In most cases, I think the censors had a choice: Censor and get paid or, don't censor and you get unemployment along with an IRS audit. Take your pick. The crime was committed by the feds, not with their 'assets'.
In most cases, I think the censors had a choice: Censor and get paid or, don't censor and you get unemployment along with an IRS audit. Take your pick. The crime was committed by the feds, not with their 'assets'.
As with so much that’s wrong with our situation and “government”, if a small handful push back and stand, they risk a great deal of trouble. But I can’t help but think that if all of us posting our views here and on other alternative resources stood against the government’s obvious unconstitutional laws, actions, EO’s etc, they simply would be powerless to move against all of us. Nullification as the Founders envisioned.
In most cases, I think the censors had a choice: Censor and get paid or, don't censor and you get unemployment along with an IRS audit. Take your pick. The crime was committed by the feds, not with their 'assets'.
As with so much that’s wrong with our situation and “government”, if a small handful push back and stand, they risk a great deal of trouble. But I can’t help but think that if all of us posting our views here and on other alternative resources stood against the government’s obvious unconstitutional laws, actions, EO’s etc, they simply would be powerless to move against all of us. Nullification as the Founders envisioned.