This Substack perfectly predicted weeks ago that Tucker Carlson post his FOX News firing would ultimately join forces with Elon Musk on a new news show:
“The CEO of the U.S.-based Telsa car manufacturer has admitted to involvement in what President Morales has referred to as a “Lithium Coup”.
“We will coup whoever we want! Deal with it.” was Elon Musk’s response to an accusation on twitter that the U.S. government organized a coup against President Evo Morales, so that Musk could obtain Bolivia’s lithium.”
“After Bolivia, Elon Musk says capitalists can overthrow any government they want”
Space X is a joke that uses a smoothed out version of antiquated tech with it’s roots in the 20-s.
Elon’s rocket-based craft that he uses to get into orbit are essentially just a more streamlined version of Wernher von Braun’s invention from 100 years ago. For those that do not know, Von Braun was the father of German rocket science. He invented the V-2 rockets, the missiles the Nazis launched toward England in the final months of World War II. He was also one of the Nazi’s brought over in operation paperclip.
So if Elon is so smart why is he using such archaic tech to get into space? Surely you do not think that controlled petroleum explosions are the best idea our brightest minds could come up with for propulsion systems in the last 100 years? Of course not, as early as around the same time Wernher von Braun was inventing his rocket systems for the nazis, others (like Dr. Kowsky and T. Townsend Brown) were dabbling in mass cancellation technology (Electrogravitics or what pop culture often describes as “anti-gravity”) for propulsion.
These types of propulsion systems (sometimes using harmonic resonance, acoustic levitation, high voltage systems and/or rotating ferro-fluids) were studied extensively in the open up until the early 50-s. Serious funding and studies were done. The subject of Electrogravitics can be found in prominent military R&D journals up until about 1954, at which point the whole subject goes dark and disappears off the radar. This was not due to failure, this was due to success, overwhelming and ground breaking success (using a variety of methods). I will provide documentation and additional evidence in subsequent comments for anyone that is curious to learn more.
Are rockets really the best he can do? Or it is just that the really efficient and groundbreaking tech is only used in classified military applications?
The real leading edge energy and propulsion tech that corporations like Raytheon or BAE (or Battelle, S.A.I.C., Booz-Allen and Hamilton, Inc, EG&G, Rockwell International etc) are working on would put both the oil and lithium cartels out of business and totally dismantle the energy cartel's monopoly, thus, front men and frauds like Musk are let loose to dance on the stage and convince those that do not know better that he is a cool, smart "green" billionaire bringing "innovation" and "freedom of speech" to the masses. People are easily duped.
Electromagnetic Lifter Technology (Electrogravitics) is technology that was developed by a brilliant mathematician and physicist who has elucidated the fundamental relationship between electromagnetism, magnetic fields and mass and gravity. Essentially, this technology (having been developed to the level of a proof of principle system as early as 8 decades ago) allows for a reduction in mass, allowing for lift. The principles allow for creating extremely efficient energy generation systems as well as advanced aerospace applications. Examples and scientific background of this technology have been described by Valone (1994, 2004), Cameron (2001), LaViolette (2008), and Loder (2002).
– Valone, T. (2004). Electrogravitics II: Validating reports on a new propulsion methodology. Beltsville,
In the highly classified aerospace industry, such flying devices were dubbed ‘Flux Liners’ because they used the Quantum Vacuum Flux field to provide energy and propulsion. The early Aerospace prototypes used only a 24-volt marine battery as a power-up system, after which the device went ‘over unity’, drawing its power from the Quantum Vacuum of space. Later (once the military got their hands on downed exotic space craft) they used back engineering in combination with what they had learned from the human inventors above to create more efficient and powerful prototypes. One such iteration was called the “A.R.V.”. My research and sources indicate that effective gravity control technology was mastered in covert military R&D programs as of October of 1954. Significant improvements, augmentations and refinement has occurred since then, resulting in a wide array of craft being manufactured in compartmented military contracts (USAPs).
In 1927 an article was published in German journal, describing research experiments by Prof. Kowsky and his engineer Mr. Frost. They discovered that if they placed a quartz crystal inside a metal box and treated it with high-powered radio waves the crystal expanded and caused the whole apparatus weighing 55 pounds to rise in the air. Later that year these results were published in a US magazine.
Townsend Brown’s development of Electrogravitics tech began in the mid 1920’s. Townsend Brown discovered that electric charge and gravitational mass are coupled. He found that when a capacitor is charged to a high voltage, it has a tendency to move toward its positive pole. His findings, which became known as the BiefeldBrown effect, were opposed by conventional minded physicists of his time. Brown conducted a demonstration for military top brass. He flew a pair of 3-foot diameter discs around a 50-foot course tethered to a central pole. Energized with 150,000 volts and emitting ions from their leading edge, they attained speeds of several hundred miles per hour. The subject was thereafter classified. Project Winterhaven involved Brown submitting a proposal to the Pentagon for the development of a Mach 3 disc shaped electrogravitic fighter craft. Drawings of its basic design are shown in one of his patents. They are essentially large-scale versions of his tethered test discs.
The rest is as they say, history…
Additional references and pertinent info on the physics and technology involved with the above described electrogravitic craft:
- "The U.S. Antigravity Squadron" (Dr. Paul Laviollette wrote this article for inclusion in Tom Valone's breakthrough book "Electrogravitics Systems". The article below is a partial-length reprint of Laviolette's work suggesting a connection between the B2-Bomber and the 1960's electrogravitics research of TT-Brown) : https://archive.org/details/ventura-03
- An article exploring how Defense contractors raced to create ZPE tech (technology that extracts usable energy from the quantum vacuum (including BAE systems) then all the research went dark: https://archive.org/details/zero-point-energy
-Physics of the zero-point field: implications for inertia, gravitation and mass ( Harold E. Puthoff ) : https://archive.org/details/sst97
-An electromagnetic basis for inertia and gravitation: What are the implications for 21st century physics and technology? (B. Haisch, A. Rueda) Published 15 January 1998 Physics: https://archive.org/details/zpf_staif98
I appreciate you taking the time to read and share your thoughts.
I posted additional pertinent information pertaining to the mass cancellation (aka "anti-gravity") technology I had mentioned in two more new comments above.
Gavin, I apologise for keeping you waiting. I began writing a reply, but it kept getting longer and taking longer time to get to the end. (I'm afraid I'm a slow writer, and an even slower thinker) I hope to get back to you with it over the next few hours.
I have an intense schedule at my day job (regenerative landscape design and installation) this time of year so it is likely I will not be able to respond for a day or two anyways.
Thanks for taking the time to read and contemplate what I shared.
The point being: I advocate for less technology, not more. A low-tech, analogue future, in a vastly different vision than the techno-everything nightmare that we're being presented by the rapacious class and their government lackeys. I propose the slowing-down, and the stretching of distance, making the world bigger, rather than the contraction of time and space, and the diminishing and deterioration of everything that advancing technology leads to.
I also advocate for less technology (not more) given the current state of consciousness of humanity and our adolescent social and spiritual development as a species.
There are individuals like Dr. Steven Greer that feel they can safely get some of the breakthrough clean energy and propulsion technologies out from the highly classified military/contracting arena and into being used in a beneficial way by the general public (to end pollution and energy monopolies) but despite my knowing the technology is real, I have my reservations about the process and timeline he proposes in films like this: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=A3xI-DPLdWI
While I have managed to confirm that the vast majority of the intel presented by Steven Greer and his team is legit and represents actionable intel I do not necessarily share his views regarding glorifying high tech sterilized robotic hydroponic agriculture (which so called “free energy” would make widely available) as some kind of amazing solution and step forward in our evolution as a species.
I mean don’t get me wrong, I do think that the guy is right when he says that if the suppressed zero point energy field extraction tech (so called “free energy” generators) were to become widely available it would reduce the cost of most things to nearly zero, shift the macro-economic order, destabilize existing hyper-consolidated monopolistic oligarchies and help us to drastically reduce pollution, but thinking that some giant hydroponic artificial food growing systems are the answer to world hunger and improving our quality of life is all wrong.
Spending time working close with the plants in a natural setting, with living soil, a diverse range of plants, trees and fungi, that is the medicine that each and every human being that is physically able needs, not some quick fix startrek food replicator nonsense.
We were created (and/or evolved) to interact with living ecosystems symbiotically, it is part of what maintains our health as human beings. High tech quick fixes are not a path to spiritually or socially evolve as a species.. in order to truly liberate our human race we must first liberate the mind and the heart, which requires reconnecting with the living planet Earth. Greer talks about meditation and the living planet (which is great) but then he shows these CGI renderings of some future he depicts and describes as a glorious golden age for humanity and it shows these giant hydroponic growing operations with robots, I think while that kind of cultivation may be helpful in some situations, we should be focusing on real living soil, regenerating the soil and creating food forests (as the ancients did) before anything else. I do look forward to that film he is putting out this year though (The Lost Century) but I have my reservations about the high tech quick fix agriculture stuff he puts on a pedestal.
Blimey! Gavin, you write so well, and so fast! I humbly concede, without the slightest resent, to a far better writer and much deeper and more thorough thinker. This is an extremely worthwhile topic, make no mistake, and you have chosen your mission well indeed. Because it is clear that this is your mission, and I wish you every success. But we both know that it's an exceedingly difficult one.
Thanks again for the link to "Bright Green Lies." That's another one to add to my growing reading list. My own awareness of the fraudulent state of the environmental movement, the form that I have since learnt it has been remodeled into since the 60s and early 70s, began in earnest when I worked at an academic research institute almost twenty years ago. While I accumulated my own anecdotal evidence, principally from my observations of how so much about physical and planetary science academia had degenerated by way of the corrupting influence of politicised funding, I also came across the work of Bjørn Lomborg and his book "The Skeptical Environmentalist" (2001), which seemed even to my etiolated mind to have more soundly argued and better substantiated premises than the universal "climate change" motive repeated like a mantra by academics, as well as any government mouthpiece or environmental/climate change cultist.
I should have watched the video with Steven Greer before responding, but I thought I'd respond to your output first and foremost.
"High tech quick fixes are not a path to spiritually or socially evolve as a species.. in order to truly liberate our human race we must first liberate the mind and the heart, which requires reconnecting with the living planet Earth."
Without qualification, this is the prayer-ender. This is where it begins, and ends for me. There's almost nothing else, unless we're decided on rummaging through the details.
The pursuance of greater and cheaper energy is a fool's errand and a assured bearing toward downfall.
"... we should be focusing on real living soil, regenerating the soil and creating food forests (as the ancients did) before anything else."
The greatest, perhaps the only genuine sacrilege is the contemporary denial of fundamental, elemental and inviolable human cohesion and dependence on the soil, water, and air - being the very matter we and all life has emerged from. All that prattle about bio-digital convergence and the managed evolution of the human species by human ingenuity itself is such absurd nonsense from insufferably shameless and hubristic, and thoroughly obnoxious intellectual poseurs and imposters.
I'm repeating here what I've posted elsewhere, so I hope you'll forgive me for commending myself:
People blithely adopt and absorb technology, however potentially hazardous it might be, into their homes and merge it into their work and play practices, their lives and into their very bodies, without the least effort in considered examination as to what purpose might be for its existence, nor especially whether it is even necessary. I'm not advocating for conversion to Ludditism (though I certainly won't denounce the spirit I assume gave rise to it), but why have we not as individuals, or collectively as a society, made a determination to define clearly for ourselves, our families, our communities and society what might be considered appropriate technology, and what the appropriate level of mechanisation/instrumentation/electrification/etc. that is to be tolerated, but not one skerrick more? Instead what we have demonstrated is an unconscious, bovine laisser passer with technology. We've foolishly allowed the advertisers (actually, those whom the advertisers work for and who own the agencies) to decide for us, make these determinations, and to steer us into behaving exactly as the bastards want us to.
