I do not now how extensive the atmospheric spraying is in other parts of the world but I can speak from experience with regards to BC and Ontario in Canada. Spraying is heavy here and in BC and based on my time hiking in the mountains and northern forests I can say that it seems that agricultural areas are targeted significantly more than non-agricultural areas.
I highly doubt that very many people funding these operations are convinced that the programs are for reflecting sunlight to fight global warming. The propaganda on that front is super thin and flimsy. I personally do not buy the carbon-centric anthropogenic "global warming narrative", however, if any of those people who are funding these "sustainable development" schemes had a rudimentary ecological awareness and a serious concern about greenhouses gasses or warming climate/droughts they would be planting Douglas Fir, Western red cedar, Eastern Hemlock, Redwoods and other long lived trees (which store massive amounts of CO-2 for centuries to millennia, moderate climate extremes and create stable rain patterns). If there are people that actually think spraying nano-particles of metal and other chemicals into the atmosphere is going to help our climate or biosphere they are idiots.
No, I think the majority of people who are funding and making decisions on these projects are spraying that material mainly for reasons that are unrelated to mitigating solar radiation from reaching the Earth (though crippling some people’s access to full solar UV may be seen as a tertiary “bonus effect” for them).
Agreed.
I outline the main reasons why our weather and hydrological cycle is so erratic in this post:
https://gavinmounsey.substack.com/p/are-there-limits-to-growth?
Also, we need to stop those who are spraying nano-particulates into the atmosphere (geoengineering).
"UN Supervillains Threaten to Dim the Sun" : https://corbettreport.com/nwnw511/
I do not now how extensive the atmospheric spraying is in other parts of the world but I can speak from experience with regards to BC and Ontario in Canada. Spraying is heavy here and in BC and based on my time hiking in the mountains and northern forests I can say that it seems that agricultural areas are targeted significantly more than non-agricultural areas.
For some pics: https://archive.org/details/6.jpgsef
I highly doubt that very many people funding these operations are convinced that the programs are for reflecting sunlight to fight global warming. The propaganda on that front is super thin and flimsy. I personally do not buy the carbon-centric anthropogenic "global warming narrative", however, if any of those people who are funding these "sustainable development" schemes had a rudimentary ecological awareness and a serious concern about greenhouses gasses or warming climate/droughts they would be planting Douglas Fir, Western red cedar, Eastern Hemlock, Redwoods and other long lived trees (which store massive amounts of CO-2 for centuries to millennia, moderate climate extremes and create stable rain patterns). If there are people that actually think spraying nano-particles of metal and other chemicals into the atmosphere is going to help our climate or biosphere they are idiots.
No, I think the majority of people who are funding and making decisions on these projects are spraying that material mainly for reasons that are unrelated to mitigating solar radiation from reaching the Earth (though crippling some people’s access to full solar UV may be seen as a tertiary “bonus effect” for them).