- "Space: what was this strange glow seen in the French sky on Thursday night?
Residents of several parts of France witnessed an unusual luminous phenomenon, including a cloud of gas, on Thursday, shortly before 10 p.m. It was actually a SpaceX Falcon 9 rocket stage. Explanations."
1) Almost no-one on sceptical websites thought that what I was saying was true. Either a liar or (somehow) a "larper". Why would I make something like this up? Are most people just nihilists at this point?
2) An absolutely batshit insane event happened and almost no-one saw it (presumably because they are glued to their electrical devices and screens). What does that say about the current state of society?
3) I must be lying because I didn't film it, according to people who are, supposedly, on "our side". Isn't carrying a phone everywhere a massive part of the degeneracy and destruction of civilization? (I think so)
4) Who/what gives Elon Musk the right to permanently vandalize the night sky and also scare the shit out of people with pyrotechnics without any warning of what is going to happen? Didn't they use to do PSAs about this kind of shit?
5) Musk is, in my opinion, a NWO fraud. His companies are all fraudulent Ponzi schemes and he's a transhumanist globalist, designed to be "le based and redpilled" face of the same agenda.
Funny story, I once tweeted at Musk. He said "Send me memes". This was when Tesla was struggling (lol, like it still isn't) and I said something like "Elon, I think you have more important things to do right now, something to do with shareholders and stuff". I was immediately attacked by hundreds of accounts. 30 minutes later, none of those accounts existed, they were all "damage limitation" bots. The idea that Musk isn't protected by twitter is a joke. Please try it yourself and see if you get the same result.
6) I can totally see how the "rods" could be deployed Starlink satellites, because they get released in a stack. But why would the deployment vehicle be so bright?
The explanation in one of the articles I posted above states: "A version confirmed by the specialized site Frontera Espacial (in Spanish), after this glow was observed in Spain. "The second stage of a SpaceX Falcon 9 rocket was seen in the sky of Madrid," he said. The 'cloud' was actually gases emitted by the engine brake to get the object out of its orbit." This deorbiting of the second stage has the function of causing the disintegration of the launcher in the atmosphere, to prevent it from becoming a space waste."
OK, so why were the rods/satellites still moving in perfect formation above the object if the second stage vehicle was falling to Earth? None of this makes any sense.
6) Why I am I completely unable to find any evidence of anyone seeing anything like this before? This isn't the first deployment of Starlink, surely someone might have seen this exact phenomena before last night? I've spent far too much time on this today and I cannot find a scrap of evidence for these claims from previous launches.
7) Why is there absolutely nothing about this in major French MSM, I've never heard of the two websites I linked above before?
Why is there nothing about this in the English-speaking MSM, especially as (obviously) people in the UK saw it as well? Just for reference, there was some meteor/small asteroid that crashed in the West of England last year; some people I know here saw some weird things in the sky (in broad daylight).
I'm only 220 miles from London here as the crow flies, it's obvious a huge number of people in England saw this. This is perfect for the likes of the tabloid media, yet nothing. Why?
"Elon Musk's SpaceX Starlink satellite network 'rapidly' fought off an attempt by Russian attackers to jam the network in Ukraine, the Pentagon has revealed."
I'm sorry, this whole thing stinks. Not buying it. Something is up, I know it.
So, even allowing for the fact that this would send the rocket in completely the wrong direction to be what I saw, if it was a SpaceX launch (it launched from KSC/Cape Caneveral), it must have been seen by people in a lot of Asia, Eastern Europe and then Western Europe. Yet almost nothing in the media.
Something is up mate. Spent a couple of hours watching the SpaceX launch videos from yesterday as well and I don't see anything that could tally with this. What can you even say anymore? A lie, wrapped in propaganda, smothered lovingly with bullshit and gaslighted perfectly in psyop goodness?
"6) I can totally see how the "rods" could be deployed Starlink satellites, because they get released in a stack. But why would the deployment vehicle be so bright?"
- I've seen Starlink satellites after their first deployment, they are the same size as regular stars. These things in the "rod" were absolutely tiny (spitballing, but maybe 20 times smaller than a star, they were barely visible individually). Why would the Starlink satellites be tiny and then "grow" later? If they were in LEO, then why would the "object" appear so large? Is there enough atmosphere in the Thermosphere to allow for the kind of "cloud" that was produced (I don't know but I doubt it very much).
Hi 2ndSG, update to last night's musings/ramblings.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QyXe1qrF4cM
"Weird white ball pushing a cloud across the sky with a small bar a bit above (Not visible on video)" (pretty much my description, right?)
Article with some reasonably good video embeds from twitter: https://www.francetvinfo.fr/sciences/espace/en-images-espace-quelle-etait-cette-etrange-lueur-apercue-dans-le-ciel-francais-jeudi-soir_5095726.html
- "Space: what was this strange glow seen in the French sky on Thursday night?
Residents of several parts of France witnessed an unusual luminous phenomenon, including a cloud of gas, on Thursday, shortly before 10 p.m. It was actually a SpaceX Falcon 9 rocket stage. Explanations."
