Chemotherapy, just like vaccines, is at best a dubious medical “treatment,” with extremely low positive outcomes for patients, all while poisoning both healthy and cancerous cells alike, and greatly shortening lifespans…
People have come forward over the last century with many treatments that should have been tested in double blind true placebo peer reviewed control studies against the surgery, radiation and chemo big pharma treatments.
Why not test Dr. William Makis targeted cancer treatment in such a study? Why does the Canadian government not do that, but instead tries to fine Dr. Makis and put him in jail?
What about Dr. Akbar Khan and his dichloracetate or DCA cancer treatment? Was it welcomed by the powers to be? Speaking of hair loss during chemo, why not do a double blind true placebo peer review control study test of Dr. Khan's SEF chemo treatment so cancer patients DON'T LOSE THEIR HAIR DURING CHEMO?
What about Professor Angus Dalgleish cancer immunotherapy (t-cell boosting) treatment? Was that ever properly tested?
Or Hoxsey cancer treatment?
Or Rene Caisse herbal essaic tea protocol?
Simoncini sodium bicarbonate cancer treatment ever been properly tested?
What about Stanislaw Burzynski cancer treatment?
The Rife machine?
AOH 1996 cancer pill (Dr. Sermed Mezher)?
There is treatments that should be tested, but I don't have time to write it all now. KENNEDY, CAN YOU HEAR ME?
How many others have come forward with better treatment with higher cure rates than cut, burn and poison but only to be taken down by the powers that should not ever have been?
Why do they hire people like Morris Fishbein or Stephen Barret to take down promising cancer treatments rather than study them against big pharma treatments? Could it be $$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$?
Or how about the cancer treatment centers, which use high dose melatonin to protect healthy cells, and then use insulin to therapy to starve cancer cells, and then once blood glucose is down use 1/4th the dose of traditional chemotherapy agents to target now starved cancer cells…then they gradually bring up the blood glucose post chemo treatment, and send their patients home. These patients often also change diets to further starve cancer and add adjunct therapies like high dose melatonin and anti-parasitics. They experience far fewer adverse side effects of chemotherapy.
Personally I believe we would all benefit from eating a very low carb diet to always starve cancer cells, as our immune systems are always targeting abnormal cells and cancer cells thrive on carbs! There are many things everyone should do regarding diet and rest and sunshine and, and, and to protect our immune systems, so cancers don’t ever get a foothold.
It is a tragedy that our insurance will refuse payments when patients opt for any alternative to modern oncology treatment, especially considering the alternatives are cheaper and keep people out of hospitals, regardless of outcomes. The whole system is broken!!!
Not so simple with the carbs. Some cancers can use sugar, methionine (from protein), and fatty acids. And not that many people have been very low carb for a while issues are arising.
But no question that there are a ton of treatments that work that most people don't get, which improve the immune system instead of destroying it. Unfortunately chemo is cheap for anyone with insurance, compared to alternative treatments. I spent $200k on alternative treatments. Not many have that kind of money.
I recall a young woman at a cancer conference stand up and tell the audience that she was treated for lymphoma twice with chemo and after the second treatment regimen, the doctors told her that they could not save her life and she would be dead in three months. She went on to explain that she turned to holistic medicine, change her lifestyle entirely and was now lymphoma free. My cousin was told that he had three months to live because his PSA was out of sight and he asked me to help him get an expensive chemo drug on a compassionate basis because he could not afford it. I did not hear from him for 10 years and he called me and I said to him, I thought you were dead. He said he joined a self-help group and they were taking 10,000 IUs of vitamin D daily and I thought from my medical training that more than 1000 IU’s vitamin D daily which poisonous a lie a lie, a lie!!! another gal was diagnosed with MS and was told that she would soon die and she changed her lifestyle and the MS disappeared. The daughter of a mother who knew about nutrition reversed the MS by nutrient supplements, which I’m sure included vitamin D . when breast cancer cases go from one in 22 after World War II to one and in eight today means that we are not addressing the root causes which includes an epidemic of low vitamin D blood values in the American women. Of course the medicine man will not admit the true role of vitamin D, which is a hormone and not a vitamin and regulates 3000 gene expressions in the human body.. I pray that Robert F Kennedy Junior‘s efforts to fix our healthcare system is not derailed by the money people that benefit from the dysfunctional allopathic medicine model that dominates US health!
