R v W is not a law bc it is outside the limits of Constitution and as such the opinion is not Constitutionally binding, irrespective of what SCOTUS or the "law" is considered.
R v W is not a law bc it is outside the limits of Constitution and as such the opinion is not Constitutionally binding, irrespective of what SCOTUS or the "law" is considered.
R v W is not a law bc it is outside the limits of Constitution and as such the opinion is not Constitutionally binding, irrespective of what SCOTUS or the "law" is considered.
Flick what I wrote to any law student and see.
Opinions mean nothing unless they can be enforced.