First off, all of these social media companies were funded by In-Q-Tel (CIA), created and broken out by they likes of DARPA and DoD, so they are only private to allow for specious justifications.
And don't forget Section 230 which is invalidated if private corps are essentially run by the criminal government agencies like the FBI and CIA.
I disagree. Businesses are subject to law and the law is subject to the Constitution and the Constitution is subject to the Natural Rights I enjoy as a Sovereign Citizen. If the law can be used to compel a Christian baker to bake a cake then it can certainly be used to compel a corporation, particularly ones that purports to be the “new town square”, not to abrogate my God given Rights. (Decidedly NOT my “Constitutional” Rights.)
I would argue that the right to free speech gives me the right to not have my taxpayer money used to block my right to speech, as was done.
First off, all of these social media companies were funded by In-Q-Tel (CIA), created and broken out by they likes of DARPA and DoD, so they are only private to allow for specious justifications.
And don't forget Section 230 which is invalidated if private corps are essentially run by the criminal government agencies like the FBI and CIA.
The are not private companies, they are cover companies for dissemination of State propaganda, tracking, etc.
I disagree. Businesses are subject to law and the law is subject to the Constitution and the Constitution is subject to the Natural Rights I enjoy as a Sovereign Citizen. If the law can be used to compel a Christian baker to bake a cake then it can certainly be used to compel a corporation, particularly ones that purports to be the “new town square”, not to abrogate my God given Rights. (Decidedly NOT my “Constitutional” Rights.)