the low vitamin D levels also matches when Big Pharma introduced "sunscreen" to protect you against "skin cancer". ...Imagine telling people "here lets block all the vitamin D your body can make naturally with these poisons, that absorb into your skin, that we dont know the long term effects of and have no idea what combining them with soap, flouride, perfumes etc can do"
There is no question in my mind that every adult should have a blood value of 50 ng’s to stay healthy. Lifestyle issues, such as being told that the sun causes cancer so use sunscreens the fact that some prescription drugs, deplete, vitamin D the fact that statin drugs lowers cholesterol levels. That chicken eggs don’t deliver the vitamin D since they raised them in dark barn not in the sunThat’s only partial list.a partial list.
Statins are a 30 billion business for Big Pharma and a illness generator. Thanks for the heads up on this! We have certainly gone down the wrong path in medicine. I don't think I have ever read an article about the negative effects of statins that addressed the Vitamin D aspect!
There is an app called MyCircadian that measures the light (lux) with your phone, uses your location and time of day, and tells you how much vitamin D you can make. Near the equator you can make significantly more than away from it. Of course there are many reasons quantum biology is showing that getting it from the sun is best.
For at least the last 40 years oncologists have been asked in numerous surveys if they would take the chemotherapy that they are all too happy to shove into the veins of those they prey upon and the answer of over 70% of them all down those years has been a resounding No!
Now clearly many of those who said "Yes" have lied because they would think answering "No" may come back to haunt them and cause them problems with their employers so you can bet the real figure is much greater than 80%.
If it isn't a good idea for them it isn't a good idea for you.
Chemo has nothing to do with fixing cancer. It is just another of the thousands in the endless parade of drugs designed with only one purpose...PROFIT. You can tell that by the endless 50 year old war on cancer.
To be followed by another 50 year war on cancer that will not change a thing except make more profits for big pharma and the doctors.
In over 70 years, I have known maybe one of dozens of cancer patients to survive chemo. None of my closest friends or family members (about 7-8) have ever survived. All died between ages 5 and 70.
I would never get chemo. There is a far greater chance you will live longer without it. Besides, there are dozens of less demonic cures to try.
Organ donation is the other nightmare part of this issue bc Doctor’s use brain scan option to say the patient is dead when it’s alive…One has to be alive for a Doctor to utilize the Organs. Part of Depopulation is take viable organs as well. If you live in America don’t put Organ Donor on your Drivers License.
Thanks for this comment. Also, place the fact that you are NOT an "Organ Donor" on other documents, like Health Care Proxy Form and Living Will. An Organization called H.A.L.O. also has a downloadable card you can place in your wallet, which I Link below.
I have heard reports of the corrupt medical establishment "opting you in" to organ donation if it is NOT clear you've OPTED OUT.
I also wrote a fuller reply to this post, if you want to read it.
Thank you for this post. This was especially poignant:
*****"Doctors don’t tell them that because they have, as a profession, been bought by the pharmaceutical industry".****
Yes, and many people are still believing that hospitals and doctors are just "good". These are usually the same people who don't understand how human anatomy works, which you also bring up here, especially when you bring up bone marrow and the immune system.
To break it down even further, bone marrow is where our T and B cells originate before they migrate. T and B cells are both WHITE BLOOD CELLS (aka "lymphocytes") that are key to FIGHTING INFECTION.
So, when chemotherapy targets rapidly dividing cells, it is also targeting WBC's (White Blood Cells), which is why chemo patients are in a dire situation when they get infections (which often happens), because their immune system's cells have been so depleted by the chemo, that they CAN'T FIGHT OFF INFECTIONS.
So, people die from the results of chemo which WEAKEN the body.
And the CHEMO-CANCER INDUSTRY, of course, is a multi-billion-dollar industry.
ALL of the pharmaceutical companies behind the covid shot ARE ALSO BIG PLAYERS IN THE CHEMO GAME. So, that's why there is now an uptick in cancers, particularly "turbo cancers" post-injection. This is NOT a coincidence.
The big money makers in the health care/ insurance game are CANCER and GENDER "AFFIRMING" CARE. You will see a trend in doctors and the medical establishment showing less regard and care for patients that cannot be funneled into either of those 2 big money makers, especially if that patient doesn't have high-yield health insurance.
