Can advocates of non-violence please explain why it's better than violence? MLK and Gandhi are not typical in history. They succeeded because their enemies were somewhat civilized. Non-violence wouldn't have worked against the Nazis or any other group of people who want to kill you. They don't care how nice and polite you are, they'll…
Can advocates of non-violence please explain why it's better than violence? MLK and Gandhi are not typical in history. They succeeded because their enemies were somewhat civilized. Non-violence wouldn't have worked against the Nazis or any other group of people who want to kill you. They don't care how nice and polite you are, they'll kill you anyway. Do you really think Schwab and Gates would be deterred from killing you because you're so nice? All this talk about non-violence is a cliche´, and it actually looks like controlled opposition.
Violence should be selective. The minions giving forced vaccinations, showing up at your house to take your guns, airport gatekeepers abusing seniors...these people can be doxxed and re-educated. This has been done in every successful revolution. If you can't get at Hitler, you get his minions.
Agreed. They have those bases covered. Sharing information, following intuition, guidance and setting healthy boundaries to reach out to who is brought into your life each day to touch is key. Promotion of the self can be destructive, addictive and compulsive from experience. Attraction to how you live your life and treat others can open hearts and minds and dispel the demons of mass formation and other lower self phenomena.
Self defense is another story. I seen it posted a hundred times that the key is to wait until they play their hand because at this point they're just trying to provoke and accelerate a response on their terms.
Can advocates of non-violence please explain why it's better than violence? MLK and Gandhi are not typical in history. They succeeded because their enemies were somewhat civilized. Non-violence wouldn't have worked against the Nazis or any other group of people who want to kill you. They don't care how nice and polite you are, they'll kill you anyway. Do you really think Schwab and Gates would be deterred from killing you because you're so nice? All this talk about non-violence is a cliche´, and it actually looks like controlled opposition.
I do not agree feral lunch... Imagine 100 peeps saying "no" at the county meeting,
rather than 100 peeps with a variety of firearms perhaps calling out and threatening
to shoot? Who has the most power? Allow young male volunteers, with a love for
their fellow man from all over the world to act in concert to keep a balance through
expelling certain actors from the planet.
Violence should be selective. The minions giving forced vaccinations, showing up at your house to take your guns, airport gatekeepers abusing seniors...these people can be doxxed and re-educated. This has been done in every successful revolution. If you can't get at Hitler, you get his minions.
@ feral.
I like that, and I agree. TY
it is a losers game ....
Agreed. They have those bases covered. Sharing information, following intuition, guidance and setting healthy boundaries to reach out to who is brought into your life each day to touch is key. Promotion of the self can be destructive, addictive and compulsive from experience. Attraction to how you live your life and treat others can open hearts and minds and dispel the demons of mass formation and other lower self phenomena.
Self defense is another story. I seen it posted a hundred times that the key is to wait until they play their hand because at this point they're just trying to provoke and accelerate a response on their terms.