I suspect it's more likely that he simply hasn't thought it through clearly; and this is how it came out when he expressed what he thought was a viewpoint that would be acceptable to "both sides".
I wasn't able to find a clear explanation of why it's wrong ON PRINCIPLE (even if it's a miracle cure) to mandate it, so I had a go. I think it's vital that EVERYONE can explain it, but most people need help.
Here's my attempt. Please view and promote it if you think it fundamentally important, as I do.
Desmet is very deceptive. Mass formation "groupthink" can happen in many ways-- such as during the Tulip Bubble. But that's a relatively innocent formation. What Desmet wants to argue is that basically all mass formations are of the same character as "the madness of crowds," however totalitarianism differs from these generic formations in that it involves deliberate and massive censorship and propaganda in order to silence all opposition narratives and opposition force. Desmet on the other hand argues strenuously that there is never a conspiracy to silence opposition that induces the mass formation in the first place. His view makes no sense at all and isn't supported by history.
RFK Jr has expressed opinions that tend toward censorship of 'anti-science' climate views. He has in fact advocated for jailing high-powered industry leaders who are opposed to the consensus reality.
I'd like him to come out and state clearly and distinctly what he thinks of climate science. We all know the answer to that already but he skirts around the truth.
It means the health of multi-jabbed children is a lost cause...mostly because of the brainwashed state of their parents, who continue to insist that their kidsтАЩ autism and severe allergies have nothing to do with the 72 (and counting) injections inflicted upon their little developing bodies.
That is pretty damning! He cleverly with wordplay denounced mandating vaccines only to telegraph that he would.
Thanks for this.
I suspect it's more likely that he simply hasn't thought it through clearly; and this is how it came out when he expressed what he thought was a viewpoint that would be acceptable to "both sides".
I wasn't able to find a clear explanation of why it's wrong ON PRINCIPLE (even if it's a miracle cure) to mandate it, so I had a go. I think it's vital that EVERYONE can explain it, but most people need help.
Here's my attempt. Please view and promote it if you think it fundamentally important, as I do.
https://whatdoino.substack.com/p/whats-wrong-with-the-greater-good
Desmet is very deceptive. Mass formation "groupthink" can happen in many ways-- such as during the Tulip Bubble. But that's a relatively innocent formation. What Desmet wants to argue is that basically all mass formations are of the same character as "the madness of crowds," however totalitarianism differs from these generic formations in that it involves deliberate and massive censorship and propaganda in order to silence all opposition narratives and opposition force. Desmet on the other hand argues strenuously that there is never a conspiracy to silence opposition that induces the mass formation in the first place. His view makes no sense at all and isn't supported by history.
RFK Jr has expressed opinions that tend toward censorship of 'anti-science' climate views. He has in fact advocated for jailing high-powered industry leaders who are opposed to the consensus reality.
I'd like him to come out and state clearly and distinctly what he thinks of climate science. We all know the answer to that already but he skirts around the truth.
It means the health of multi-jabbed children is a lost cause...mostly because of the brainwashed state of their parents, who continue to insist that their kidsтАЩ autism and severe allergies have nothing to do with the 72 (and counting) injections inflicted upon their little developing bodies.