I happen to work on the exact RADAR system Dane claims is controlling weather, so let me include some context for the amount of power put into the atmosphere (which is very small). The system puts out a pulse width of 1.57 microseconds or 4.71 microseconds respective if looking for precip or clear air events. Peak power is 700 Kilowatts …
I happen to work on the exact RADAR system Dane claims is controlling weather, so let me include some context for the amount of power put into the atmosphere (which is very small). The system puts out a pulse width of 1.57 microseconds or 4.71 microseconds respective if looking for precip or clear air events. Peak power is 700 Kilowatts but the on time ratio of that is very small. For instance, at a pulse recurrence frequency of 321 pulses per second with a pulse width of 1.57 microseconds (which is used during precip events like hurricanes) the system is only transmitting for 1.814292 seconds per hour. For the math 321 X .00000157=.00050397 so active transmission is 503.97 microseconds every second. .00050397 X 60=.0302382 so active transmission is 30.2382 milliseconds per minute. Thusly, .0302382 X 60=1.814292 or 1.814292 seconds per hour. The amount of actual average power put into the atmosphere no where near enough to influence temperature of air masses or air currents even if seeded with some electrically conductive material (which by the way would most likely be cased in moisture, frozen over in the upper atmosphere and dropped as hail long before it could influence anything).
Also, any Radar spends most of it's life listening not transmitting. The NEXRAD has an effective range of 240 nautical miles. RF moves one nautical mile out and back in a time of 12.36 microseconds or .00001236 seconds. So in order to "see" 240 nauts in a single radial the system must listen for at least 2.9664 milliseconds or 2966.4 microseconds .0029664 seconds. This also does not include time for processing and digitizing returns.
Could there be other means to control the weather, sure there could. I have an open mind which is why I read this substack and TLAV and others. Chem trails, haarp and such are not my area of expertise but radar is. So I can say with maximum surety that Dane has no clue what he is talking about when it comes to Nexrad.
If there are nanoparticles and various other aerosolized compounds in vicinity, then NEXRAD's seemingly tiny transmissions will in fact influence surrounding weather patterns.
Thanks for the detailed response. It could also be there using harp, 5G amplification, DEW and lasers and combination with the NexRad if that’s the case, then is it possible that any NEXRAD actually be Weaponized?
If there are nanoparticles and various other aerosolized compounds in vicinity, then NEXRAD's seemingly tiny transmissions will in fact influence surrounding weather patterns.
Yes, NEXRAD can be weaponized. Just because a technician works on them does not mean they understand the complex interactions of these and other components of weather warfare.
Also, any kind of large scale project that the govt wants to keep classified & secret from the public, has compartmentalized tasks within the agency or company that was under contract. In this way, 1 team would not know what another one was working on.
Well as 2SG says below is it possible yes. Is it probable? That I would question. Things to think about in that respect. The Nexrad antenna is constantly rotating at speeds between 5 degrees a second up to 36 degrees a second, depending on mode (clear air is very slow, precipitation mode is very fast). The antenna also moves in elevation starting at .5 degrees and going up in increments up to 19.5 degrees. What I am trying to say is that the system is never pointed at a single spot. Antenna control is automated based on volume coverage pattern selected by operations personnel. There is no way to over ride that unless a technician is present at the site.
Also power output is a manual adjustment made by technician, meaning there is no way to increase or decrease power on the fly. There is no centralized control structure for the 159 Nexrads globally. Each is control by a weather forecast office or, in the case of some on foreign soil, military personnel. Not a single Nexrad is connected to the internet. The raw products produced by the radar go to a products generator via T1 or Fiber link. The products generator makes these available to a display system that then makes the products available to the public. So as of now, there is not a way for a nefarious third party to hijack control of these systems.
If I were to wonder the path of a Gulf generated hurricane once it makes land fall on the continental United States, I would superimpose the jet stream over CONUS while looking at that path. The jet stream moves from west to east over the CONUS all day, everyday. Any storm moving moving from south to north, coming from south of the jet stream will either break up or move east once encountering the jet stream.
If one could generate a storm in the right spot, knowing it will move north from there and knowing the path of the jet stream, once would need no other means of predicting where it would end up. The only uncertainty would be whether it would break up or move east.
