Since Climate change doesn't exist except for the manmade one, their argument is less than moot. Don't take my word (don't you miss those days?), go here blaisevanne.substack.com
Since Climate change doesn't exist except for the manmade one, their argument is less than moot. Don't take my word (don't you miss those days?), go here https://blaisevanne.substack.com/
Guess. (BTW it's mainly driven by the 11-year sun cycle.) I also remark that if the Met people can't get a 5 day forecast right what makes them think they can predict 100 years ahead? We do have 50 years of test cases:
They always have, Rob and most of the sheep stare wide-eyed and nod. Here's an example of the nasty British BLOB - not one in a million would know about it and I guess, outside the group, nobody will chose to read it - and if they did, they wouldn't understand it. I've been in the business for 60+ years so I know what to look for. https://gcs.civilservice.gov.uk/publications/resist-2-counter-disinformation-toolkit/
We have companies that hire the trolls to attack. I found 3-4 recently and even found special grant money to entice new “ journalists”. It’s super obvious especially with the “ sudden death” announcements. Interestingly, it’s almost always young soccer- football players from the U.K. I recently found the E.U. study by McCullough that showed normally they lose 200 a year, due to underlying conditions, but since shots came out, it’s been 1500 a year. I sadly digress. I will call out these hired - evil rats every time. Why else would you defend vehemently, an injection that kills?
Your logic is impeccable ALRS, thank you. It appears that Big Pharma will defend anything that smells like money with any and all weapons to hand. I believe that the excess deaths we are facing are an unfortunate unintended consequence of poor manufacturing quality (TQM), and deterioration from uncontrolled storage and transport, among other obscure elements. But it is clear that extensive health damage has occurred which can only be good for business anyway - I think they could care less. I always follow the money and ask "why now". This is why now IMHO: https://austrianpeter.substack.com/p/a-perfect-storm-the-money-crisis?s=w
Extending your logic - why would a corporation seek to destroy it's customer base unless there are bigger fish to fry? My son had a logical reaction to the initial Vaxx in 2021 - he said: "why would I trust a drug/vaxx when the very manufacturers have so little faith in their product they require government unrestricted indemnity? He went on:
It's not unlike a car dealer who says it might break down or malfunction, but don't worry the government indemnifies us against any such claims you might make! Would you buy the car? QED
Since Climate change doesn't exist except for the manmade one, their argument is less than moot. Don't take my word (don't you miss those days?), go here https://blaisevanne.substack.com/
Climate is always changing but I always ask the eco-warriors what is the percentage of CO2 in the atmosphere? Kills most of them. When it drops to 0.02% plants die. https://austrianpeter.substack.com/p/climate-fraud-exposed-rip-truth-is
Well - what percentage is it today?
I know that it's cyclical. No idea what the percentage is, I do know it isn't what the chicken littles say.
Guess. (BTW it's mainly driven by the 11-year sun cycle.) I also remark that if the Met people can't get a 5 day forecast right what makes them think they can predict 100 years ahead? We do have 50 years of test cases:
https://www.theburningplatform.com/2022/07/17/wrong-again-50-years-of-failed-eco-pocalyptic-predictions/
They are going on lies and hubris. NOT SCIENCE.
They always have, Rob and most of the sheep stare wide-eyed and nod. Here's an example of the nasty British BLOB - not one in a million would know about it and I guess, outside the group, nobody will chose to read it - and if they did, they wouldn't understand it. I've been in the business for 60+ years so I know what to look for. https://gcs.civilservice.gov.uk/publications/resist-2-counter-disinformation-toolkit/
We have companies that hire the trolls to attack. I found 3-4 recently and even found special grant money to entice new “ journalists”. It’s super obvious especially with the “ sudden death” announcements. Interestingly, it’s almost always young soccer- football players from the U.K. I recently found the E.U. study by McCullough that showed normally they lose 200 a year, due to underlying conditions, but since shots came out, it’s been 1500 a year. I sadly digress. I will call out these hired - evil rats every time. Why else would you defend vehemently, an injection that kills?
Your logic is impeccable ALRS, thank you. It appears that Big Pharma will defend anything that smells like money with any and all weapons to hand. I believe that the excess deaths we are facing are an unfortunate unintended consequence of poor manufacturing quality (TQM), and deterioration from uncontrolled storage and transport, among other obscure elements. But it is clear that extensive health damage has occurred which can only be good for business anyway - I think they could care less. I always follow the money and ask "why now". This is why now IMHO: https://austrianpeter.substack.com/p/a-perfect-storm-the-money-crisis?s=w
Extending your logic - why would a corporation seek to destroy it's customer base unless there are bigger fish to fry? My son had a logical reaction to the initial Vaxx in 2021 - he said: "why would I trust a drug/vaxx when the very manufacturers have so little faith in their product they require government unrestricted indemnity? He went on:
It's not unlike a car dealer who says it might break down or malfunction, but don't worry the government indemnifies us against any such claims you might make! Would you buy the car? QED
Cool.
Yes they do. I hate that, but I'm not a scientist. YOU have credentials. Which I think are great.
I'd certainly think you would know.
CO2 is a noble gas, one needed if we are to keep breathing.
It's how the plants and trees breath. ... as you know.
Yes and hearing that others do too is that much nicer.
The “ real” scientists came back from Antarctica recently and said the ice was the thickest in a decade. Don’t hear that on mainstream tv. 🤗
Of course not it won't fit with their narrative.
Somewhere around 400 PPM. If it drops below about 180 life is in big trouble.
Sorry 0.04%! Finger trouble!
Yes Stephen or 0.40% - correct: https://www.theburningplatform.com/2023/04/18/04/
4% I believe
Good try JB, actually it's - 0.04% - but you are in good company if you watch the Twitter from a farmer. I had no idea until I read this! https://www.theburningplatform.com/2023/04/18/04/