Anyone like-minded can reach me at my email address below. I personally answer all my emails and have left my career in so-called "health care":
Thank you for this detailed information It totally makes sense I heard there was only a few Cancers that could benefit from Chemo …in your opinion is that so ????
I know of one person who looked well and fit , became very Il with cancer after the jabs. She barely made a year before dying. No connection would have been made to the jabs. I know another who got a bad dvt in her leg after 4 of these shots. Sure no connection would have been made and I being a non vaxxer could not suggest it. I know of one close relative died after a return of cancer after the jabs who didn’t survive chemo after months. I know of one or two friends who’s lives have been made miserable after chemo treatments but who so far have survived It’s a cash cow and I stopped supporting cancer charities long ago.
I know two people whose doctors have told them they will be weekly chemo for the rest of their lives. I am not a medical professional in any capacity, and that sounds suspect to me at best. I wonder where big pharma is in all this.
I'm doing a study of chemo and alternatives..please help by asking friends weekly dosage and name of chemo drug..sounds off to me ie victims of experimental Dr on bad side
As a recently former cancer patient, I can confirm there is NO informed consent. I did my own research and declined 5 chemos that were standard of care but the literature showed were useless. I was in touch with hundreds of other women with the same cancer, who were basically told either "You will die without chemo" (totally not true according to the literature), or "Chemo is your best chance at survival", without being told the benefit was minuscule and that death from the chemo was a possibility. A super common one I saw was relative vs absolute risk. If your risk of death was 10% without and 5% with chemo, they tell people they are a 50% reduced risk of death, and virtually everyone told this thought it meant a 50% absolute risk. They never get told the absolute risks, and honestly I don't think most of the oncologists understand them. As it's been said, it's hard to get somebody to understand something when their livelihood depends on not understanding it.
I have cognitive dissonance about my personal oncologist who was very supportive of my declining chemo due to my medical history. He often said he believed in the alternative treatments I was doing but couldn't prescribe them or he'd be fired. A very kind person, and well informed, agreed all my interpretations of studies were correct. How do I reconcile that kindness with the fact that he gives chemo to most of his patients who have not done their own research? I kind of feel like oncologists are chronically depressed because they're not allowed to actually help most people.
Hey Sue ,Greg here,check out my comment on low dose chemo ,using insulin to starve the tumor of sugar,then mixing sugar with chemo drug to cause targeting of tumor and mistletoe to counter side effects of chemo...From my research it appears this is the correct , optimum dose ie 80 percent less chemo per dose plus 4 x more regular doses (to kill all parasitics really responsible requiring more constant but lower targeted dosing they mostly deny).Only clinics offering,insurance won't cover.
I'm going to do an article on chemo and cancer scams but with solutions.
Please consider assist by pinpointing those 5% gain not 50 percent gain thing ,and how it's laid out as it seems it would have to be by conspiracy as math is is simple and it would have to be delivered in exact times sequences, phrases to sell well, especially where they translate it later into even more defined math from that earlier figure of ultimate fifty to 80 percent gains we see..almost a mind control sequencing program in statistics to confuse both Drs and patients (potentially hypnotic layering of some sort us included there's no question most Drs seem under a protocol spell, program of some sort to keep on pushing bad drugs across board ie mass murder by zombie Drs effect seems we have here,yikes!
Motivation for information sharing on better cancer therapy:Since most people don't know of ISP low dose chemo or mistletoe or other better alternative for themselves and people it can be rewarding sharing that info for oneself and for those others to fill with light and goodness the dark grey to black void predominating there now...ie blessed stuff creation, distribution to counter factors of suffering and death.. worthy stuff to "get at" as they comparatively go!
Low dose chemo with ISP ie insulin therapy and mistletoe therapy today reduce chemo side effects is the secret of the elites and Hollywood and health and cancer clinics scattered across USA and world.
Basically your total therapy time is doubled but the the total chemo over months is reduced twenty percent and instead of once every 2 weeks it twice a week 80 percent reduced dose.Since cancer lives on sugar , glucose, insulin shots starve the tumour and then glucose is added to chemo and tumor sucks it up
Mistletoe toe heals cancer on it's own but counters chemo side effects too drastically in studies .
