PSYOP-19 junk science policies drove the world mad - Here’s what we always knew about the year of the fake pandemic

As the Cult dials back their PSYOP-19 Depopulation and Control Program, their MSM outlets are now issuing quasi mea culpas from the perpetrators as they prep the normalization of VAIDS, cardiac damage, and all the other upcoming DEATHVAX™ destruction en route to surging all cause mortality increases.

In a recent The Telegraph article entitled Covid made the world go mad – Here’s what we know now about the year of lockdown, which should have read “PSYOP-19 junk science policies drove the world mad - Here’s what we always knew about the year of the fake pandemic”, they quote Prof Mark Woolhouse who was one of psychotic architects of this scam. Woolhouse happens to be a member of the Sage modelling group SPI-M and as an accredited epidemiologist knew from day 1 that a 0.1 micron virion will never be stopped by lockdowns and masks. The science on this dated back decades, with a plethora of research studies to back that up. Woolhouse knew 100% what he and his fellow Cult handled “Trust the Science” conmen “experts” were doing.

And yet they continue pushing their scientific lies:

Isolating symptomatic cases stopped most of the spread,” says Woolhouse. But Covid spreads asymptomatically, too, making eradication effectively impossible.

No, a virus does not and cannot spread asymptomatically. That is impossible as per decades of research. There is to date not a single credible research study establishing that Covid spreads this way.

“We knew from February [2020], never mind March, that the lockdown would not solve the problem. It would simply delay it,” Woolhouse says, a note of enduring disbelief in his voice. And yet in government, “there was no attention paid to that rather obvious drawback of the strategy”.

Therefore, Woolhouse and the rest of his SPI-M modeling group “expert” colleagues did not speak out for over a year as they watched on while society all around them was being decimated by their fraudulent policies. That makes them ALL Crimes Against Humanity accomplices twice over.

So who is really running PSYOP-19 according to this hack article?

Instead, lockdowns – which “only made sense in the context of eradication” – became the tool of choice to control Covid. The die was cast in China, which instituted ultra-strict measures and, unforgivably in Woolhouse’s book, was praised by the World Health Organisation for its “bold approach”. “The WHO,” he suggests, “got the biggest calls completely wrong in 2020. The early global response to the pandemic was woefully inadequate.”

The WHO is Cult run via Bill Gates’ “donations” which are mainly stolen from taxpayers via his “non-profit” money laundering operations, his BigPharma investing windfalls as subsidized by debt-slave tax mules (ie taxpayers) via the NIH and “free” Death Injections made possible by violence (ie taxes). And of course they reference China, because, ya know, it’s all Putin’s fault, and of course “climate change”. No, the technofascist “futurists” running PSYOP-19 knew EXACTLY what lockdowns would do, just as they knew what Modified mRNA injections would do; to wit:

Watching on, the rest of the world found itself following the same template, even though no work had been done to assess the costs of lockdowns.

The rest of the Cult run world were forced to follow Dr. Mengele 2.0 and his “science” straight into a permanently and semi-permanently traumatized by mass induced hypochondria psychosis society. Or the ideal path to the implementation of social credit score post-human hell on earth that the likes of Klaus Schwab have been salivating over for decades.

Some more disgusting comedy from this article:

Even today, Woolhouse says, from his office at the University of Edinburgh: “I don’t have a good answer for you. It was a frustration from the beginning.”

All this despite a report on lockdown’s wider consequences sent to Sage by the Office for National Statistics as early as April 2020, assessing how many years of quality life would be lost to lockdowns. The best guess was that suppressing the virus would cost three times more years than the disease itself.

“I heard [the official] argument caricatured as: everyone died, but at least no one was saved unfairly,” notes Woolhouse. Policy became a form of epidemiological communism, with imposed equality, even if it was equality of misery. “BBC News backed up this misperception by regularly reporting rare tragedies involving low-risk individuals as if they were the norm,” notes Woolhouse.

Risk/reward and cost/benefit analyses be damned here. These people are criminals. Do not fall for their cheap apologies. They must ALL be held accountable.

It took this Woolhouse well over a year to formulate the concluding paragraph of this pathetic article:

As he freely admits, the question that matters most now is: “How do we not do that in future?”

Allow me to answer his question: we will not do that in the future because PSYOP-CYBER-WAR-22 and whichever other false flag scams the Cabal will try in order to “deconstruct” society even more into a hyper “democracy” or One World governance ushering in the transhumanist social credit score for the remaining un-depopulated cis, trans, nonbinary indoctrinated human slaves.

Comply and WE Die.