But as far as one of the overarching themes of the subject is concerned - that there might be paradigm-changing scientific conjectures, maybe even entirely unrevealed fields of inquiry, and revolutionary technologies that have been sequestered by the (deep-) state and concealed - this is very likely true. Firstly because the masters of governments, who are also the originators, executors, trustees and beneficiaries of the deep state, are irreverent mercantilists, of the most rapacious and blood-sucking variety imaginable, and they unwaveringly seek to maximise profits in whatever racket they already have going. If anything, their calculus has so far been yielding a result of greater profits from kicking the can down the road and continuing to squeeze the juice out of the already picked and over-ripe and shrivelling orange (fossil fuels, and indirectly uranium) than they might be able get out of any new fruit - for the time being.
Despite taking so long to provide this reply, if you were expecting a focused cross-examination and technical appraisal of the technology, then I'm afraid this will be a disappointing read.
Thanks very much for your detailed synopsis and for sharing the links to more comprehensive information. These are undeniably intriguing nascent, groundbreaking technologies that would have far-reaching implications, if the promise were ever realised. I've followed-up the links and downloaded the electronic books and documents, though it will take me some time to read through those sources, and because engineering and fundamental/gravitational physics/mechanics are subjects somewhat out of my wheelhouse (that is despite the fact that I was scientifically trained, and I have some academic and professional attainment, but those formal aspects have all but lapsed from years of non-participation - it's a long story), it will still take a considerable investment of time and effort for me to be able to properly evaluate the scientific and engineering principles and technologies proposed.
Bluntly, to my mind this speculative technology is in the category of the solution looking for a problem to solve. Beyond the "gee-whiz" factor, I just don't see how or why the world needs it, or could in any way benefit from it. On the other hand, long-term there are only down-sides that I can see. It does promises immense power, but while governments exist there's absolutely no chance whatsoever they'd freely allow any civilian to hold and utilise it.
Science and technology increases human power - and magnifies the flaws in human nature. It has enabled us to have higher living standards and live longer, but it has simultaneously brought about the decrease in life gratification and value, and the debasement of community and fellowship. It has enabled us to travel further and faster, but at the cost of devaluing the world and occasioning an insatiable avidity. And because it concentrates into the hands of the rapacious class, at the same time it allows them to wreak immense planetary destruction, and on their fellow humans, it enables them to create misery on an ever larger scale.
Thank you for the in depth, perspicacious, insightful and candid comments. I agree with much of what you have shared above and though I do not have time this morning to write a proper response and engaged with you on the viable solutions and vision for the future side of things, I will share a few comments I posted elsewhere that relate to this so you can see how I do share many of your concerns with humans coveting and depending on high tech devices (and I personally intend to lean less and less on high tech in my own life).
Many think electric cars and lithium / cobalt battery powered solar / wind powered houses are a "green" way to keep on living as we have been, but as I illuminated in my comments regarding lithium mining, that is a fallacy. Others are now involved with putting Hot Fusion technology on that same pedestal but in my opinion, it is also a technology that is ripe for abuse.
I would like to express my concerns about the current forms of nuclear fusion being promoted as "green" or "sustainable". The PR sounds great, but underneath the hype, when you take a look at what materials and equipment are required, this kind if hot fusion tech they are working on at ITER can only result in a new kind of energy corporation monopoly. This whole push for hot fusion reactors (and all the billions in tax payer money and other funding sources being spent on it) reminds me of the cancer industry and its endless push for more funding for “research” (scooped up through campaigns and going right into big pharma’s pocket perpetually so they can develop, patent and have a monopoly on brutally expensive chemo drugs etc (while real proven natural cures are blackboxed, ‘fact checked’ or otherwise demonized in some way or ignored because they cannot be patented).
The hot fusion reactors that are being promoted in the mainstream news/academic circles right now are extremely wasteful in how much energy is required to operate them (for the high-powered lasers). Also, even if they could create a chain reaction that was self-sustaining, it would still require extremely expensive specialized equipment and materials. For instance, one gram of deuterium is currently costing more than a gram of gold to produce and tritium is being estimated to cost $2 billion per kilogram produced (requiring lithium to be produced, which again means depending on a finite resource, that is strip mined etc). If these hot fusion reactors were adopted and developed to plug into our existing power grid it would result in existing centralized energy cartels creating monopolies (just like they did with oil) dominating people’s access to the energy the hot fusion devices would create. This is not a wise or responsible solution to our global energy conundrum.
People like Eugene Mallove on the other hand were doing extremely important work on L.E.N.R. (aka “cold fusion”) technologies and exposed the systemic corruption of institutions like MIT (and their actively covering up discoveries pertaining to said scientific developments). See: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6y98YwJ2GEE for more info. The technology he was working on (related to LENRs) would be able to be applied in a decentralized fashion and scaled to the needs of situations globally. That however would threaten the pocket books of some very powerful people, thus Eugene Mallove was killed and here we are with hot fusion being promoted in universities and on the news (as, unlike "cold fusion" tech, hot fusion tech is something that can be monopolized).
The real challenge we face with solving the so called "energy crisis" on Earth is not something that requires billions to be solved, it is more a matter of either taking steps to stop depending on technology that is destroying Mother Earth in each of our lives and/or figuring out a way to get the already extant inventions (which are cheaper, applicable in a decentralized way and scalable to any situation) from our brightest minds past the buzz saw of institutionalized suppression, thievery, and murderous operations that have stunted human ingenuity in this field of study and engineering for many decades now. https://fas.org/blogs/secrecy/2010/10/invention_secrecy_2010/ Since I have no confidence in our ability to get around the murderous mechanisms of truly clean, efficient, scalable and decentralized energy technologies, I am opting for withdrawing my support from the technological infrastructure and refraining from buying any future gadgets now that I know what I know about lithium, cobalt, tantalum and tungsten.
Many have unconsciously decided that the most they are willing to do is choose what they consider to be the 'least' destructive and toxic industries which will allow them to continue to live a life of comfort and high tech toys.
I often invite them to consider the third option of not supporting either industry. I am certainly not there yet as I am typing this message on a desktop computer tied into an industrial electrical grid but I intend on heading in that direction. I could list a few dozen other technologies that could replace, oil, lithium batteries, nuclear, solar, wind and hydroelectric energy corporations. Have you ever heard of Dimitri Petronov? He had developed a plasma battery the size of a shoebox that powered his entire two bedroom house and all the appliances in it for over a year without a single recharge, but after some visits from "investors" and then military/intelligence types, he disappeared and his body was later found in the Volga river. Sadly, his story is not unique, Dr. Eugene Mallove (MIT, mentioned above and shown in the video linked above) and Dr. Aries M. DeGeus were also doing some promising work on plasma energy generation and storage tech, and both of them also ended up dead. http://www.rexresearch.com/articles2/thorium.htm Then there are other technologies that are even cleaner such as Stanley Meyer's water fuel cell, or the countless toroidal geometry based energy extraction devices that tap into the quantum vacuum and produce usable electricity without requiring any fuel or mining. Considering the massive global industries and oligarchs that are opposed to energy generation/storage tech coming out that would threaten their monopolies (and considering all the people they have murdered and bribed to keep it that way over the decades), I do not think it is realistic for us to hope for any large scale energy device manufacturing revolution to be able to supply us with the energy we need to keep living with all our gadgets and high tech addictions (while still claiming to value protecting nature and respecting Mother Earth).
I often point out to people the fact that that humans have existed for millennia without electricity and a great many of them lived fulfilling lives of purpose, creativity, grace, courage and spiritual growth. The inherent built in perspective that sees cities and industrial electrical grids as being something we must perpetuate (via either conventional means or more "sustainable" alternatives) misses the point that there is a third option. The third option is refusing to participate in funding the destruction of Mother Earth's body and innocent children (such as those that work in the Cobalt mines in the Congo to get the rare metals required to make these smart devices we are reading and writing on now) and being willing to make the sacrifice of letting go of our high tech addictions and creature comforts to live a more simple life in close symbiotic connection with the living Earth where we live (as our ancestors did). Many will not be willing to do that, and will make excuses why we must continue to buy high tech gadgets, build out cities and power the industrial power grid as the real ethical alternative is something they are not willing to consider. In the end it all boils down to if we believe that our comfort and enjoyment is worth more than the lives of children in the Cobalt mines and the integrity of the ecosystems all over the world that are being strip mined and poisoned so we can continue to live comfortably in the "developed" world.
Thus, as I said above for me , it all boils down to the fact that those that wish to walk a path guided by any kind of honest moral compass (including but not limited to the permaculture ethical imperative of People Care-Earth Care-Future Care) are going to have to make some hard choices if we want our actions to continue to align with the principles we espouse and claim to live by.
Linda Yaccarino was also a director and chairman of the US Advertising Council, a long-time tool of the liberal-fascist Council on Foreign Relations network. Here's some background from the early 1960s. Same script, different season:
"The Advertising Council serves as a public relations operation to promote selected projects supported by the Council on Foreign Relations (CFR) and its interlocking affiliates. It was created in 1942 as a tax-exempt, non-governmental agency to promote wartime programs of government: rationing, salvage, the selling of war bonds, and so on.
The Advertising Council continued after the war to perform this same service: selecting, for free promotion, projects that are "importantly in the public interest." Thus, officials of the Advertising Council (many of whom are CFR members) have become czars in a most important field. They arbitrarily decide what is, and what is not, in the public interest...creating and saturating the media with the skillful propaganda that "sells" the project to the public...
The Advertising Council has promoted the "mental health" project, which, superficially, appears to be an admirable effort...but whose underlying and dubious purpose is to promote the passage, in all states, of "mental health" laws fabricated by international socialists in the World Health Organization and in the U.S. Public Health Service.
These laws, to "facilitate access to hospital care" for mentally ill people, provide no new facilities, prescribe no better treatment, nor do anything else to relieve the suffering of sick people. The new "mental health" laws...eliminate the constitutional safeguards of a person accused of being mentally ill, thus making it easier for bureaucrats, political enemies and selfish relatives to commit him and get him out of the way."
From the Ad Council history timeline: "Our current projects reflect the Ad Council’s ongoing commitment to core issues including mental health, health equity, racial justice and diversity, equity and inclusion, and alongside our incredible partners, we won’t stop..." adcouncil.org/our-story/our-history
Don't forget the 50 million Ad Fund campaign they did all over the TV and radio called "It's Up to You" trying to push everyone to get vaccinated. They called it building vaccine confidence for those on the fence. I barely ever watch TV or radio and still seemed to see a bunch of them blasted all over public spaces. Sick
How ironic and Freudian that the psychopaths in the WHO would want to promote a "mental health" project for mentally ill people whose only purpose is to eliminate them and their constitutional rights and are the basis of their "red flag" laws.
We should all know by now that any thing these unconstitutional NGOs and agencies do is a trojan horse for some other nefarious purpose, and not what they disguise it as.