No hair loss for 90 or percent or serious side effects..unlike regular chemo at 90 percent mid level to serious side effects
Results in tests avg 50 percent better results at 1-3- 5;year mark to 500 % +better results some clinics claimed.
Insurance won't cover usually, expensive..
Some Drs do offer to 50 percent of regular dose if you claim chemical allergies or like but insurance companies generally will only cover to 20 percent reduction in dose initially and then down to approx 50 percent if still having issues.
Generally not allowed to offer 80 percent lower 2 a week shots...However rumours of radiologists skirting the rules and offering it but off the books as well as ablation surgery,a 5-20 minute surgery where a rod with a hot or below zero old burns off tumor with less side effects.
Check out Bollinger cancer site.for alternative alternatives
Thank you for continuing to write the truth and provide treatment options where we can point people. I tried to do that with a neighbor who had throat cancer and he was so sure his doctor was doing what he needed. Unfortunately that is the mindset of so many. He died of course mid-treatment. In mid-2022 a tumor formed in my upper arm and turned out to be cancerous. I said then that I would never do chemotherapy. One of my arrogant neighbors said, "That's what a lot of people say and then they do it." I lashed back that I'm not other people. Fortunately, it turned out that was never going to be an option for this particular type of cancer so I never had to have that fight with my oncologist.
During Covid my mother in law was undergoing chemo for endometrial cancer. Then those jabs warped sped and her primary care dr told her it was a good idea to jab while doing chemo. She suffered neuropathy and her doctor later died from brain cancer. Oh and the chemo didn’t work. She got better results from Keytruda but she still has debilitating neuropathy.
People have come forward over the last century with many treatments that should have been tested in double blind true placebo peer reviewed control studies against the surgery, radiation and chemo big pharma treatments.
Why not test Dr. William Makis targeted cancer treatment in such a study? Why does the Canadian government not do that, but instead tries to fine Dr. Makis and put him in jail?
What about Dr. Akbar Khan and his dichloracetate or DCA cancer treatment? Was it welcomed by the powers to be? Speaking of hair loss during chemo, why not do a double blind true placebo peer review control study test of Dr. Khan's SEF chemo treatment so cancer patients DON'T LOSE THEIR HAIR DURING CHEMO?
What about Professor Angus Dalgleish cancer immunotherapy (t-cell boosting) treatment? Was that ever properly tested?
Or Hoxsey cancer treatment?
Or Rene Caisse herbal essaic tea protocol?
Simoncini sodium bicarbonate cancer treatment ever been properly tested?
What about Stanislaw Burzynski cancer treatment?
The Rife machine?
AOH 1996 cancer pill (Dr. Sermed Mezher)?
There is treatments that should be tested, but I don't have time to write it all now. KENNEDY, CAN YOU HEAR ME?
How many others have come forward with better treatment with higher cure rates than cut, burn and poison but only to be taken down by the powers that should not ever have been?
Why do they hire people like Morris Fishbein or Stephen Barret to take down promising cancer treatments rather than study them against big pharma treatments? Could it be $$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$?
Or how about the cancer treatment centers, which use high dose melatonin to protect healthy cells, and then use insulin to therapy to starve cancer cells, and then once blood glucose is down use 1/4th the dose of traditional chemotherapy agents to target now starved cancer cells…then they gradually bring up the blood glucose post chemo treatment, and send their patients home. These patients often also change diets to further starve cancer and add adjunct therapies like high dose melatonin and anti-parasitics. They experience far fewer adverse side effects of chemotherapy.
Personally I believe we would all benefit from eating a very low carb diet to always starve cancer cells, as our immune systems are always targeting abnormal cells and cancer cells thrive on carbs! There are many things everyone should do regarding diet and rest and sunshine and, and, and to protect our immune systems, so cancers don’t ever get a foothold.
It is a tragedy that our insurance will refuse payments when patients opt for any alternative to modern oncology treatment, especially considering the alternatives are cheaper and keep people out of hospitals, regardless of outcomes. The whole system is broken!!!
Not so simple with the carbs. Some cancers can use sugar, methionine (from protein), and fatty acids. And not that many people have been very low carb for a while issues are arising.
But no question that there are a ton of treatments that work that most people don't get, which improve the immune system instead of destroying it. Unfortunately chemo is cheap for anyone with insurance, compared to alternative treatments. I spent $200k on alternative treatments. Not many have that kind of money.
