We’ve long known that those numbers are artificially low because of the use of different ICD codes for essentially the same process. Someone posted details on that quite awhile ago, but can’t locate it now. And early on, many were using codes that nowhere near reflected the COD.
We’ve long known that those numbers are artificially low because of the use of different ICD codes for essentially the same process. Someone posted details on that quite awhile ago, but can’t locate it now. And early on, many were using codes that nowhere near reflected the COD.
We’ve long known that those numbers are artificially low because of the use of different ICD codes for essentially the same process. Someone posted details on that quite awhile ago, but can’t locate it now. And early on, many were using codes that nowhere near reflected the COD.