Steve Kirsch BOMBSHELL: We have won. The COVID vaccine killed hundreds of thousands of Americans and now we can prove it to anyone who will listen

Thank you to the 547 readers who filled out my survey. The results prove they lied to us about the COVID vaccine. It is a disaster. We now have an objective way to prove they lied to us.

by Steve Kirsch

This is the number of deaths per 28 day period for Doses 2 and above. The bars should be equal height for the first 6 months. They aren't. That's a serious problem for the narrative. This implies an annual all-cause mortality increase of over 15%. That is a trainwreck.

Executive summary

I couldn’t have done this without your help.

We have won. The finger pointing will now begin. Everyone is going to blame this on the other guy and not accept any responsibility. The CDC will blame the FDA. The FDA will blame the drug companies. The drug companies will blame the people running the trials. The doctors will blame the CDC. Congress will blame the CDC. The White House will blame the FDA and former President Trump. And Trump will blame everyone who worked for him.

I now have a fully objective method that proves that the COVID vaccines killed hundreds of thousands of innocent Americans who trusted the healthcare authorities and mainstream media and took the shot.

The method can be used by any health authority, anywhere in the world, to prove, without any doubt, that the COVID vaccines are killing people in massive numbers. The attempts to gaslight, censor, and defame me are over.

The health authorities can execute this method and have results in less than 24 hours. But none of them want to do that. Because they know what will happen.

I just posted the latest results to X:

The survey: was it biased? Not in any way that would impact the outcome.

Here’s the Substack article that gave me the data all the data I needed.

The most important poll of my life

Nobody knew the purpose of the survey, how it would be measured, etc.

I even did a tweet about it to see if anyone could figure it out. Only one person got close. Everyone else was clueless.

And even if they figured it out, you can’t game the survey because nobody could see the results to know where to vote.

The reality is I normally get over 10,000 responses to polls like this, but on this one I just got over 500 response, even after begging people. This suggests than around 90% weren’t able to report any deaths. So those who reported deaths had only ONE death to choose from. They were instructed, if there was >1 death, to report the death whose details they knew the best. That’s it.

Here’s a comment from the comments section below:

Steve, I am like many commenting here. I have a nephew who I believe was killed by the “vaccine”. My problem is I don’t know exactly how many shots he had or the date of his last shot so I don’t feel I can participate in your poll. My guess is that he was fully vaxxed. He was a fire department Captain at a major airport. The physical demands of his job made proper diet and fitness mandatory. He was in EXCELLENT shape. In late July of this year he was diagnosed with stage 4 cancer to three major organs, including a large tumour on his pancreas, and blood clots throughout his body. He was gone in one month. He was only 44. So tragic and unnecessary.

Here’s another comment saying the same thing. People couldn’t fill out the survey unless they knew details and few people knew details on even one death!

The other way it could be biased if all my readers became a reader after a sudden death happened in their family after getting a COVID vaccine.

But as you can see that this isn’t the case at all:

Airtable survey of my readers for how they became first aware that vaccines were bad. Only a small percentage did so due to a death after the COVID vaccine.

So any bias is very minimal because each responder basically had no choice to pick the person who died suddenly.

And if there was any bias, the bars would drop exponentially over time. You don’t see that. The shape doesn’t fit the hypothesis.

All surveys have bias, but there is no evidence whatsoever that these results are explainable by “bias.”

Nor can the results be explained by the “healthy vaccinee effect (HVE).” HVE reduces death in the early weeks after a vaccine because people who are about to die don’t get vaccinated. So deaths in the first month are always lower than average. The fact that the opposite occurred is devastating.

How credible is this result?

Yale Professor Harvey Risch, one of the top epidemiologists in the world, invited me on his podcast tonight to discuss the results. He’s already seen the survey and the results. You’ll be able to watch the episode after it is posted here.

Yale Professor Harvey Risch will be interviewing me tonight in a pre-record for his podcast.

Do you think he would be doing that if it wasn’t credible? Of course not.

Why has nobody seen this before?

Because the data is kept hidden.

No mainstream pro-vaccine doctor has ever called for data transparency of public health data.

And every health authority in the world hides the record level health data from the public.

Once you link death records and vaccine records it’s all over. That’s why they never do it.

States like California keep the records separately: so nobody will find out. You can’t even FOIA the records because they aren’t linked. They are not required to link the records for you.

The CDC refuses to request vaccination records from the states because the CDC doesn’t want to know. If they did and linked them, we could FOIA them.

I couldn’t even get my local lawmaker, Senator Josh Becker, to champion a data transparency bill to expose the public health data in a HIPAA compliant way. He listened to my rationale and said it was something he didn’t want to pursue. At all.

The California state epidemiologist, Erica Pan, abruptly stopped talking to me after I asked “Do you believe in data transparency of public health data?” I offered to show her the record level data I collected. No response.

I couldn’t get the UK ONS to publish their record level data. They said it would be a violation of the law.

I couldn’t get any government authority to provide the data under FOIA. They said it would be expensive. When I offered to pay, they stopped talking to me.

So lacking official data, I had no choice but to collect it myself. So that’s what I did.

And the results are devastating. Really devastating.

Today, I spend about 3X as many dollars as I receive from Substack subscriptions. This is not sustainable for me. It’s only $5/mo or $50/yr.

I’d like to have the funds to make my work more visible outside of my subscriber base.

Summary

They lied about “safe and effective.”

I can now prove it wasn’t safe, that it did NOT reduce risk of infection or hospitalization, and it increased the risk of death from COVID.

60 Minutes and the rest of the mainstream media should be allowing America to hear the evidence on both sides and decide for themselves. But unbiased news is dead in America. But maybe Tucker Carlson will talk to me.

In the meantime, we now have the tools to prove we were right. But it seems nobody in power wants to use the tools. That tells you everything you need to know, doesn’t it?

Please share this post and also repost my post on X. Thanks.

---

Do NOT comply.