What's top alternative that work and what's cheapest of those here for the cheap dying cancer crowd please
I recall a young woman at a cancer conference stand up and tell the audience that she was treated for lymphoma twice with chemo and after the second treatment regimen, the doctors told her that they could not save her life and she would be dead in three months. She went on to explain that she turned to holistic medicine, change her lifestyle entirely and was now lymphoma free. My cousin was told that he had three months to live because his PSA was out of sight and he asked me to help him get an expensive chemo drug on a compassionate basis because he could not afford it. I did not hear from him for 10 years and he called me and I said to him, I thought you were dead. He said he joined a self-help group and they were taking 10,000 IUs of vitamin D daily and I thought from my medical training that more than 1000 IU’s vitamin D daily which poisonous a lie a lie, a lie!!! another gal was diagnosed with MS and was told that she would soon die and she changed her lifestyle and the MS disappeared. The daughter of a mother who knew about nutrition reversed the MS by nutrient supplements, which I’m sure included vitamin D . when breast cancer cases go from one in 22 after World War II to one and in eight today means that we are not addressing the root causes which includes an epidemic of low vitamin D blood values in the American women. Of course the medicine man will not admit the true role of vitamin D, which is a hormone and not a vitamin and regulates 3000 gene expressions in the human body.. I pray that Robert F Kennedy Junior‘s efforts to fix our healthcare system is not derailed by the money people that benefit from the dysfunctional allopathic medicine model that dominates US health!
the low vitamin D levels also matches when Big Pharma introduced "sunscreen" to protect you against "skin cancer". ...Imagine telling people "here lets block all the vitamin D your body can make naturally with these poisons, that absorb into your skin, that we dont know the long term effects of and have no idea what combining them with soap, flouride, perfumes etc can do"
There is no question in my mind that every adult should have a blood value of 50 ng’s to stay healthy. Lifestyle issues, such as being told that the sun causes cancer so use sunscreens the fact that some prescription drugs, deplete, vitamin D the fact that statin drugs lowers cholesterol levels. That chicken eggs don’t deliver the vitamin D since they raised them in dark barn not in the sunThat’s only partial list.a partial list.
Statins lower cholesterol which keeps vitamin D low.
Statins are a 30 billion business for Big Pharma and a illness generator. Thanks for the heads up on this! We have certainly gone down the wrong path in medicine. I don't think I have ever read an article about the negative effects of statins that addressed the Vitamin D aspect!
I am not in the medical field but I don't think statins are really good for you.
Also I would be interested in how much sun light it is equivalent to 10,000 of vitamin D?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VVuCIWL0utM
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dsA70OYtvYw
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8k40AeKK5Lk
There is an app called MyCircadian that measures the light (lux) with your phone, uses your location and time of day, and tells you how much vitamin D you can make. Near the equator you can make significantly more than away from it. Of course there are many reasons quantum biology is showing that getting it from the sun is best.
For at least the last 40 years oncologists have been asked in numerous surveys if they would take the chemotherapy that they are all too happy to shove into the veins of those they prey upon and the answer of over 70% of them all down those years has been a resounding No!
Now clearly many of those who said "Yes" have lied because they would think answering "No" may come back to haunt them and cause them problems with their employers so you can bet the real figure is much greater than 80%.
If it isn't a good idea for them it isn't a good idea for you.
My father was a hospital administrator for thirty five years.
When his own father got cancer he refused chemotherapy. When he himself got cancer he refused chemotherapy.
My personal experience and who said NO seems to validate your comment.
My father even told me. I want you to know I am not giving up I just want to live a little longer. With further study, now I know why !!!
Chemo has nothing to do with fixing cancer. It is just another of the thousands in the endless parade of drugs designed with only one purpose...PROFIT. You can tell that by the endless 50 year old war on cancer.
To be followed by another 50 year war on cancer that will not change a thing except make more profits for big pharma and the doctors.
In over 70 years, I have known maybe one of dozens of cancer patients to survive chemo. None of my closest friends or family members (about 7-8) have ever survived. All died between ages 5 and 70.
I would never get chemo. There is a far greater chance you will live longer without it. Besides, there are dozens of less demonic cures to try.