Also, in order to build the malfunctioning (and/or weaponized cars) he is funding the destruction of some of the last pristine ecosystems on Earth. Musk's money and other billionaires that are hungry for lithium and cobalt are now targeting my backyard in Ontario.
I have compiled the following intel for anyone that lives in northern Ontario, Quebec, near any of the Great Lakes and also for anyone that cares about the Boreal Forest.
The Boreal Forest is being assaulted even now in northern Ontario and Quebec but what they plan on doing starting this year and going forward is truly horrifying.
Over 217,000 Hectares of forest, lakes and rivers have been purchased by lithium mining corporations that intend to strip mine in northern Ontario and Quebec (I provide a breakdown of which companies have purchased what land below).
Hard rock lithium mining involves deforestation, draining lakes and rivers, blowing the land into pieces with explosives, carving deep gashes into the Earth with giant machines, using truckloads of industrial solvents like sulfuric acid (resulting in water contamination with toxic sludge) dragging that processed rubble to processing facilities with fleets of heavy machinery then processing the ore with extremely high energy furnaces using another slew of toxic chemicals (which further contaminate the water table, lakes, rivers and ocean elsewhere).
To extract one ton of lithium, you need to contaminate approximately 500,000 gallons of water. Lithium mining also destroys the soil structure and leads to unsustainable water table reduction. In the end, it depletes water resources, leaving the land too dry and exposing ecosystems to the risk of extinction.
The long term results are water loss, ground destabilization, biodiversity loss, increased salinity of rivers, contaminated soil, massive PM 2.5 emissions and toxic waste. Some of the most common lithium mining wastes are sulfuric acid discharge and the radioactive uranium byproduct (which leaches into the ground water, streams, rivers and lakes). They can cause various forms of cancer and diseases. The mining also presents other serious problems like large amounts of lime and magnesium wastes.
As Lithium extraction causes surface water contamination, it also destroys other water sources. So, it’s also responsible for the creation of toxic rain. The water cycle largely depends on the limited forests. The trees extract underground water and release it into the atmosphere for this process to continue. Therefore, lithium mining hinders the water cycle from providing adequate rainfall in the affected areas. The impacts are severe. The long term result will be increased regional droughts, soil erosion and the risk of desertification.
Lithium miners cut down trees and remove all other life forms from their targeted mining areas to eliminate obstructions.
Strip mining and deforestation is not something that can be undone. It means the decimation of ancient diverse ecosystems, the poisoning of the sacred waters and extinction of species and so there is nothing “sustainable”, “renewable” or “green” about it.
1- Ultra Lithium – intends to destroy 2,416+ hectares of land around Forgan Lake and Georgia Lake (near Thunder Bay, Ontario).
2- International lithium corporation – intends to destroy 47,700 hectares (477 square kilometers) of boreal forest around Raleigh Lake (located near Ignace, Ontario)
3- Fairservice Lithium – intends to destroy 2,544 hectares of boreal forest around Mavis Lake, Ontario
4- Peggy Group – intends to destroy 7,386 hectares of boreal forest located about 80km north of Sioux Lookout, in the province of Ontario.
5- Rock Edge – intends to destroy 6378 hectares of boreal forest (in their combined “Maun” and “Terrier” properties) between the East Wabigoon and English River, in Ontario.
6- The Hearst Project – intends to destroy 29,805 hectares of land located roughly 15 kilometers south of Hearst, Ontario.
7- Frontier Lithium’s PAK Project (involving Green Technology Metals corporation)- intends to destroy 67,800 hectares of boreal forest near Red Lake (with two subsidiary projects called “Seymour” and “Root”).
8- Vancouver’s “Lithium One Metals” and Critical Elements Corporation – intend to destroy 53,000+ hectares (530 km2) of boreal forest in Northern Ontario and the James Bay side of Quebec.
—————————————–
This is not a comprehensive list, there are many more mines planned for the areas listed above (and all over Canada in the Boreal Forest zone). I just got emotionally exhausted after spending half a day reading the lithium mining company’s press releases where they were bragging about having rights to begin blasting the land to pieces soon for profit (and bragging about having paid off the locals and having made them sign binding contracts so they cannot complain about environmental/health damages in future years) so I had to stop researching for the day.
The boreal forest is teeming with life (containing about two thirds of Canada’s 140 000 species of plants, animals, and micro-organisms.) To describe it, let’s begin with the trees that make up the forest canopy. There are about 20 species of them (including but not limited to Spruce, fir, pine, and tamarack, trembling aspen, balsam poplar, birch and more). The boreal plays a critical role in how the planet breathes through the process of photosynthesis. By extension, it also shapes the composition of the atmosphere, which today includes maintaining 21 percent of the life supporting concentrations of oxygen in our atmosphere.
The boreal forest shelters more than 85 species of mammals, including some of the largest and most majestic—wood bison, elk, moose, woodland caribou, grizzly and black bears, and wolves—and smaller species, such as beavers, snowshoe hares, Canada lynx, red squirrels, lemmings, and voles.
Nearly half of the birds in North America rely on the boreal forest at some time during the year. It is estimated that at least 3 billion landbirds, water birds, and shorebirds breed in the boreal forest each year, representing more than 300 species. Another 300 million birds, including several species of shorebirds, swans, and geese, breed farther north and travel through the boreal forest during migration. It is estimated that 32 000 insect species inhabit Canada’s boreal forest, although about one third of these species have yet to be described. Canada’s boreal forest is home to about 130 species of fish (including minnows, stickleback and Larger species such as including walleye, northern pike, lake trout, Arctic grayling, yellow perch, brook trout, whitefish and burbot).
In order to illustrate the potential for catastrophic harm to ecosystems and human health that these mines pose I present a cautionary tale: The Liqi River was once full of fish: Almost none are left. Chemical spills from the Ganzizhou Rongda lithium mine have killed many. “The whole river stank, and it was full of dead yaks and dead fish,” said one villager.: “Masses” of dead fish covered the river. The people got the mine shut down three times, only to have the government reopen it. ( for more info : https://tibetnature.net/en/lichu-river-poisoned-case-minyak-lhagang-lithium-mine-protest/?fbclid=IwAR2ulyVpJ3DR3tYOwX6wW4MkZy1elR6bjNpS03B4f4jF32LcAjdNvekjU0c )
One of the elders said, “Old people, we see the mines and we cry. What are the future generations going to do? How are they going to survive? ”. A local activist surveyed people in the area. Even if mining companies split the profits and promised to repair the land after the mines are exhausted, the Tibetans wanted no part of it. “God is in the mountains and the rivers, these are the places that spirits live,” he explained.” “sustainable development” technology (Lithium battery tech) offers everything: every luxury, every whim, available at the touch of a ‘carbon-free’ button. But the world that these technologies provide will be a rotting, desecrated, and, finally, dead world if we let them continue on their crusade to turn the living world into dead things, for profit and to perpetuate our obscene technologically addicted western “civilized society”.
In the concentrations extracted via industrial mining operations, lithium is harmful to living beings. It interferes with sperm viability, causes birth defects, memory problems, kidney failure, movement disorders, and so on. Other materials in an electric-car battery can be even more harmful than lithium, with nickel and cobalt electrodes being the most destructive component.
As I covered in a past comment, about half of the cobalt used in lithium batteries comes from the Democratic Republic of the Congo, where 40,000 children as young as four are essentially enslaved in mines, carrying backbreaking loads in conditions of intense heat, with no safety equipment, under abusive managers and guards, for a wage of a dollar a day.
Here in Canada, we may end up paying our cobalt miners more money and they may be wearing steel toes and hard hats, but the impacts on the ecosystem, the lakes, rivers and future generations will be just as devastating.
There’s no circumventing the fact that these energy-storage technologies are fundamentally destructive. And they’re dependent on a global supply chain and advanced manufacturing technologies that, themselves, are fundamentally destructive. Machines making machines making machines; and while more and more hyperbolic “green” headlines are written, the planet is being murdered so we can have fun playing on i-pads and e-scooters.
Next on the hit list for corporate pillaging in the name of “sustainable development” is the Boreal Forest of Canada.
As described above, our corrupt corporation captured government is helping to initiate large projects to pillage the lands of indigenous peoples (Cree of Eeyou Istchee, the Shakopaatikoong peoples of the Slate Falls first nation and the Waabitigweyaang peoples of Sandy Lake, among others ) and the body of Mother Earth in new Lithium (cobalt and tantalum) mines in northern Ontario and Quebec.
I have been reaching out to the Indigenous leaders in northern Ontario but so far the only two that got back to me told me that the mining companies had sent in teams of people to their town hall meetings and convinced most of the people in their community how beneficial the mines were going to be for them financially, sadly, this seems to have convinced many of them to lay down, take the money and not fight this. I am not gonna give up though..
Given the nature of open pit mining, lithium leeching ponds and lithium refining, the inevitable result will be large scale poisoning of the water table and the ocean in James bay, contamination of the great lakes (through lake Superior, moving downstream into all the other great lakes), deforestation and genocide of local wildlife.
These corporations intend to clear cut the boreal forest, annihilating the little bit of remaining habitat that exists in Ontario for the moose, caribou, the lynx, bears, the mountain lion, wolves, fox, bobcats, eagles, hawks and countless other winged and four legged beings.
The fish in the lakes, the whales and countless other beings in James bay, they will all be decimated by these projects.
These corporations appear to be moving in fast and as quiet as possible (paying off locals with bribes along the way and getting them to sign binding agreements) to avoid local and environmentalist resistance.
These projects will mean we trade blood for lithium so we can have fun i-pads and electric cars to play with. We will be trading the ancient beauty and majesty of the Boreal forest and all it’s inhabitants for smart phones and tesla cars. I can’t help but ask myself this question… Is it really worth it?
Those that wish to walk a path guided by any kind of honest moral compass (including but not limited to the permaculture ethical imperative of People Care-Earth Care-Future Care) are going to have to make some hard choices in the coming years if we want our actions to continue to align with the principles we espouse and claim to live by.
You are a colossus, may your courage and strength be boundless. Yours is the noblest of fights, I hope you achieve a quick victory, but my greater hope is that you attain absolute victory.
Thank you for the kind words and well wishes. I stand on the shoulders of giants so I cannot take all the credit and see many others engaging in other noble (and equally important) endeavors (which are different than the endeavors I am engaged with) but I will strive to do my best to live up to your generous description of my efforts.
Thanks for reading and for the thoughtful comment.
I do have my own substack newsletter and blog (and I am also about to publish a book).
I covered all the material in the comments above and also included a broader historical exploration of the driving psychological mechanisms and worldviews/belief systems that led us to where we are (many being willing to trade blood for lithium so we can continue to live comfortably while lying to themselves and calling it "green" and "sustainable") in this article:
thank you that's great to hear- I look forward to checking out your stack and look forward to your book ! tx for leaning into this topic - again very important to reframe and properly ground the entire conversation
Yes, you did, and yes, you were right. I do know Elon Musk was an intelligence asset and frontman...but was kinda hoping he had a change of allegiance.
You certainly do try hard searching for the bones in this flim-flam. There aren't any and never were, to be sure, but I don't think that will deter your optimism.
Here is a simple metric with which to gauge whether your candidate sociopolitical deliverer, redeemer, emancipator and champion is the real deal, or just another charlatan: did COVID-19 result in a consolidation or boost in their profits/wealth/influence/power? If it did, you're pinning your hopes on another quisling.
"I think we are totally fucked unless Trump somehow gets into office in 2024 and deports all illegals and builds a 50’ concrete wall."
