royal College of Physicians poo-poohed the idea that washing hands before touching a patient was in any way beneficial ... to the patient. And many patients died as a result. Follow the science indeed.

Expand full comment

Yes, there HAVE been studies comparing vaxxed and unvaxxed children. The first I learned of, I found out in about 2018 or so compared one or two thousand fully faxed Dutch children with a similar number of totally unvaxxed. 1. Yes, the vaccines "work"--the vaxxed children had fewer incidences of measles, chicken pox, etc. than unvaxxed. Not 100% effective--nobody said they were 100% effective. 2. Autism was 4-5 times higher in the vaxxed. 3. There were more respiratory illnesses for which there are no vaccines in the jabbed. 4. Overall, the unvaxxed were healthier.

Well, one study of anything proves NOTHING. It is an indication that the study should be repeated. Next year, I learned that the American Homeschool Association did a similar study because homeschools do not have to be jabbed, and many are not. Again, over 1000 kids in each group. Same 4 results, except 7-8 times more autism in the jabbed. Two studies is a heads up, still not proof.

Next year I learned about an Oregon pediatrician who let parents choose whether and which jabs their kids would get. He had the health records of them all, and divided his practice into 4 groups: fully jabbed, mostly jabbed, somewhat jabbed and totally unvaxxed. This gave a new line of evidence: he got essentially the same 4 results with a middle group that was in-between on jabs and results. That is now enough evidence to make continued mandates unconscionable. He was, of course, stripped of his medical license and his practice.

Apparently, there are other studies that have been suppressed because of anti-vax results.

I am a strong anti-vaxxer, and have no more moral right to force my opinions on others than the jabbers have to force their ideas on me. The majority of parents will still want to vax their kids. Freedom reveals the truth when there is also freedom of speech. The state rules should allow parents to choose, with the caveat that unvaxxed children must stay home during any epidemics.

Parents who must decide will often look at the evidence. There may be one or two jabs that do more good than harm, but this will one day be regarded with more sneering and horror than we regard bloodletting and leeches today.

Expand full comment

Why should unvaxxed children stay home during an epidemic? Epidemic of what?

I don't know how you can mandate one thing and not another.

And, I, too, believe in the freedom of choice. I think it is important to acknowledge and respect others beliefs whether I agree with them or not.

Expand full comment

Hi, Judith! There will be a transition period between the present draconian all-must-vax and the future time when nobody vaxxes any more because we all know it's B.S. During that time, the jabbers are mollified by reducing the risks that unvaxxed pose to the jabbed when measles or whatever is "going around." This epidemic rule looks like "common sense" during that time. This epidemic rule is part of treating vaxxers with respect while they remain deluded. It maximizes their freedom and ours during that time.

Expand full comment

Unless you can see yourself as cattle or sheep as the people who manage this world do you will never navigate your way through it, how many times over the preceding years did you hear or read the term herd immunity instead of population immunity? Words have meaning. How many people that visit this site have read " the protocols of the learner elders of zion " I wonder how many of your readers know of its existence. That dreadful document alone is the road map of what has transpired in the past and what is to come in the future its importance by comparison would the Rosetta stone. Should anyone be willfully ignorant not to read it, at least go to protocol 10 and scroll down to near the end and you will read these words " we will make them sick with our inoculations " very pertinent to today's article. You only have to google it.

Expand full comment

Member how the head of Pfizer pushing the "moon shot" mRNA jabs "at the speed of science" holds a DVM (Doctor of Veterinary Medicine) and a PhD in the Biotechnology of Reproduction?

https://www.genesisprize.org/press-center/2022-01-19-jewish-nobel-awarded-to-pfizer-ceo-albert-bourla

Expand full comment

"My only remaining question is a simple one: How do these bastards sleep at night?"

They sleep fine. Sociopaths do not have a conscience. They are all about stepping on and over whoever they feel they must in order to advance themselves. Those of us who do have a conscience, who feel genuine remorse when we have done something that has harmed another, find it difficult to understand these people. How do these bastards sleep at night indeed!

Expand full comment

Thank you for this.

Re: "And they could make a note of the number of vaccinated children who develop serious health problems after vaccination and then compare that number with the incidence of serious health problems among unvaccinated children. What could be easier than that?"

Dr. Paul Thomas did precisely this - and lost his license because of it.

See: https://bretigne.substack.com/p/jeremy-hammonds-the-war-on-informed-b8d?utm_source=publication-search

And: https://bretigne.substack.com/p/dr-paul-thomas-on-the-suspension-566?utm_source=publication-search

Expand full comment

Interesting. Why do you think incidence of whooping cough is rising? My doctor insisted I get a pertussis vax in June. Dr Jen Gunther says don’t listen to anyone who is selling a product because they are profiting. My dentist said I needed an implant but backed off when I questioned it.

Expand full comment

First, Many Thanks for all that You do!!

I haven't seen many talking about this, only one, in fact, but have You looked into this ingredient of the jabs???

TROMETHAMINE

Go to bitchute.com and look up the channel Remarque88 ... Dan's latest video is a compilation of three of his previous videos on this ingredient and it's ALARMINGly interesting!! I'd love to see You do one of Your deep dives on this ... !!!!!!!!!

Expand full comment