People have come forward over the last century with many treatments that should have been tested in double blind true placebo peer reviewed control studies against the surgery, radiation and chemo big pharma treatments.
Why not test Dr. William Makis targeted cancer treatment in such a study? Why does the Canadian government not do that, …
People have come forward over the last century with many treatments that should have been tested in double blind true placebo peer reviewed control studies against the surgery, radiation and chemo big pharma treatments.
Why not test Dr. William Makis targeted cancer treatment in such a study? Why does the Canadian government not do that, but instead tries to fine Dr. Makis and put him in jail?
What about Dr. Akbar Khan and his dichloracetate or DCA cancer treatment? Was it welcomed by the powers to be? Speaking of hair loss during chemo, why not do a double blind true placebo peer review control study test of Dr. Khan's SEF chemo treatment so cancer patients DON'T LOSE THEIR HAIR DURING CHEMO?
What about Professor Angus Dalgleish cancer immunotherapy (t-cell boosting) treatment? Was that ever properly tested?
Or Hoxsey cancer treatment?
Or Rene Caisse herbal essaic tea protocol?
Simoncini sodium bicarbonate cancer treatment ever been properly tested?
What about Stanislaw Burzynski cancer treatment?
The Rife machine?
AOH 1996 cancer pill (Dr. Sermed Mezher)?
There is treatments that should be tested, but I don't have time to write it all now. KENNEDY, CAN YOU HEAR ME?
How many others have come forward with better treatment with higher cure rates than cut, burn and poison but only to be taken down by the powers that should not ever have been?
Why do they hire people like Morris Fishbein or Stephen Barret to take down promising cancer treatments rather than study them against big pharma treatments? Could it be $$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$?
Or how about the cancer treatment centers, which use high dose melatonin to protect healthy cells, and then use insulin to therapy to starve cancer cells, and then once blood glucose is down use 1/4th the dose of traditional chemotherapy agents to target now starved cancer cells…then they gradually bring up the blood glucose post chemo treatment, and send their patients home. These patients often also change diets to further starve cancer and add adjunct therapies like high dose melatonin and anti-parasitics. They experience far fewer adverse side effects of chemotherapy.
Personally I believe we would all benefit from eating a very low carb diet to always starve cancer cells, as our immune systems are always targeting abnormal cells and cancer cells thrive on carbs! There are many things everyone should do regarding diet and rest and sunshine and, and, and to protect our immune systems, so cancers don’t ever get a foothold.
It is a tragedy that our insurance will refuse payments when patients opt for any alternative to modern oncology treatment, especially considering the alternatives are cheaper and keep people out of hospitals, regardless of outcomes. The whole system is broken!!!
Not so simple with the carbs. Some cancers can use sugar, methionine (from protein), and fatty acids. And not that many people have been very low carb for a while issues are arising.
But no question that there are a ton of treatments that work that most people don't get, which improve the immune system instead of destroying it. Unfortunately chemo is cheap for anyone with insurance, compared to alternative treatments. I spent $200k on alternative treatments. Not many have that kind of money.
People have come forward over the last century with many treatments that should have been tested in double blind true placebo peer reviewed control studies against the surgery, radiation and chemo big pharma treatments.
Why not test Dr. William Makis targeted cancer treatment in such a study? Why does the Canadian government not do that, but instead tries to fine Dr. Makis and put him in jail?
What about Dr. Akbar Khan and his dichloracetate or DCA cancer treatment? Was it welcomed by the powers to be? Speaking of hair loss during chemo, why not do a double blind true placebo peer review control study test of Dr. Khan's SEF chemo treatment so cancer patients DON'T LOSE THEIR HAIR DURING CHEMO?
What about Professor Angus Dalgleish cancer immunotherapy (t-cell boosting) treatment? Was that ever properly tested?
Or Hoxsey cancer treatment?
Or Rene Caisse herbal essaic tea protocol?
Simoncini sodium bicarbonate cancer treatment ever been properly tested?
What about Stanislaw Burzynski cancer treatment?
The Rife machine?
AOH 1996 cancer pill (Dr. Sermed Mezher)?
There is treatments that should be tested, but I don't have time to write it all now. KENNEDY, CAN YOU HEAR ME?
How many others have come forward with better treatment with higher cure rates than cut, burn and poison but only to be taken down by the powers that should not ever have been?
Why do they hire people like Morris Fishbein or Stephen Barret to take down promising cancer treatments rather than study them against big pharma treatments? Could it be $$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$?
Or how about the cancer treatment centers, which use high dose melatonin to protect healthy cells, and then use insulin to therapy to starve cancer cells, and then once blood glucose is down use 1/4th the dose of traditional chemotherapy agents to target now starved cancer cells…then they gradually bring up the blood glucose post chemo treatment, and send their patients home. These patients often also change diets to further starve cancer and add adjunct therapies like high dose melatonin and anti-parasitics. They experience far fewer adverse side effects of chemotherapy.
Personally I believe we would all benefit from eating a very low carb diet to always starve cancer cells, as our immune systems are always targeting abnormal cells and cancer cells thrive on carbs! There are many things everyone should do regarding diet and rest and sunshine and, and, and to protect our immune systems, so cancers don’t ever get a foothold.
It is a tragedy that our insurance will refuse payments when patients opt for any alternative to modern oncology treatment, especially considering the alternatives are cheaper and keep people out of hospitals, regardless of outcomes. The whole system is broken!!!
Not so simple with the carbs. Some cancers can use sugar, methionine (from protein), and fatty acids. And not that many people have been very low carb for a while issues are arising.
But no question that there are a ton of treatments that work that most people don't get, which improve the immune system instead of destroying it. Unfortunately chemo is cheap for anyone with insurance, compared to alternative treatments. I spent $200k on alternative treatments. Not many have that kind of money.
What's top alternative that work and what's cheapest of those here for the cheap dying cancer crowd please