I happen to work on the exact RADAR system Dane claims is controlling weather, so let me include some context for the amount of power put into the atmosphere (which is very small). The system puts out a pulse width of 1.57 microseconds or 4.71 microseconds respective if looking for precip or clear air events. Peak power is 700 Kilowatts but the on time ratio of that is very small. For instance, at a pulse recurrence frequency of 321 pulses per second with a pulse width of 1.57 microseconds (which is used during precip events like hurricanes) the system is only transmitting for 1.814292 seconds per hour. For the math 321 X .00000157=.00050397 so active transmission is 503.97 microseconds every second. .00050397 X 60=.0302382 so active transmission is 30.2382 milliseconds per minute. Thusly, .0302382 X 60=1.814292 or 1.814292 seconds per hour. The amount of actual average power put into the atmosphere no where near enough to influence temperature of air masses or air currents even if seeded with some electrically conductive material (which by the way would most likely be cased in moisture, frozen over in the upper atmosphere and dropped as hail long before it could influence anything).
Also, any Radar spends most of it's life listening not transmitting. The NEXRAD has an effective range of 240 nautical miles. RF moves one nautical mile out and back in a time of 12.36 microseconds or .00001236 seconds. So in order to "see" 240 nauts in a single radial the system must listen for at least 2.9664 milliseconds or 2966.4 microseconds .0029664 seconds. This also does not include time for processing and digitizing returns.
Could there be other means to control the weather, sure there could. I have an open mind which is why I read this substack and TLAV and others. Chem trails, haarp and such are not my area of expertise but radar is. So I can say with maximum surety that Dane has no clue what he is talking about when it comes to Nexrad.
Also if you would like to see the live radar map of the conus here it is https://atlas.niu.edu/analysis/radar/CONUS/usradsmall_b.loop.gif
You will see the "blue flashes" are there all the time. These are simply low level returns.
If there are nanoparticles and various other aerosolized compounds in vicinity, then NEXRAD's seemingly tiny transmissions will in fact influence surrounding weather patterns.
Thanks for the detailed response. It could also be there using harp, 5G amplification, DEW and lasers and combination with the NexRad if that’s the case, then is it possible that any NEXRAD actually be Weaponized?
If there are nanoparticles and various other aerosolized compounds in vicinity, then NEXRAD's seemingly tiny transmissions will in fact influence surrounding weather patterns.
Yes, NEXRAD can be weaponized. Just because a technician works on them does not mean they understand the complex interactions of these and other components of weather warfare.
Also, any kind of large scale project that the govt wants to keep classified & secret from the public, has compartmentalized tasks within the agency or company that was under contract. In this way, 1 team would not know what another one was working on.
Well as 2SG says below is it possible yes. Is it probable? That I would question. Things to think about in that respect. The Nexrad antenna is constantly rotating at speeds between 5 degrees a second up to 36 degrees a second, depending on mode (clear air is very slow, precipitation mode is very fast). The antenna also moves in elevation starting at .5 degrees and going up in increments up to 19.5 degrees. What I am trying to say is that the system is never pointed at a single spot. Antenna control is automated based on volume coverage pattern selected by operations personnel. There is no way to over ride that unless a technician is present at the site.
Also power output is a manual adjustment made by technician, meaning there is no way to increase or decrease power on the fly. There is no centralized control structure for the 159 Nexrads globally. Each is control by a weather forecast office or, in the case of some on foreign soil, military personnel. Not a single Nexrad is connected to the internet. The raw products produced by the radar go to a products generator via T1 or Fiber link. The products generator makes these available to a display system that then makes the products available to the public. So as of now, there is not a way for a nefarious third party to hijack control of these systems.
If I were to wonder the path of a Gulf generated hurricane once it makes land fall on the continental United States, I would superimpose the jet stream over CONUS while looking at that path. The jet stream moves from west to east over the CONUS all day, everyday. Any storm moving moving from south to north, coming from south of the jet stream will either break up or move east once encountering the jet stream.
If one could generate a storm in the right spot, knowing it will move north from there and knowing the path of the jet stream, once would need no other means of predicting where it would end up. The only uncertainty would be whether it would break up or move east.
This is, of course, just my conjecture.