Good grief, Trump is an operator in precisely the same fraudulent, murderous government/bureaucratic/political apparatus as all his predecessors and faux-opponents. There is no "unless" while we permit this system to remain. Trump has no ambition to change a system that promotes and elevates and stokes his vainglory, and he has no genuine plan to materially change anything to the general benefit of all. Just as with any limited hangout, he throws some saccharine candy to the public, and while the people are bamboozled, the hornswoggle keeps advancing.
You are correct in your assessment of how totally fegged we are though, but there are simply no meaningful repairs possible in the present/past/ever government/bureaucratic/political system - the reforms are all only ever just window-dressing - regardless of who ascends to the presidency.
Tucker Carlson is a Judas mare whose goal and purpose is to usher the blind sheeple info Musk’s X world. Tucker was a Fox psyop…his repetitious, inappropriate and utterly fake cackle (worse than Kamala) was a psychological trick aimed at the desensitization of serious topics/issues. Tucker pretended (?) to eat bugs with a WEF/UN “chef” shortly before leaving Fox and claiming they were “delicious!” Tucker is a fraud…a globalist…and his partnership with Musk proves it. Hopefully his devotees will wake up and not follow him to Twitter/X world where they will be “assimilated.”
Tucker is a globalist…he has finally revealed his hand. We have to relinquish attachments to anyone in conventional media and in the conventional world at large. There is no facet that is not corrupt. Thinking for yourself, walking with Jesus, and relying on God’s truth…seeing the world through a Biblical worldview…is the only way to navigate the evil permeating the world in which we live.
Yes, of course. That is why i termed Twitter as a limited hangout social media platform like most of the others.
Do you really think the CIA & Deep State would "sell" their Twitter to a real free speech player? Do you think they need money? Of course not. The whole thing was kabuki theater when Musk pretended to renege on deal, and then they finally settled.
Those who control the money printing machine will never run out of money. This is about control. Free speech was already dead but it's a little more dead today.
So we stop accepting their money. It was always theirs any way, and in accepting it, we've made it the measure of everything - even our very blood - and allowed ourselves to be enslaved.
We walk-out on them, their money, their governments, en masse, and we start using alternatives, and when/where a suitable or sufficient one can't be found, we invent one. And then another. We starve the beast as we re-make the world.
Let's face it, they own the game, they own the rules, they own the outcome. Let them keep it, for what it's worth, and we'll instead make our own.
Everything Elon has said to date about tyranny and free speech is washed away into oblivion with his newly appointed CEO WEF puppet. There is NO QUESTION now that he is part of that system and a bald faced liar.
Solid post, it's been clear to anyone paying attention that both Musk *and* Tucker are controlled opposition and one shouldn't put one's faith in either of them. I did a deep dive on them yesterday collaborating many of the points you've made: https://neofeudalreview.substack.com/p/how-trustworthy-are-elon-musk-and
As with “his” Tesla electric cars, which ultimate goal is not to mandate such cars as future ownership but rather complete elimination of private cars usage, other creations of “his” serve only the continuous progress of "one fits all" products and services of the planned technocracy nightmare. One Health, One Truth, One Internet of Everything, One Gender, One Religion. ONE PRISON!
And all that with population’s consent and acceptance.
What else has to happen for people to see the obvious?
While your constant reminder "don't comply" applied by most would solve all these problems peacefully and without bloodshed in no time.
Will we ever grow up to preserve ourselves? One sure thing is that no external salvation force is coming to do it for us.
Unless you believe in man-made religion which was created to give mankind a false sense of security in daily life and salvation from Hell. The way things are going now and will most likely end up being in the years to come, we're already in Hell.
100% Life's a stockyard. Most of us just aren't aware who are the goats & who are the cattle. Musky has bombed Kanada for months with ads promising his newest ponzi scheme (just because he loves 🇨🇦) will result in Canadians not having to work. I've never looked into it- that's all I needed to hear. Now he hires Wefs media PR shill for future of work to run the prop for $8 worth of "free speech"? I can't wait for the next episode.
Why do we elevate these elites to such stratospheric levels and worship them as gods? By definition they are not smart. If they were smart, they would align with God and not with Satan. If Elon Musk believes that the EpiPen is the cure for auto-immune reactions to a foreign synthetic spike protein that the bodies of the injected have been programmed to manufacture ad-infinitum, he is a moron.
Also, it's looking like Mrna was a false. Potentially covy was anthrax based. George Webb is working on this. (his podcasts the last week). No idea what is in the injections, but several batches tested did not have MRNA. Several peeps i have talked too, also did not receive COLD injection, which was supposed to protect the Mrna from degradation. Enjoy the nano-goo!
They have no doubt made the deployment very complex. People are dying and are having severe auto immune reactions to some kind of foreign synthetic particle, no doubt the induced spike protein. Suffice to say their intent is wicked, and they hope to cover the genocide as long as possible. Like Jonestown and Waco, in the collapse of the cult, and this is the biggest and oldest cult, they will kill and burn down all they can. There is no exaggeration in the phrase, "This is biblical"!
While it is an extremely complicated and intricate story, it is in fact graspable and, in being the work of the human mind - though criminally-insane minds, to be sure - with concentrated effort we may indeed be able to understand it. But please do not make the error of over-simplifying or dismissing the troves of information available, and the truly heroic work done of those who have dredged the information from the murky abyss.
Sasha Latypova in particular, though there will be others, has exposed the manufacturing procedures and, more importantly, how they run resolutely counter to responsible, ethical manufacturing principles. Study Sasha's work and you will better understand the injections and why there might not be any, or very little, "MRNA" in them (how you should refer to this is an sLNP-encased mRNA encoding a modified hybrid viral capsule-derived spike protein - a mouthful, to be sure, but details are important).
I urge you to seek clarification in Sasha's work, but if I may repeat of my understandings that I've written elsewhere, Pfizer's COVID-19 injection manufacturing process is intentionally imprecise and the volumes of the material produced each time is so large that it is nigh on impossible to maintain precise control of the composition of the product the results. Accordingly, the incidence of largely "blank" shots and the clean bills of health in about 80% of those who have been injected by these mRNA gene transfection shots is likely to have been a result of the injection they received containing predominantly, if not entirely, the aqueous layer of the sLNP suspension. The other 20% of people injected with these shots were not so lucky. If this is a correct reading of the investigation's findings (again, you should verify) then intentionally injecting people with saline as a placebo was not necessary - an effective placebo was baked into the cake with the separation of the sLNP-encased spike protein mRNA suspension's components.
I have followed Sasha. Thanks for your thorough reply.
And I tend to agree with the pfizer lot, being how you describe; LNP + stuff. Also take note, that there were about 12 Subcontractors that made ingredients for the shots.
Emergent BioSolutions is one such company (referenced in RFK's book, with it's own appalling safety/purity record). Founder El-Hibri, is buddies with Kadlec. Their flagship product circa ~2000, BioThrax®, an anthrax 'vaccine'. Likely there is Multiple junk floating around in the Slow Kill BioWeapons. And as you say, the various levels of synthetic caca, will distribute wherever causing damage. Thank you again. (edit: 1 typo)
Please accept my apologies, you are clearly better informed - actually, your knowledge and awareness seems of a higher order, indeed! - than the impression I received and what I understood your post above to convey.
Apologies again, and thank you for sharing these intricate details. They are invaluable in the resolving of the entire diabolical jig-saw puzzle, and I hope you'll continue your researches to the end.
This might be an ad hominem of sorts but for me anyone who genuinely thought covid-shots, masks or lockdowns, mandates etc.. were good ideas, or who went along with them willingly and hasn't yet regretted those decisions (or realized that they were duped) basically has no standing when it comes to their ethical, social or political opinions.
That doesn't mean I agree with everyone who opposed the measures (or their reasons why) but at least they're not the authoritarians.
Man...I’ve really liked reading your thoughts over the last year but always kept some skepticism on your Musk take...but holy cow you nailed it.
With little humility I can say that my predictive track record is superlative.
As much as I don’t like stroking other people’s ego I must say I had to like your comment.
No one without ego works this hard.
It's simply part of the package.
spot-less and spot-on, my brother
🤣😂🤣😂🤣🤗
Did you ever hear about how Musk admitted to playing a part in a Coup d’etat in Bolivia over Lithium?
“Elon Musk Confesses to Lithium Coup in Bolivia”
https://www.telesurenglish.net/news/elon-musk-confesses-to-lithium-coup-in-bolivia-20200725-0010.html
“The CEO of the U.S.-based Telsa car manufacturer has admitted to involvement in what President Morales has referred to as a “Lithium Coup”.
“We will coup whoever we want! Deal with it.” was Elon Musk’s response to an accusation on twitter that the U.S. government organized a coup against President Evo Morales, so that Musk could obtain Bolivia’s lithium.”
“After Bolivia, Elon Musk says capitalists can overthrow any government they want”
https://www.peoplesworld.org/article/after-bolivia-elon-musk-says-capitalists-can-overthrow-any-government-they-want/
“Elon Musk and the Overthrow of Democracy in Bolivia”
https://socialistproject.ca/2020/07/elon-musk-overthrow-of-democracy-in-bolivia/
That's appalling, absolutely shocking! What disgusting depravity, villainy, degeneracy!
Good stuff, thanks.
Agreed.
Space X is a joke that uses a smoothed out version of antiquated tech with it’s roots in the 20-s.
Elon’s rocket-based craft that he uses to get into orbit are essentially just a more streamlined version of Wernher von Braun’s invention from 100 years ago. For those that do not know, Von Braun was the father of German rocket science. He invented the V-2 rockets, the missiles the Nazis launched toward England in the final months of World War II. He was also one of the Nazi’s brought over in operation paperclip.
So if Elon is so smart why is he using such archaic tech to get into space? Surely you do not think that controlled petroleum explosions are the best idea our brightest minds could come up with for propulsion systems in the last 100 years? Of course not, as early as around the same time Wernher von Braun was inventing his rocket systems for the nazis, others (like Dr. Kowsky and T. Townsend Brown) were dabbling in mass cancellation technology (Electrogravitics or what pop culture often describes as “anti-gravity”) for propulsion.
These types of propulsion systems (sometimes using harmonic resonance, acoustic levitation, high voltage systems and/or rotating ferro-fluids) were studied extensively in the open up until the early 50-s. Serious funding and studies were done. The subject of Electrogravitics can be found in prominent military R&D journals up until about 1954, at which point the whole subject goes dark and disappears off the radar. This was not due to failure, this was due to success, overwhelming and ground breaking success (using a variety of methods). I will provide documentation and additional evidence in subsequent comments for anyone that is curious to learn more.
Are rockets really the best he can do? Or it is just that the really efficient and groundbreaking tech is only used in classified military applications?
The real leading edge energy and propulsion tech that corporations like Raytheon or BAE (or Battelle, S.A.I.C., Booz-Allen and Hamilton, Inc, EG&G, Rockwell International etc) are working on would put both the oil and lithium cartels out of business and totally dismantle the energy cartel's monopoly, thus, front men and frauds like Musk are let loose to dance on the stage and convince those that do not know better that he is a cool, smart "green" billionaire bringing "innovation" and "freedom of speech" to the masses. People are easily duped.