Have found oncologists to become entirely defensive regarding the subject of chemotherapy.
Organ donation is the other nightmare part of this issue bc Doctor’s use brain scan option to say the patient is dead when it’s alive…One has to be alive for a Doctor to utilize the Organs. Part of Depopulation is take viable organs as well. If you live in America don’t put Organ Donor on your Drivers License.
The average person can't comprehend the danger of doing so.
Thanks for this comment. Also, place the fact that you are NOT an "Organ Donor" on other documents, like Health Care Proxy Form and Living Will. An Organization called H.A.L.O. also has a downloadable card you can place in your wallet, which I Link below.
I have heard reports of the corrupt medical establishment "opting you in" to organ donation if it is NOT clear you've OPTED OUT.
I also wrote a fuller reply to this post, if you want to read it.
LINKED below:
https://halovoice.org/wp-content/uploads/donor_refusal_card.pdf
Thank you for this post. This was especially poignant:
*****"Doctors don’t tell them that because they have, as a profession, been bought by the pharmaceutical industry".****
Yes, and many people are still believing that hospitals and doctors are just "good". These are usually the same people who don't understand how human anatomy works, which you also bring up here, especially when you bring up bone marrow and the immune system.
To break it down even further, bone marrow is where our T and B cells originate before they migrate. T and B cells are both WHITE BLOOD CELLS (aka "lymphocytes") that are key to FIGHTING INFECTION.
So, when chemotherapy targets rapidly dividing cells, it is also targeting WBC's (White Blood Cells), which is why chemo patients are in a dire situation when they get infections (which often happens), because their immune system's cells have been so depleted by the chemo, that they CAN'T FIGHT OFF INFECTIONS.
So, people die from the results of chemo which WEAKEN the body.
And the CHEMO-CANCER INDUSTRY, of course, is a multi-billion-dollar industry.
ALL of the pharmaceutical companies behind the covid shot ARE ALSO BIG PLAYERS IN THE CHEMO GAME. So, that's why there is now an uptick in cancers, particularly "turbo cancers" post-injection. This is NOT a coincidence.
The big money makers in the health care/ insurance game are CANCER and GENDER "AFFIRMING" CARE. You will see a trend in doctors and the medical establishment showing less regard and care for patients that cannot be funneled into either of those 2 big money makers, especially if that patient doesn't have high-yield health insurance.
Anyone like-minded can reach me at my email address below. I personally answer all my emails and have left my career in so-called "health care":
JoannaVitalHealth@protonmail.com
Thank you for this detailed information It totally makes sense I heard there was only a few Cancers that could benefit from Chemo …in your opinion is that so ????
All I needed to know about chemotherapy drugs was the warning that personnel should DOUBLE-GLOVE when handling them.
And you want patients to inject that?
I know of one person who looked well and fit , became very Il with cancer after the jabs. She barely made a year before dying. No connection would have been made to the jabs. I know another who got a bad dvt in her leg after 4 of these shots. Sure no connection would have been made and I being a non vaxxer could not suggest it. I know of one close relative died after a return of cancer after the jabs who didn’t survive chemo after months. I know of one or two friends who’s lives have been made miserable after chemo treatments but who so far have survived It’s a cash cow and I stopped supporting cancer charities long ago.
You’re worth your weight in gold. And more.
I know two people whose doctors have told them they will be weekly chemo for the rest of their lives. I am not a medical professional in any capacity, and that sounds suspect to me at best. I wonder where big pharma is in all this.
I'm doing a study of chemo and alternatives..please help by asking friends weekly dosage and name of chemo drug..sounds off to me ie victims of experimental Dr on bad side
As a recently former cancer patient, I can confirm there is NO informed consent. I did my own research and declined 5 chemos that were standard of care but the literature showed were useless. I was in touch with hundreds of other women with the same cancer, who were basically told either "You will die without chemo" (totally not true according to the literature), or "Chemo is your best chance at survival", without being told the benefit was minuscule and that death from the chemo was a possibility. A super common one I saw was relative vs absolute risk. If your risk of death was 10% without and 5% with chemo, they tell people they are a 50% reduced risk of death, and virtually everyone told this thought it meant a 50% absolute risk. They never get told the absolute risks, and honestly I don't think most of the oncologists understand them. As it's been said, it's hard to get somebody to understand something when their livelihood depends on not understanding it.
