Excuse me but doesn't this updated Joe Tippens protocol with the addition of VIR-X (which also has 62.5mg VitD as cholecalciferol) DOUBLE the original protocol's VitD recommendation of 62.5mg VitD? Not that there's a problem with that especially if the goal is to keep the VITAMIN D 25 HYDROXY above the 50ng/mL level in the blood. Just wo…
Excuse me but doesn't this updated Joe Tippens protocol with the addition of VIR-X (which also has 62.5mg VitD as cholecalciferol) DOUBLE the original protocol's VitD recommendation of 62.5mg VitD? Not that there's a problem with that especially if the goal is to keep the VITAMIN D 25 HYDROXY above the 50ng/mL level in the blood. Just wondering about this VIR-X addition to the original protocol. Lots of stuff (good stuff) in that VIR-X product. 62.5mg VitD stuck out in my mind.
Yes, we need the established medical establishment (sorry for the redundancy) to take Fenben and Iver seriously, and perhaps consider parasites (which both attack) as a possible cause of cancer. This instead of trying novel ways of selectively poisoning cancer cells without understanding why they are there.
Excuse me but doesn't this updated Joe Tippens protocol with the addition of VIR-X (which also has 62.5mg VitD as cholecalciferol) DOUBLE the original protocol's VitD recommendation of 62.5mg VitD? Not that there's a problem with that especially if the goal is to keep the VITAMIN D 25 HYDROXY above the 50ng/mL level in the blood. Just wondering about this VIR-X addition to the original protocol. Lots of stuff (good stuff) in that VIR-X product. 62.5mg VitD stuck out in my mind.
Yes, we need the established medical establishment (sorry for the redundancy) to take Fenben and Iver seriously, and perhaps consider parasites (which both attack) as a possible cause of cancer. This instead of trying novel ways of selectively poisoning cancer cells without understanding why they are there.