Another article, not as good as the above: https://www.bienpublic.com/faits-divers-justice/2022/04/22/spacex-un-etage-de-la-fusee-falcon-9-apercue-depuis-le-ciel
OK, my observations about this:
1) Almost no-one on sceptical websites thought that what I was saying was true. Either a liar or (somehow) a "larper". Why would I make something like this up? Are most people just nihilists at this point?
2) An absolutely batshit insane event happened and almost no-one saw it (presumably because they are glued to their electrical devices and screens). What does that say about the current state of society?
3) I must be lying because I didn't film it, according to people who are, supposedly, on "our side". Isn't carrying a phone everywhere a massive part of the degeneracy and destruction of civilization? (I think so)
4) Who/what gives Elon Musk the right to permanently vandalize the night sky and also scare the shit out of people with pyrotechnics without any warning of what is going to happen? Didn't they use to do PSAs about this kind of shit?
5) Musk is, in my opinion, a NWO fraud. His companies are all fraudulent Ponzi schemes and he's a transhumanist globalist, designed to be "le based and redpilled" face of the same agenda.
Funny story, I once tweeted at Musk. He said "Send me memes". This was when Tesla was struggling (lol, like it still isn't) and I said something like "Elon, I think you have more important things to do right now, something to do with shareholders and stuff". I was immediately attacked by hundreds of accounts. 30 minutes later, none of those accounts existed, they were all "damage limitation" bots. The idea that Musk isn't protected by twitter is a joke. Please try it yourself and see if you get the same result.
6) I can totally see how the "rods" could be deployed Starlink satellites, because they get released in a stack. But why would the deployment vehicle be so bright?
The explanation in one of the articles I posted above states: "A version confirmed by the specialized site Frontera Espacial (in Spanish), after this glow was observed in Spain. "The second stage of a SpaceX Falcon 9 rocket was seen in the sky of Madrid," he said. The 'cloud' was actually gases emitted by the engine brake to get the object out of its orbit." This deorbiting of the second stage has the function of causing the disintegration of the launcher in the atmosphere, to prevent it from becoming a space waste."
OK, so why were the rods/satellites still moving in perfect formation above the object if the second stage vehicle was falling to Earth? None of this makes any sense.
6) Why I am I completely unable to find any evidence of anyone seeing anything like this before? This isn't the first deployment of Starlink, surely someone might have seen this exact phenomena before last night? I've spent far too much time on this today and I cannot find a scrap of evidence for these claims from previous launches.
7) Why is there absolutely nothing about this in major French MSM, I've never heard of the two websites I linked above before?
Why is there nothing about this in the English-speaking MSM, especially as (obviously) people in the UK saw it as well? Just for reference, there was some meteor/small asteroid that crashed in the West of England last year; some people I know here saw some weird things in the sky (in broad daylight).
I'm only 220 miles from London here as the crow flies, it's obvious a huge number of people in England saw this. This is perfect for the likes of the tabloid media, yet nothing. Why?
8) Wait, there IS something in the UK tabloid media about Starlink from today! https://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/article-10744069/Elon-Musks-SpaceX-Starlink-rapidly-fought-Russian-jamming-attack-Ukraine.html
Wait? What?
"Elon Musk's SpaceX Starlink satellite network 'rapidly' fought off an attempt by Russian attackers to jam the network in Ukraine, the Pentagon has revealed."
I'm sorry, this whole thing stinks. Not buying it. Something is up, I know it.
fElon Musk pushing the PSYOP-UFO-INVASION-23 now, or is it PSYOP-POWER-GRID-OUTAGE-22?
So many Psyops, so little brains.
Last post on this (unless you have questions :) ). OK so, this is an image that shows the launch azimuth from KSC: https://qph.fs.quoracdn.net/main-qimg-4bd011beea32284fa8dc05e791d843b1-lq
Some nice calculus here if you like such things :) https://www.orbiterwiki.org/wiki/Launch_Azimuth
So, even allowing for the fact that this would send the rocket in completely the wrong direction to be what I saw, if it was a SpaceX launch (it launched from KSC/Cape Caneveral), it must have been seen by people in a lot of Asia, Eastern Europe and then Western Europe. Yet almost nothing in the media.
Something is up mate. Spent a couple of hours watching the SpaceX launch videos from yesterday as well and I don't see anything that could tally with this. What can you even say anymore? A lie, wrapped in propaganda, smothered lovingly with bullshit and gaslighted perfectly in psyop goodness?
Forgot to elaborate on this point:
"6) I can totally see how the "rods" could be deployed Starlink satellites, because they get released in a stack. But why would the deployment vehicle be so bright?"
- I've seen Starlink satellites after their first deployment, they are the same size as regular stars. These things in the "rod" were absolutely tiny (spitballing, but maybe 20 times smaller than a star, they were barely visible individually). Why would the Starlink satellites be tiny and then "grow" later? If they were in LEO, then why would the "object" appear so large? Is there enough atmosphere in the Thermosphere to allow for the kind of "cloud" that was produced (I don't know but I doubt it very much).