I have cognitive dissonance about my personal oncologist who was very supportive of my declining chemo due to my medical history. He often said he believed in the alternative treatments I was doing but couldn't prescribe them or he'd be fired. A very kind person, and well informed, agreed all my interpretations of studies were correct. How do I reconcile that kindness with the fact that he gives chemo to most of his patients who have not done their own research? I kind of feel like oncologists are chronically depressed because they're not allowed to actually help most people.
Hey Sue ,Greg here,check out my comment on low dose chemo ,using insulin to starve the tumor of sugar,then mixing sugar with chemo drug to cause targeting of tumor and mistletoe to counter side effects of chemo...From my research it appears this is the correct , optimum dose ie 80 percent less chemo per dose plus 4 x more regular doses (to kill all parasitics really responsible requiring more constant but lower targeted dosing they mostly deny).Only clinics offering,insurance won't cover.
I'm going to do an article on chemo and cancer scams but with solutions.
Please consider assist by pinpointing those 5% gain not 50 percent gain thing ,and how it's laid out as it seems it would have to be by conspiracy as math is is simple and it would have to be delivered in exact times sequences, phrases to sell well, especially where they translate it later into even more defined math from that earlier figure of ultimate fifty to 80 percent gains we see..almost a mind control sequencing program in statistics to confuse both Drs and patients (potentially hypnotic layering of some sort us included there's no question most Drs seem under a protocol spell, program of some sort to keep on pushing bad drugs across board ie mass murder by zombie Drs effect seems we have here,yikes!
I'm well aware of IPT. What is the point of this comment though? I honestly don't understand what you're getting at. I don't even have cancer anymore.
Motivation for information sharing on better cancer therapy:Since most people don't know of ISP low dose chemo or mistletoe or other better alternative for themselves and people it can be rewarding sharing that info for oneself and for those others to fill with light and goodness the dark grey to black void predominating there now...ie blessed stuff creation, distribution to counter factors of suffering and death.. worthy stuff to "get at" as they comparatively go!
Low dose chemo with ISP ie insulin therapy and mistletoe therapy today reduce chemo side effects is the secret of the elites and Hollywood and health and cancer clinics scattered across USA and world.
Basically your total therapy time is doubled but the the total chemo over months is reduced twenty percent and instead of once every 2 weeks it twice a week 80 percent reduced dose.Since cancer lives on sugar , glucose, insulin shots starve the tumour and then glucose is added to chemo and tumor sucks it up
Mistletoe toe heals cancer on it's own but counters chemo side effects too drastically in studies .
No hair loss for 90 or percent or serious side effects..unlike regular chemo at 90 percent mid level to serious side effects
Results in tests avg 50 percent better results at 1-3- 5;year mark to 500 % +better results some clinics claimed.
Insurance won't cover usually, expensive..
Some Drs do offer to 50 percent of regular dose if you claim chemical allergies or like but insurance companies generally will only cover to 20 percent reduction in dose initially and then down to approx 50 percent if still having issues.
Generally not allowed to offer 80 percent lower 2 a week shots...However rumours of radiologists skirting the rules and offering it but off the books as well as ablation surgery,a 5-20 minute surgery where a rod with a hot or below zero old burns off tumor with less side effects.
Check out Bollinger cancer site.for alternative alternatives
Thank you for continuing to write the truth and provide treatment options where we can point people. I tried to do that with a neighbor who had throat cancer and he was so sure his doctor was doing what he needed. Unfortunately that is the mindset of so many. He died of course mid-treatment. In mid-2022 a tumor formed in my upper arm and turned out to be cancerous. I said then that I would never do chemotherapy. One of my arrogant neighbors said, "That's what a lot of people say and then they do it." I lashed back that I'm not other people. Fortunately, it turned out that was never going to be an option for this particular type of cancer so I never had to have that fight with my oncologist.
During Covid my mother in law was undergoing chemo for endometrial cancer. Then those jabs warped sped and her primary care dr told her it was a good idea to jab while doing chemo. She suffered neuropathy and her doctor later died from brain cancer. Oh and the chemo didn’t work. She got better results from Keytruda but she still has debilitating neuropathy.
Keytruda harms many people as well. One of my oncologist's patients got a new autoimmune disease with each dose.