Electromagnetic Lifter Technology (Electrogravitics) is technology that was developed by a brilliant mathematician and physicist who has elucidated the fundamental relationship between electromagnetism, magnetic fields and mass and gravity. Essentially, this technology (having been developed to the level of a proof of principle system as early as 8 decades ago) allows for a reduction in mass, allowing for lift. The principles allow for creating extremely efficient energy generation systems as well as advanced aerospace applications. Examples and scientific background of this technology have been described by Valone (1994, 2004), Cameron (2001), LaViolette (2008), and Loder (2002).
– Valone, T. (2004). Electrogravitics II: Validating reports on a new propulsion methodology. Beltsville,
MD, Integrity Research Institute. 159pp. https://ia601404.us.archive.org/35/items/ijg-2015042015204020/IJG_2015042015204020.pdf
– Cameron, J. (2001). “An Asymmetric Gravitational Wave Propulsion System,” AIAA Paper No. 2001-
3913, Joint Propulsion Conference, Salt Lake City, Utah, July 8-11, 2001. : https://arc.aiaa.org/doi/abs/10.2514/6.2001-3913
– LaViolette, P. (2008). Secrets of Antigravity Propulsion: Tesla, UFOs, and Classified Aerospace
Technology. Bear & Company. 512 pp. : https://archive.org/details/secrets-of-antigravity-propulsion_202211
-- Thomas E. Bearden “Energy from the Vacuum: Concepts & Principles” (PDF download, the book is 952 pages long, though pages 609 onwards are index, footnotes, and glossary. The book has the heaviness and thickness of a phone book.) : https://archive.org/details/energy-vacuum-bearden and for select pages from the book that are viewable directly on archive.org : https://archive.org/details/t.-e.-bearden-energy-from-the-vacuum-concepts-and-principles-additional
– Loder, T.C. III (2002). “Outside-the-box” space and terrestrial transportation and energy technologies for the 21st century. Presented at the 40th AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting, Reno, NV Jan. 2002. https://ia601504.us.archive.org/5/items/outside-the-box-ted-loder-paper-1/OutsideTheBox-TedLoderPaper%20%281%29.pdf
In the highly classified aerospace industry, such flying devices were dubbed ‘Flux Liners’ because they used the Quantum Vacuum Flux field to provide energy and propulsion. The early Aerospace prototypes used only a 24-volt marine battery as a power-up system, after which the device went ‘over unity’, drawing its power from the Quantum Vacuum of space. Later (once the military got their hands on downed exotic space craft) they used back engineering in combination with what they had learned from the human inventors above to create more efficient and powerful prototypes. One such iteration was called the “A.R.V.”. My research and sources indicate that effective gravity control technology was mastered in covert military R&D programs as of October of 1954. Significant improvements, augmentations and refinement has occurred since then, resulting in a wide array of craft being manufactured in compartmented military contracts (USAPs).
Historical Background:
It began with Townsend Brown and Kowsky-Frost.
In 1927 an article was published in German journal, describing research experiments by Prof. Kowsky and his engineer Mr. Frost. They discovered that if they placed a quartz crystal inside a metal box and treated it with high-powered radio waves the crystal expanded and caused the whole apparatus weighing 55 pounds to rise in the air. Later that year these results were published in a US magazine.
Townsend Brown’s development of Electrogravitics tech began in the mid 1920’s. Townsend Brown discovered that electric charge and gravitational mass are coupled. He found that when a capacitor is charged to a high voltage, it has a tendency to move toward its positive pole. His findings, which became known as the BiefeldBrown effect, were opposed by conventional minded physicists of his time. Brown conducted a demonstration for military top brass. He flew a pair of 3-foot diameter discs around a 50-foot course tethered to a central pole. Energized with 150,000 volts and emitting ions from their leading edge, they attained speeds of several hundred miles per hour. The subject was thereafter classified. Project Winterhaven involved Brown submitting a proposal to the Pentagon for the development of a Mach 3 disc shaped electrogravitic fighter craft. Drawings of its basic design are shown in one of his patents. They are essentially large-scale versions of his tethered test discs.
The rest is as they say, history…
Additional references and pertinent info on the physics and technology involved with the above described electrogravitic craft:
- "The U.S. Antigravity Squadron" (Dr. Paul Laviollette wrote this article for inclusion in Tom Valone's breakthrough book "Electrogravitics Systems". The article below is a partial-length reprint of Laviolette's work suggesting a connection between the B2-Bomber and the 1960's electrogravitics research of TT-Brown) : https://archive.org/details/ventura-03
- “Everything for nothing” - new physics based on the fluctuations of empty space (by Harold E. Puthoff) https://www.newscientist.com/article/mg12717275-500/
- An article exploring how Defense contractors raced to create ZPE tech (technology that extracts usable energy from the quantum vacuum (including BAE systems) then all the research went dark: https://archive.org/details/zero-point-energy
-Gravity as a zero-point-fluctuation force (Harold E. Puthoff): https://archive.org/details/gravity.-pra.paper-1
-Source of vacuum electromagnetic zero-point energy ( Harold E. Puthoff ): https://archive.org/details/source-of-vacuum-electromagnetic-zero-po
-Physics of the zero-point field: implications for inertia, gravitation and mass ( Harold E. Puthoff ) : https://archive.org/details/sst97
-An electromagnetic basis for inertia and gravitation: What are the implications for 21st century physics and technology? (B. Haisch, A. Rueda) Published 15 January 1998 Physics: https://archive.org/details/zpf_staif98
-Space Drives ( Electromagnetic ) ~ US Patents for anti-G, force-field propulsion, electro-kinetics, &c. : https://web.archive.org/web/20180703042632/http://rexresearch.com/antigrav/antigrav.htm
– https://www.integrityresearchinstitute.org/Pinheiro.pdf
– https://web.archive.org/web/20180703041949/http://rexresearch.com/perl/elgsys.htm
– https://web.archive.org/web/20190104012250/http://www.rexresearch.com/brown5/ttbrown5.htm
Very well put indeed!
I appreciate you taking the time to read and share your thoughts.
I posted additional pertinent information pertaining to the mass cancellation (aka "anti-gravity") technology I had mentioned in two more new comments above.
Gavin, I apologise for keeping you waiting. I began writing a reply, but it kept getting longer and taking longer time to get to the end. (I'm afraid I'm a slow writer, and an even slower thinker) I hope to get back to you with it over the next few hours.
No worries and no need to feel rushed.
I have an intense schedule at my day job (regenerative landscape design and installation) this time of year so it is likely I will not be able to respond for a day or two anyways.
Thanks for taking the time to read and contemplate what I shared.
The point being: I advocate for less technology, not more. A low-tech, analogue future, in a vastly different vision than the techno-everything nightmare that we're being presented by the rapacious class and their government lackeys. I propose the slowing-down, and the stretching of distance, making the world bigger, rather than the contraction of time and space, and the diminishing and deterioration of everything that advancing technology leads to.
I also advocate for less technology (not more) given the current state of consciousness of humanity and our adolescent social and spiritual development as a species.
There are individuals like Dr. Steven Greer that feel they can safely get some of the breakthrough clean energy and propulsion technologies out from the highly classified military/contracting arena and into being used in a beneficial way by the general public (to end pollution and energy monopolies) but despite my knowing the technology is real, I have my reservations about the process and timeline he proposes in films like this: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=A3xI-DPLdWI
While I have managed to confirm that the vast majority of the intel presented by Steven Greer and his team is legit and represents actionable intel I do not necessarily share his views regarding glorifying high tech sterilized robotic hydroponic agriculture (which so called “free energy” would make widely available) as some kind of amazing solution and step forward in our evolution as a species.
I mean don’t get me wrong, I do think that the guy is right when he says that if the suppressed zero point energy field extraction tech (so called “free energy” generators) were to become widely available it would reduce the cost of most things to nearly zero, shift the macro-economic order, destabilize existing hyper-consolidated monopolistic oligarchies and help us to drastically reduce pollution, but thinking that some giant hydroponic artificial food growing systems are the answer to world hunger and improving our quality of life is all wrong.
Spending time working close with the plants in a natural setting, with living soil, a diverse range of plants, trees and fungi, that is the medicine that each and every human being that is physically able needs, not some quick fix startrek food replicator nonsense.
We were created (and/or evolved) to interact with living ecosystems symbiotically, it is part of what maintains our health as human beings. High tech quick fixes are not a path to spiritually or socially evolve as a species.. in order to truly liberate our human race we must first liberate the mind and the heart, which requires reconnecting with the living planet Earth. Greer talks about meditation and the living planet (which is great) but then he shows these CGI renderings of some future he depicts and describes as a glorious golden age for humanity and it shows these giant hydroponic growing operations with robots, I think while that kind of cultivation may be helpful in some situations, we should be focusing on real living soil, regenerating the soil and creating food forests (as the ancients did) before anything else. I do look forward to that film he is putting out this year though (The Lost Century) but I have my reservations about the high tech quick fix agriculture stuff he puts on a pedestal.
Blimey! Gavin, you write so well, and so fast! I humbly concede, without the slightest resent, to a far better writer and much deeper and more thorough thinker. This is an extremely worthwhile topic, make no mistake, and you have chosen your mission well indeed. Because it is clear that this is your mission, and I wish you every success. But we both know that it's an exceedingly difficult one.
Thanks again for the link to "Bright Green Lies." That's another one to add to my growing reading list. My own awareness of the fraudulent state of the environmental movement, the form that I have since learnt it has been remodeled into since the 60s and early 70s, began in earnest when I worked at an academic research institute almost twenty years ago. While I accumulated my own anecdotal evidence, principally from my observations of how so much about physical and planetary science academia had degenerated by way of the corrupting influence of politicised funding, I also came across the work of Bjørn Lomborg and his book "The Skeptical Environmentalist" (2001), which seemed even to my etiolated mind to have more soundly argued and better substantiated premises than the universal "climate change" motive repeated like a mantra by academics, as well as any government mouthpiece or environmental/climate change cultist.
I should have watched the video with Steven Greer before responding, but I thought I'd respond to your output first and foremost.
"High tech quick fixes are not a path to spiritually or socially evolve as a species.. in order to truly liberate our human race we must first liberate the mind and the heart, which requires reconnecting with the living planet Earth."
Without qualification, this is the prayer-ender. This is where it begins, and ends for me. There's almost nothing else, unless we're decided on rummaging through the details.
The pursuance of greater and cheaper energy is a fool's errand and a assured bearing toward downfall.
"... we should be focusing on real living soil, regenerating the soil and creating food forests (as the ancients did) before anything else."
The greatest, perhaps the only genuine sacrilege is the contemporary denial of fundamental, elemental and inviolable human cohesion and dependence on the soil, water, and air - being the very matter we and all life has emerged from. All that prattle about bio-digital convergence and the managed evolution of the human species by human ingenuity itself is such absurd nonsense from insufferably shameless and hubristic, and thoroughly obnoxious intellectual poseurs and imposters.
I'm repeating here what I've posted elsewhere, so I hope you'll forgive me for commending myself:
People blithely adopt and absorb technology, however potentially hazardous it might be, into their homes and merge it into their work and play practices, their lives and into their very bodies, without the least effort in considered examination as to what purpose might be for its existence, nor especially whether it is even necessary. I'm not advocating for conversion to Ludditism (though I certainly won't denounce the spirit I assume gave rise to it), but why have we not as individuals, or collectively as a society, made a determination to define clearly for ourselves, our families, our communities and society what might be considered appropriate technology, and what the appropriate level of mechanisation/instrumentation/electrification/etc. that is to be tolerated, but not one skerrick more? Instead what we have demonstrated is an unconscious, bovine laisser passer with technology. We've foolishly allowed the advertisers (actually, those whom the advertisers work for and who own the agencies) to decide for us, make these determinations, and to steer us into behaving exactly as the bastards want us to.
