I've seen too many examples of the US lying and the Russians providing the goods to trust the US anymore in these matters. (I'm an American.) The most clear example of what Putin was saying about Western European countries following the US's requests was when the biological labs were uncovered, manifests and inventory sheets produced tha…
I've seen too many examples of the US lying and the Russians providing the goods to trust the US anymore in these matters. (I'm an American.) The most clear example of what Putin was saying about Western European countries following the US's requests was when the biological labs were uncovered, manifests and inventory sheets produced that showed the US HAD biological agents there being worked on. All of the countries (including the US) attacked on non-evidentiary grounds, because they had NOTHING left to deny. They COULDN'T DENY! And collectively, after Russia produced the goods, NATO and US teams REFUSED to hold another meeting, in which I'm sure Russia would have produced MORE evidence.
If you're unwilling to address the truth, then why trust you?
I also look at how (in reality, now, NOT as the MSM spins it) Putin's forces have exercised WAY more restraint than Ukraining forces in how they handle prisoners, and civilians. Indeed, while not reported, shelling evidence on buildings in the Donbas region showed damage originating from the Ukrain side. Why would they shell their own people? This goes to the point Putin was making regarding ethnic regions being hated/targeted by pro-Nazification forces.
I think Putin could have better answered Tucker's questions regarding the Christian leadership point by highlighting his restraint in comparison to Ukrain troops. He DID answer well about the need to defend oneself.
I appreciate his restraint several times in divulging info that is not his to divulge. Leave the blame with who it is that can divulge it. That seems to be based on principled trust. The sad thing is he's admitting that it's the deep state that is fomenting ongoing conflict because they're the ones "in control", as evidenced by talks with presidents, and reality being opposite to what is agreed to.
Victoria Nuland's intercepted phone call didn't come up once, and it would have been easy to show evidence of US involvement in Ukraine affairs.
Boris Johnson was properly exposed. I hope that sinks him permanently.
Well, for all the "fakeness" you profess, NATO and the US were sure offended that the manifests were produced. I'm left however, to question what you're saying as all of this being entirely faked by the CIA. The CIA doesn't fake the production of documented proof being used against itself, right? Am I supposed to believe the CIA is so OMNIPOTENT that they'd control even their own enemies' responses to their own planted material?
I happen to believe in someone beyond "their ascended masters", and they will be cut down before too long. They will be exposed for who they are, and what they stand for. They serve a dark master. They lose in the end.
I've seen too many examples of the US lying and the Russians providing the goods to trust the US anymore in these matters. (I'm an American.) The most clear example of what Putin was saying about Western European countries following the US's requests was when the biological labs were uncovered, manifests and inventory sheets produced that showed the US HAD biological agents there being worked on. All of the countries (including the US) attacked on non-evidentiary grounds, because they had NOTHING left to deny. They COULDN'T DENY! And collectively, after Russia produced the goods, NATO and US teams REFUSED to hold another meeting, in which I'm sure Russia would have produced MORE evidence.
If you're unwilling to address the truth, then why trust you?
I also look at how (in reality, now, NOT as the MSM spins it) Putin's forces have exercised WAY more restraint than Ukraining forces in how they handle prisoners, and civilians. Indeed, while not reported, shelling evidence on buildings in the Donbas region showed damage originating from the Ukrain side. Why would they shell their own people? This goes to the point Putin was making regarding ethnic regions being hated/targeted by pro-Nazification forces.
I think Putin could have better answered Tucker's questions regarding the Christian leadership point by highlighting his restraint in comparison to Ukrain troops. He DID answer well about the need to defend oneself.
I appreciate his restraint several times in divulging info that is not his to divulge. Leave the blame with who it is that can divulge it. That seems to be based on principled trust. The sad thing is he's admitting that it's the deep state that is fomenting ongoing conflict because they're the ones "in control", as evidenced by talks with presidents, and reality being opposite to what is agreed to.
Victoria Nuland's intercepted phone call didn't come up once, and it would have been easy to show evidence of US involvement in Ukraine affairs.
Boris Johnson was properly exposed. I hope that sinks him permanently.
Well, for all the "fakeness" you profess, NATO and the US were sure offended that the manifests were produced. I'm left however, to question what you're saying as all of this being entirely faked by the CIA. The CIA doesn't fake the production of documented proof being used against itself, right? Am I supposed to believe the CIA is so OMNIPOTENT that they'd control even their own enemies' responses to their own planted material?
Right, yes, they both fought the Nazi's.
I happen to believe in someone beyond "their ascended masters", and they will be cut down before too long. They will be exposed for who they are, and what they stand for. They serve a dark master. They lose in the end.
Think you are so wrong. You need to do much deeper research