But as far as one of the overarching themes of the subject is concerned - that there might be paradigm-changing scientific conjectures, maybe even entirely unrevealed fields of inquiry, and revolutionary technologies that have been sequestered by the (deep-) state and concealed - this is very likely true. Firstly because the masters of governments, who are also the originators, executors, trustees and beneficiaries of the deep state, are irreverent mercantilists, of the most rapacious and blood-sucking variety imaginable, and they unwaveringly seek to maximise profits in whatever racket they already have going. If anything, their calculus has so far been yielding a result of greater profits from kicking the can down the road and continuing to squeeze the juice out of the already picked and over-ripe and shrivelling orange (fossil fuels, and indirectly uranium) than they might be able get out of any new fruit - for the time being.
Despite taking so long to provide this reply, if you were expecting a focused cross-examination and technical appraisal of the technology, then I'm afraid this will be a disappointing read.
Thanks very much for your detailed synopsis and for sharing the links to more comprehensive information. These are undeniably intriguing nascent, groundbreaking technologies that would have far-reaching implications, if the promise were ever realised. I've followed-up the links and downloaded the electronic books and documents, though it will take me some time to read through those sources, and because engineering and fundamental/gravitational physics/mechanics are subjects somewhat out of my wheelhouse (that is despite the fact that I was scientifically trained, and I have some academic and professional attainment, but those formal aspects have all but lapsed from years of non-participation - it's a long story), it will still take a considerable investment of time and effort for me to be able to properly evaluate the scientific and engineering principles and technologies proposed.
Bluntly, to my mind this speculative technology is in the category of the solution looking for a problem to solve. Beyond the "gee-whiz" factor, I just don't see how or why the world needs it, or could in any way benefit from it. On the other hand, long-term there are only down-sides that I can see. It does promises immense power, but while governments exist there's absolutely no chance whatsoever they'd freely allow any civilian to hold and utilise it.
Science and technology increases human power - and magnifies the flaws in human nature. It has enabled us to have higher living standards and live longer, but it has simultaneously brought about the decrease in life gratification and value, and the debasement of community and fellowship. It has enabled us to travel further and faster, but at the cost of devaluing the world and occasioning an insatiable avidity. And because it concentrates into the hands of the rapacious class, at the same time it allows them to wreak immense planetary destruction, and on their fellow humans, it enables them to create misery on an ever larger scale.
PS - have you heard of a book called "Bright Green Lies"?
(the full PDF of the book can be found here: https://archive.org/details/derrick-jensen-bright-green-lies-monkfish-book-publishing-company-2021 )
Thank you for the in depth, perspicacious, insightful and candid comments. I agree with much of what you have shared above and though I do not have time this morning to write a proper response and engaged with you on the viable solutions and vision for the future side of things, I will share a few comments I posted elsewhere that relate to this so you can see how I do share many of your concerns with humans coveting and depending on high tech devices (and I personally intend to lean less and less on high tech in my own life).
Many think electric cars and lithium / cobalt battery powered solar / wind powered houses are a "green" way to keep on living as we have been, but as I illuminated in my comments regarding lithium mining, that is a fallacy. Others are now involved with putting Hot Fusion technology on that same pedestal but in my opinion, it is also a technology that is ripe for abuse.
I would like to express my concerns about the current forms of nuclear fusion being promoted as "green" or "sustainable". The PR sounds great, but underneath the hype, when you take a look at what materials and equipment are required, this kind if hot fusion tech they are working on at ITER can only result in a new kind of energy corporation monopoly. This whole push for hot fusion reactors (and all the billions in tax payer money and other funding sources being spent on it) reminds me of the cancer industry and its endless push for more funding for “research” (scooped up through campaigns and going right into big pharma’s pocket perpetually so they can develop, patent and have a monopoly on brutally expensive chemo drugs etc (while real proven natural cures are blackboxed, ‘fact checked’ or otherwise demonized in some way or ignored because they cannot be patented).
The hot fusion reactors that are being promoted in the mainstream news/academic circles right now are extremely wasteful in how much energy is required to operate them (for the high-powered lasers). Also, even if they could create a chain reaction that was self-sustaining, it would still require extremely expensive specialized equipment and materials. For instance, one gram of deuterium is currently costing more than a gram of gold to produce and tritium is being estimated to cost $2 billion per kilogram produced (requiring lithium to be produced, which again means depending on a finite resource, that is strip mined etc). If these hot fusion reactors were adopted and developed to plug into our existing power grid it would result in existing centralized energy cartels creating monopolies (just like they did with oil) dominating people’s access to the energy the hot fusion devices would create. This is not a wise or responsible solution to our global energy conundrum.
People like Eugene Mallove on the other hand were doing extremely important work on L.E.N.R. (aka “cold fusion”) technologies and exposed the systemic corruption of institutions like MIT (and their actively covering up discoveries pertaining to said scientific developments). See: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6y98YwJ2GEE for more info. The technology he was working on (related to LENRs) would be able to be applied in a decentralized fashion and scaled to the needs of situations globally. That however would threaten the pocket books of some very powerful people, thus Eugene Mallove was killed and here we are with hot fusion being promoted in universities and on the news (as, unlike "cold fusion" tech, hot fusion tech is something that can be monopolized).
The real challenge we face with solving the so called "energy crisis" on Earth is not something that requires billions to be solved, it is more a matter of either taking steps to stop depending on technology that is destroying Mother Earth in each of our lives and/or figuring out a way to get the already extant inventions (which are cheaper, applicable in a decentralized way and scalable to any situation) from our brightest minds past the buzz saw of institutionalized suppression, thievery, and murderous operations that have stunted human ingenuity in this field of study and engineering for many decades now. https://fas.org/blogs/secrecy/2010/10/invention_secrecy_2010/ Since I have no confidence in our ability to get around the murderous mechanisms of truly clean, efficient, scalable and decentralized energy technologies, I am opting for withdrawing my support from the technological infrastructure and refraining from buying any future gadgets now that I know what I know about lithium, cobalt, tantalum and tungsten.
Many have unconsciously decided that the most they are willing to do is choose what they consider to be the 'least' destructive and toxic industries which will allow them to continue to live a life of comfort and high tech toys.
I often invite them to consider the third option of not supporting either industry. I am certainly not there yet as I am typing this message on a desktop computer tied into an industrial electrical grid but I intend on heading in that direction. I could list a few dozen other technologies that could replace, oil, lithium batteries, nuclear, solar, wind and hydroelectric energy corporations. Have you ever heard of Dimitri Petronov? He had developed a plasma battery the size of a shoebox that powered his entire two bedroom house and all the appliances in it for over a year without a single recharge, but after some visits from "investors" and then military/intelligence types, he disappeared and his body was later found in the Volga river. Sadly, his story is not unique, Dr. Eugene Mallove (MIT, mentioned above and shown in the video linked above) and Dr. Aries M. DeGeus were also doing some promising work on plasma energy generation and storage tech, and both of them also ended up dead. http://www.rexresearch.com/articles2/thorium.htm Then there are other technologies that are even cleaner such as Stanley Meyer's water fuel cell, or the countless toroidal geometry based energy extraction devices that tap into the quantum vacuum and produce usable electricity without requiring any fuel or mining. Considering the massive global industries and oligarchs that are opposed to energy generation/storage tech coming out that would threaten their monopolies (and considering all the people they have murdered and bribed to keep it that way over the decades), I do not think it is realistic for us to hope for any large scale energy device manufacturing revolution to be able to supply us with the energy we need to keep living with all our gadgets and high tech addictions (while still claiming to value protecting nature and respecting Mother Earth).
I often point out to people the fact that that humans have existed for millennia without electricity and a great many of them lived fulfilling lives of purpose, creativity, grace, courage and spiritual growth. The inherent built in perspective that sees cities and industrial electrical grids as being something we must perpetuate (via either conventional means or more "sustainable" alternatives) misses the point that there is a third option. The third option is refusing to participate in funding the destruction of Mother Earth's body and innocent children (such as those that work in the Cobalt mines in the Congo to get the rare metals required to make these smart devices we are reading and writing on now) and being willing to make the sacrifice of letting go of our high tech addictions and creature comforts to live a more simple life in close symbiotic connection with the living Earth where we live (as our ancestors did). Many will not be willing to do that, and will make excuses why we must continue to buy high tech gadgets, build out cities and power the industrial power grid as the real ethical alternative is something they are not willing to consider. In the end it all boils down to if we believe that our comfort and enjoyment is worth more than the lives of children in the Cobalt mines and the integrity of the ecosystems all over the world that are being strip mined and poisoned so we can continue to live comfortably in the "developed" world.
Thus, as I said above for me , it all boils down to the fact that those that wish to walk a path guided by any kind of honest moral compass (including but not limited to the permaculture ethical imperative of People Care-Earth Care-Future Care) are going to have to make some hard choices if we want our actions to continue to align with the principles we espouse and claim to live by.
It's easier to sink a boat when you get all the people to run to one side of it.
You can't sink a bird tho, it must be drowned
Linda Yaccarino was also a director and chairman of the US Advertising Council, a long-time tool of the liberal-fascist Council on Foreign Relations network. Here's some background from the early 1960s. Same script, different season:
"The Advertising Council serves as a public relations operation to promote selected projects supported by the Council on Foreign Relations (CFR) and its interlocking affiliates. It was created in 1942 as a tax-exempt, non-governmental agency to promote wartime programs of government: rationing, salvage, the selling of war bonds, and so on.
The Advertising Council continued after the war to perform this same service: selecting, for free promotion, projects that are "importantly in the public interest." Thus, officials of the Advertising Council (many of whom are CFR members) have become czars in a most important field. They arbitrarily decide what is, and what is not, in the public interest...creating and saturating the media with the skillful propaganda that "sells" the project to the public...
The Advertising Council has promoted the "mental health" project, which, superficially, appears to be an admirable effort...but whose underlying and dubious purpose is to promote the passage, in all states, of "mental health" laws fabricated by international socialists in the World Health Organization and in the U.S. Public Health Service.
These laws, to "facilitate access to hospital care" for mentally ill people, provide no new facilities, prescribe no better treatment, nor do anything else to relieve the suffering of sick people. The new "mental health" laws...eliminate the constitutional safeguards of a person accused of being mentally ill, thus making it easier for bureaucrats, political enemies and selfish relatives to commit him and get him out of the way."
Source: Dan Smoot, "The Invisible Government" (1962) modernhistoryproject.org/mhp?Article=InvisibleGov&C=6.0
From the Ad Council history timeline: "Our current projects reflect the Ad Council’s ongoing commitment to core issues including mental health, health equity, racial justice and diversity, equity and inclusion, and alongside our incredible partners, we won’t stop..." adcouncil.org/our-story/our-history
Thank you for identifying and delving into the sources, and for the expansion.
Don't forget the 50 million Ad Fund campaign they did all over the TV and radio called "It's Up to You" trying to push everyone to get vaccinated. They called it building vaccine confidence for those on the fence. I barely ever watch TV or radio and still seemed to see a bunch of them blasted all over public spaces. Sick
Nothing good comes from the CFR (Council on Foreign Relations).
They're just as creepy as the WEF.
Only, they don't rock the James Bond villian outfits like Klaus Schwab.
How ironic and Freudian that the psychopaths in the WHO would want to promote a "mental health" project for mentally ill people whose only purpose is to eliminate them and their constitutional rights and are the basis of their "red flag" laws.
We should all know by now that any thing these unconstitutional NGOs and agencies do is a trojan horse for some other nefarious purpose, and not what they disguise it as.
Ending their funding is the only solution.
Why people expected anything better from a guy who shills cars that incinerate their owners is beyond me.
Also, in order to build the malfunctioning (and/or weaponized cars) he is funding the destruction of some of the last pristine ecosystems on Earth. Musk's money and other billionaires that are hungry for lithium and cobalt are now targeting my backyard in Ontario.
I have compiled the following intel for anyone that lives in northern Ontario, Quebec, near any of the Great Lakes and also for anyone that cares about the Boreal Forest.
The pictures I uploaded here https://archive.org/details/blood4lithiumborealforestpillaging show a couple of the areas that have been purchased by mining corporations and what they intend on doing with that land starting this year.
The Boreal Forest is being assaulted even now in northern Ontario and Quebec but what they plan on doing starting this year and going forward is truly horrifying.
Over 217,000 Hectares of forest, lakes and rivers have been purchased by lithium mining corporations that intend to strip mine in northern Ontario and Quebec (I provide a breakdown of which companies have purchased what land below).
Hard rock lithium mining involves deforestation, draining lakes and rivers, blowing the land into pieces with explosives, carving deep gashes into the Earth with giant machines, using truckloads of industrial solvents like sulfuric acid (resulting in water contamination with toxic sludge) dragging that processed rubble to processing facilities with fleets of heavy machinery then processing the ore with extremely high energy furnaces using another slew of toxic chemicals (which further contaminate the water table, lakes, rivers and ocean elsewhere).
To extract one ton of lithium, you need to contaminate approximately 500,000 gallons of water. Lithium mining also destroys the soil structure and leads to unsustainable water table reduction. In the end, it depletes water resources, leaving the land too dry and exposing ecosystems to the risk of extinction.
The long term results are water loss, ground destabilization, biodiversity loss, increased salinity of rivers, contaminated soil, massive PM 2.5 emissions and toxic waste. Some of the most common lithium mining wastes are sulfuric acid discharge and the radioactive uranium byproduct (which leaches into the ground water, streams, rivers and lakes). They can cause various forms of cancer and diseases. The mining also presents other serious problems like large amounts of lime and magnesium wastes.
As Lithium extraction causes surface water contamination, it also destroys other water sources. So, it’s also responsible for the creation of toxic rain. The water cycle largely depends on the limited forests. The trees extract underground water and release it into the atmosphere for this process to continue. Therefore, lithium mining hinders the water cycle from providing adequate rainfall in the affected areas. The impacts are severe. The long term result will be increased regional droughts, soil erosion and the risk of desertification.
Lithium miners cut down trees and remove all other life forms from their targeted mining areas to eliminate obstructions.
Strip mining and deforestation is not something that can be undone. It means the decimation of ancient diverse ecosystems, the poisoning of the sacred waters and extinction of species and so there is nothing “sustainable”, “renewable” or “green” about it.
𝗛𝗲𝗿𝗲 𝗶𝘀 𝗮 𝗹𝗶𝘀𝘁 𝗼𝗳 𝘀𝗼𝗺𝗲 𝗼𝗳 𝘁𝗵𝗲 𝗛𝗮𝗿𝗱 𝗥𝗼𝗰𝗸 𝗟𝗶𝘁𝗵𝗶𝘂𝗺 𝗠𝗶𝗻𝗲𝘀 𝘁𝗵𝗮𝘁 𝗮𝗿𝗲 𝗽𝗹𝗮𝗻𝗻𝗲𝗱 𝘁𝗼 𝗯𝗲 𝗰𝗮𝗿𝘃𝗲𝗱 𝗶𝗻𝘁𝗼 𝘁𝗵𝗲 𝗕𝗼𝗿𝗲𝗮𝗹 𝗙𝗼𝗿𝗲𝘀𝘁 𝘀𝘁𝗮𝗿𝘁𝗶𝗻𝗴 𝗶𝗻 𝟮𝟬𝟮𝟯:
1- Ultra Lithium – intends to destroy 2,416+ hectares of land around Forgan Lake and Georgia Lake (near Thunder Bay, Ontario).
2- International lithium corporation – intends to destroy 47,700 hectares (477 square kilometers) of boreal forest around Raleigh Lake (located near Ignace, Ontario)
3- Fairservice Lithium – intends to destroy 2,544 hectares of boreal forest around Mavis Lake, Ontario
4- Peggy Group – intends to destroy 7,386 hectares of boreal forest located about 80km north of Sioux Lookout, in the province of Ontario.
5- Rock Edge – intends to destroy 6378 hectares of boreal forest (in their combined “Maun” and “Terrier” properties) between the East Wabigoon and English River, in Ontario.
6- The Hearst Project – intends to destroy 29,805 hectares of land located roughly 15 kilometers south of Hearst, Ontario.
7- Frontier Lithium’s PAK Project (involving Green Technology Metals corporation)- intends to destroy 67,800 hectares of boreal forest near Red Lake (with two subsidiary projects called “Seymour” and “Root”).
8- Vancouver’s “Lithium One Metals” and Critical Elements Corporation – intend to destroy 53,000+ hectares (530 km2) of boreal forest in Northern Ontario and the James Bay side of Quebec.
—————————————–
This is not a comprehensive list, there are many more mines planned for the areas listed above (and all over Canada in the Boreal Forest zone). I just got emotionally exhausted after spending half a day reading the lithium mining company’s press releases where they were bragging about having rights to begin blasting the land to pieces soon for profit (and bragging about having paid off the locals and having made them sign binding contracts so they cannot complain about environmental/health damages in future years) so I had to stop researching for the day.
The boreal forest is teeming with life (containing about two thirds of Canada’s 140 000 species of plants, animals, and micro-organisms.) To describe it, let’s begin with the trees that make up the forest canopy. There are about 20 species of them (including but not limited to Spruce, fir, pine, and tamarack, trembling aspen, balsam poplar, birch and more). The boreal plays a critical role in how the planet breathes through the process of photosynthesis. By extension, it also shapes the composition of the atmosphere, which today includes maintaining 21 percent of the life supporting concentrations of oxygen in our atmosphere.
The boreal forest shelters more than 85 species of mammals, including some of the largest and most majestic—wood bison, elk, moose, woodland caribou, grizzly and black bears, and wolves—and smaller species, such as beavers, snowshoe hares, Canada lynx, red squirrels, lemmings, and voles.
Nearly half of the birds in North America rely on the boreal forest at some time during the year. It is estimated that at least 3 billion landbirds, water birds, and shorebirds breed in the boreal forest each year, representing more than 300 species. Another 300 million birds, including several species of shorebirds, swans, and geese, breed farther north and travel through the boreal forest during migration. It is estimated that 32 000 insect species inhabit Canada’s boreal forest, although about one third of these species have yet to be described. Canada’s boreal forest is home to about 130 species of fish (including minnows, stickleback and Larger species such as including walleye, northern pike, lake trout, Arctic grayling, yellow perch, brook trout, whitefish and burbot).
In order to illustrate the potential for catastrophic harm to ecosystems and human health that these mines pose I present a cautionary tale: The Liqi River was once full of fish: Almost none are left. Chemical spills from the Ganzizhou Rongda lithium mine have killed many. “The whole river stank, and it was full of dead yaks and dead fish,” said one villager.: “Masses” of dead fish covered the river. The people got the mine shut down three times, only to have the government reopen it. ( for more info : https://tibetnature.net/en/lichu-river-poisoned-case-minyak-lhagang-lithium-mine-protest/?fbclid=IwAR2ulyVpJ3DR3tYOwX6wW4MkZy1elR6bjNpS03B4f4jF32LcAjdNvekjU0c )
One of the elders said, “Old people, we see the mines and we cry. What are the future generations going to do? How are they going to survive? ”. A local activist surveyed people in the area. Even if mining companies split the profits and promised to repair the land after the mines are exhausted, the Tibetans wanted no part of it. “God is in the mountains and the rivers, these are the places that spirits live,” he explained.” “sustainable development” technology (Lithium battery tech) offers everything: every luxury, every whim, available at the touch of a ‘carbon-free’ button. But the world that these technologies provide will be a rotting, desecrated, and, finally, dead world if we let them continue on their crusade to turn the living world into dead things, for profit and to perpetuate our obscene technologically addicted western “civilized society”.
In the concentrations extracted via industrial mining operations, lithium is harmful to living beings. It interferes with sperm viability, causes birth defects, memory problems, kidney failure, movement disorders, and so on. Other materials in an electric-car battery can be even more harmful than lithium, with nickel and cobalt electrodes being the most destructive component.
As I covered in a past comment, about half of the cobalt used in lithium batteries comes from the Democratic Republic of the Congo, where 40,000 children as young as four are essentially enslaved in mines, carrying backbreaking loads in conditions of intense heat, with no safety equipment, under abusive managers and guards, for a wage of a dollar a day.
Here in Canada, we may end up paying our cobalt miners more money and they may be wearing steel toes and hard hats, but the impacts on the ecosystem, the lakes, rivers and future generations will be just as devastating.
There’s no circumventing the fact that these energy-storage technologies are fundamentally destructive. And they’re dependent on a global supply chain and advanced manufacturing technologies that, themselves, are fundamentally destructive. Machines making machines making machines; and while more and more hyperbolic “green” headlines are written, the planet is being murdered so we can have fun playing on i-pads and e-scooters.
Next on the hit list for corporate pillaging in the name of “sustainable development” is the Boreal Forest of Canada.
As described above, our corrupt corporation captured government is helping to initiate large projects to pillage the lands of indigenous peoples (Cree of Eeyou Istchee, the Shakopaatikoong peoples of the Slate Falls first nation and the Waabitigweyaang peoples of Sandy Lake, among others ) and the body of Mother Earth in new Lithium (cobalt and tantalum) mines in northern Ontario and Quebec.
I have been reaching out to the Indigenous leaders in northern Ontario but so far the only two that got back to me told me that the mining companies had sent in teams of people to their town hall meetings and convinced most of the people in their community how beneficial the mines were going to be for them financially, sadly, this seems to have convinced many of them to lay down, take the money and not fight this. I am not gonna give up though..
Given the nature of open pit mining, lithium leeching ponds and lithium refining, the inevitable result will be large scale poisoning of the water table and the ocean in James bay, contamination of the great lakes (through lake Superior, moving downstream into all the other great lakes), deforestation and genocide of local wildlife.
These corporations intend to clear cut the boreal forest, annihilating the little bit of remaining habitat that exists in Ontario for the moose, caribou, the lynx, bears, the mountain lion, wolves, fox, bobcats, eagles, hawks and countless other winged and four legged beings.
The fish in the lakes, the whales and countless other beings in James bay, they will all be decimated by these projects.
These corporations appear to be moving in fast and as quiet as possible (paying off locals with bribes along the way and getting them to sign binding agreements) to avoid local and environmentalist resistance.
These projects will mean we trade blood for lithium so we can have fun i-pads and electric cars to play with. We will be trading the ancient beauty and majesty of the Boreal forest and all it’s inhabitants for smart phones and tesla cars. I can’t help but ask myself this question… Is it really worth it?
Those that wish to walk a path guided by any kind of honest moral compass (including but not limited to the permaculture ethical imperative of People Care-Earth Care-Future Care) are going to have to make some hard choices in the coming years if we want our actions to continue to align with the principles we espouse and claim to live by.
You are a colossus, may your courage and strength be boundless. Yours is the noblest of fights, I hope you achieve a quick victory, but my greater hope is that you attain absolute victory.
Thank you for the kind words and well wishes. I stand on the shoulders of giants so I cannot take all the credit and see many others engaging in other noble (and equally important) endeavors (which are different than the endeavors I am engaged with) but I will strive to do my best to live up to your generous description of my efforts.
Thank you for sharing all this info
-any way you can share your information out to a wider audience? maybe start your own stack? Important stuff
Greetings Buckminister.
Thanks for reading and for the thoughtful comment.
I do have my own substack newsletter and blog (and I am also about to publish a book).
I covered all the material in the comments above and also included a broader historical exploration of the driving psychological mechanisms and worldviews/belief systems that led us to where we are (many being willing to trade blood for lithium so we can continue to live comfortably while lying to themselves and calling it "green" and "sustainable") in this article:
https://gavinmounsey.substack.com/p/the-rise-of-anthropocentrism-bright
I look forward to hearing what you think of my other essays on substack as well.
thank you that's great to hear- I look forward to checking out your stack and look forward to your book ! tx for leaning into this topic - again very important to reframe and properly ground the entire conversation
😆🙄😣😯 Not funny. But funny in its own weird way. Totally agree.
Yes, you did, and yes, you were right. I do know Elon Musk was an intelligence asset and frontman...but was kinda hoping he had a change of allegiance.
NOPE.
Twitter is gonna be the encircling snake.
another social media culdesac
No one should be surprised. Yup, you nailed it.
A lot of people came at me hard over this, so let's see who is going to admit they were duped in the comments section.
You certainly do try hard searching for the bones in this flim-flam. There aren't any and never were, to be sure, but I don't think that will deter your optimism.
Here is a simple metric with which to gauge whether your candidate sociopolitical deliverer, redeemer, emancipator and champion is the real deal, or just another charlatan: did COVID-19 result in a consolidation or boost in their profits/wealth/influence/power? If it did, you're pinning your hopes on another quisling.
"I think we are totally fucked unless Trump somehow gets into office in 2024 and deports all illegals and builds a 50’ concrete wall."
Good grief, Trump is an operator in precisely the same fraudulent, murderous government/bureaucratic/political apparatus as all his predecessors and faux-opponents. There is no "unless" while we permit this system to remain. Trump has no ambition to change a system that promotes and elevates and stokes his vainglory, and he has no genuine plan to materially change anything to the general benefit of all. Just as with any limited hangout, he throws some saccharine candy to the public, and while the people are bamboozled, the hornswoggle keeps advancing.
You are correct in your assessment of how totally fegged we are though, but there are simply no meaningful repairs possible in the present/past/ever government/bureaucratic/political system - the reforms are all only ever just window-dressing - regardless of who ascends to the presidency.
And you're a sport, to boot! Hat tip to you, my friend!
This is about control, not only about a "revenue stream". Communism is a monopoly on everything, including your thought.
Tucker Carlson is a Judas mare whose goal and purpose is to usher the blind sheeple info Musk’s X world. Tucker was a Fox psyop…his repetitious, inappropriate and utterly fake cackle (worse than Kamala) was a psychological trick aimed at the desensitization of serious topics/issues. Tucker pretended (?) to eat bugs with a WEF/UN “chef” shortly before leaving Fox and claiming they were “delicious!” Tucker is a fraud…a globalist…and his partnership with Musk proves it. Hopefully his devotees will wake up and not follow him to Twitter/X world where they will be “assimilated.”
I am very disappointed with Tucker and his landing on Twitter with Musk. I will not follow him there. I thought that he would make a better choice.
Tucker is a globalist…he has finally revealed his hand. We have to relinquish attachments to anyone in conventional media and in the conventional world at large. There is no facet that is not corrupt. Thinking for yourself, walking with Jesus, and relying on God’s truth…seeing the world through a Biblical worldview…is the only way to navigate the evil permeating the world in which we live.
How convenient it also is that WEF etal will be taking over Twitter at a time to kept all the Biden crimes from seeing “public square” daylight. 🙄
Yes, of course. That is why i termed Twitter as a limited hangout social media platform like most of the others.
Do you really think the CIA & Deep State would "sell" their Twitter to a real free speech player? Do you think they need money? Of course not. The whole thing was kabuki theater when Musk pretended to renege on deal, and then they finally settled.
Plain as day for anyone paying attention.
☝🏻🎯
Those who control the money printing machine will never run out of money. This is about control. Free speech was already dead but it's a little more dead today.
So we stop accepting their money. It was always theirs any way, and in accepting it, we've made it the measure of everything - even our very blood - and allowed ourselves to be enslaved.
We walk-out on them, their money, their governments, en masse, and we start using alternatives, and when/where a suitable or sufficient one can't be found, we invent one. And then another. We starve the beast as we re-make the world.
Let's face it, they own the game, they own the rules, they own the outcome. Let them keep it, for what it's worth, and we'll instead make our own.
Everything Elon has said to date about tyranny and free speech is washed away into oblivion with his newly appointed CEO WEF puppet. There is NO QUESTION now that he is part of that system and a bald faced liar.
Solid post, it's been clear to anyone paying attention that both Musk *and* Tucker are controlled opposition and one shouldn't put one's faith in either of them. I did a deep dive on them yesterday collaborating many of the points you've made: https://neofeudalreview.substack.com/p/how-trustworthy-are-elon-musk-and
As with “his” Tesla electric cars, which ultimate goal is not to mandate such cars as future ownership but rather complete elimination of private cars usage, other creations of “his” serve only the continuous progress of "one fits all" products and services of the planned technocracy nightmare. One Health, One Truth, One Internet of Everything, One Gender, One Religion. ONE PRISON!
And all that with population’s consent and acceptance.
What else has to happen for people to see the obvious?
While your constant reminder "don't comply" applied by most would solve all these problems peacefully and without bloodshed in no time.
Will we ever grow up to preserve ourselves? One sure thing is that no external salvation force is coming to do it for us.
Unless you believe in man-made religion which was created to give mankind a false sense of security in daily life and salvation from Hell. The way things are going now and will most likely end up being in the years to come, we're already in Hell.
Absolutely agree. We are being perceptually steered into equivalent of biblical hell.
100% Life's a stockyard. Most of us just aren't aware who are the goats & who are the cattle. Musky has bombed Kanada for months with ads promising his newest ponzi scheme (just because he loves 🇨🇦) will result in Canadians not having to work. I've never looked into it- that's all I needed to hear. Now he hires Wefs media PR shill for future of work to run the prop for $8 worth of "free speech"? I can't wait for the next episode.
Yup. "Earth is a farm. We are someone else's property," Charles Fort (1874-1932).
Why do we elevate these elites to such stratospheric levels and worship them as gods? By definition they are not smart. If they were smart, they would align with God and not with Satan. If Elon Musk believes that the EpiPen is the cure for auto-immune reactions to a foreign synthetic spike protein that the bodies of the injected have been programmed to manufacture ad-infinitum, he is a moron.
I wonder if Elon thinks that these can be cured with an EpiPen?
High School Children with skin injuries after COVID-19 vaccination - 13 painful cases
https://makismd.substack.com/p/high-school-children-with-skin-injuries?utm_medium=email
Also, it's looking like Mrna was a false. Potentially covy was anthrax based. George Webb is working on this. (his podcasts the last week). No idea what is in the injections, but several batches tested did not have MRNA. Several peeps i have talked too, also did not receive COLD injection, which was supposed to protect the Mrna from degradation. Enjoy the nano-goo!
They have no doubt made the deployment very complex. People are dying and are having severe auto immune reactions to some kind of foreign synthetic particle, no doubt the induced spike protein. Suffice to say their intent is wicked, and they hope to cover the genocide as long as possible. Like Jonestown and Waco, in the collapse of the cult, and this is the biggest and oldest cult, they will kill and burn down all they can. There is no exaggeration in the phrase, "This is biblical"!
While it is an extremely complicated and intricate story, it is in fact graspable and, in being the work of the human mind - though criminally-insane minds, to be sure - with concentrated effort we may indeed be able to understand it. But please do not make the error of over-simplifying or dismissing the troves of information available, and the truly heroic work done of those who have dredged the information from the murky abyss.
Sasha Latypova in particular, though there will be others, has exposed the manufacturing procedures and, more importantly, how they run resolutely counter to responsible, ethical manufacturing principles. Study Sasha's work and you will better understand the injections and why there might not be any, or very little, "MRNA" in them (how you should refer to this is an sLNP-encased mRNA encoding a modified hybrid viral capsule-derived spike protein - a mouthful, to be sure, but details are important).
I urge you to seek clarification in Sasha's work, but if I may repeat of my understandings that I've written elsewhere, Pfizer's COVID-19 injection manufacturing process is intentionally imprecise and the volumes of the material produced each time is so large that it is nigh on impossible to maintain precise control of the composition of the product the results. Accordingly, the incidence of largely "blank" shots and the clean bills of health in about 80% of those who have been injected by these mRNA gene transfection shots is likely to have been a result of the injection they received containing predominantly, if not entirely, the aqueous layer of the sLNP suspension. The other 20% of people injected with these shots were not so lucky. If this is a correct reading of the investigation's findings (again, you should verify) then intentionally injecting people with saline as a placebo was not necessary - an effective placebo was baked into the cake with the separation of the sLNP-encased spike protein mRNA suspension's components.
I have followed Sasha. Thanks for your thorough reply.
And I tend to agree with the pfizer lot, being how you describe; LNP + stuff. Also take note, that there were about 12 Subcontractors that made ingredients for the shots.
Emergent BioSolutions is one such company (referenced in RFK's book, with it's own appalling safety/purity record). Founder El-Hibri, is buddies with Kadlec. Their flagship product circa ~2000, BioThrax®, an anthrax 'vaccine'. Likely there is Multiple junk floating around in the Slow Kill BioWeapons. And as you say, the various levels of synthetic caca, will distribute wherever causing damage. Thank you again. (edit: 1 typo)
Please accept my apologies, you are clearly better informed - actually, your knowledge and awareness seems of a higher order, indeed! - than the impression I received and what I understood your post above to convey.
Apologies again, and thank you for sharing these intricate details. They are invaluable in the resolving of the entire diabolical jig-saw puzzle, and I hope you'll continue your researches to the end.
no worries. call it like you see it.
lol. Elon now a doctor 🙄
Think his photo op in the Baphomet outfit speaks volumes about his character.
This might be an ad hominem of sorts but for me anyone who genuinely thought covid-shots, masks or lockdowns, mandates etc.. were good ideas, or who went along with them willingly and hasn't yet regretted those decisions (or realized that they were duped) basically has no standing when it comes to their ethical, social or political opinions.
That doesn't mean I agree with everyone who opposed the measures (or their reasons why) but at least they're not the authoritarians.
All billionaires are in the club as the banks hold their money and play by their rules!:
The harlot controls them all!:
https://sumofthyword.com/2021/01/07/mystery-babylon-the-great-and-her-beast/