I was watching with the audience Trump needed to win over. Undecided, low information, voters. Trump struck out with this essential cohort. The Harris/ABC team lied and cheated through the entire debate. Trump came off as defensive and aggressive. His explanations to expose the lies, were accurate but, did not debunk the lies. Low info voters don’t know enough to detect the lies or understand Trump’s explanation. To win this cohort, Trump just needed to ask “ Are you better off now or when I was President?” Then give examples: Inflation, Economy, Jobs, Crime, Wars, Antisemitism, etc.
As Aldous Huxley observed in Brave New World Revisited: “Non-stop distractions of the most fascinating nature are deliberately used as instruments of policy, for the purpose of preventing people from paying too much attention to the realities of the social and political situation… Only the vigilant can maintain their liberties, and only those who are constantly and intellectually ‘on-point’ can hope to govern themselves effectively by democratic procedures.” AND:
As Murray N. Rothbard stated in Anatomy of the State: “The greatest danger to the State is independent intellectual criticism; there is no better way to stifle that criticism than to attack any isolated voice, any raiser of new doubts, as a profane violator of the wisdom of his ancestors. Another potent ideological force is to deprecate the individual and exalt the collectivity of society. For since any given rule implies majority acceptance, any ideological danger to that rule can only start from one or a few independently thinking individuals. The new idea, much less the new critical idea, must begin as a small minority opinion; therefore, the State must nip the view in the bud by ridiculing any view that defies the opinions of the mass. “Listen only to your brothers” or “adjust to society” thus become ideological weapons for crushing individual dissent. By such measures, the masses will never learn of the nonexistence of the Emperor’s clothes.” AND:
“When you see that in order to produce, you need to obtain permission from men who produce nothing—when you see that money is flowing to those who deal, not in goods, but in favors—when you see that men get richer by graft and by pull than by work, and your laws don’t protect you against them, but protect them against you—when you see corruption being rewarded and honesty becoming a self-sacrifice—you may know that your society is doomed.” Ayn Rand; Atlas Shrugged, 1957
ABC interviewed Vance after the debate, and he tore Jonathan Karl a new ass. But Krispie Kreme sour grapes Christy was up next and (reverse) harpooned The Don unmercifully to the delight of the panel. His lies were worse than Karmela’s.
PS according to a poll taken shortly after the debate, Trump won by 92%, while Harris got 4% and 4% believed there was no clear winner.
Thanks this was the best synopsis I’ve read yet this morning.
I was watching with the audience Trump needed to win over. Undecided, low information, voters. Trump struck out with this essential cohort. The Harris/ABC team lied and cheated through the entire debate. Trump came off as defensive and aggressive. His explanations to expose the lies, were accurate but, did not debunk the lies. Low info voters don’t know enough to detect the lies or understand Trump’s explanation. To win this cohort, Trump just needed to ask “ Are you better off now or when I was President?” Then give examples: Inflation, Economy, Jobs, Crime, Wars, Antisemitism, etc.
The lying, sleazy globalist UK press are saying "A senior Republican told me Trump's performance was the 'worst debate' he'd ever seen."
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-13836775/Trump-harris-worst-debate-ANDREW-NEIL.html
And I'm sure a poll straight out of Kamala's ass says she won by 92%
Abc and all the other sycophants thought she did great.
As Aldous Huxley observed in Brave New World Revisited: “Non-stop distractions of the most fascinating nature are deliberately used as instruments of policy, for the purpose of preventing people from paying too much attention to the realities of the social and political situation… Only the vigilant can maintain their liberties, and only those who are constantly and intellectually ‘on-point’ can hope to govern themselves effectively by democratic procedures.” AND:
As Murray N. Rothbard stated in Anatomy of the State: “The greatest danger to the State is independent intellectual criticism; there is no better way to stifle that criticism than to attack any isolated voice, any raiser of new doubts, as a profane violator of the wisdom of his ancestors. Another potent ideological force is to deprecate the individual and exalt the collectivity of society. For since any given rule implies majority acceptance, any ideological danger to that rule can only start from one or a few independently thinking individuals. The new idea, much less the new critical idea, must begin as a small minority opinion; therefore, the State must nip the view in the bud by ridiculing any view that defies the opinions of the mass. “Listen only to your brothers” or “adjust to society” thus become ideological weapons for crushing individual dissent. By such measures, the masses will never learn of the nonexistence of the Emperor’s clothes.” AND:
“When you see that in order to produce, you need to obtain permission from men who produce nothing—when you see that money is flowing to those who deal, not in goods, but in favors—when you see that men get richer by graft and by pull than by work, and your laws don’t protect you against them, but protect them against you—when you see corruption being rewarded and honesty becoming a self-sacrifice—you may know that your society is doomed.” Ayn Rand; Atlas Shrugged, 1957
ABC interviewed Vance after the debate, and he tore Jonathan Karl a new ass. But Krispie Kreme sour grapes Christy was up next and (reverse) harpooned The Don unmercifully to the delight of the panel. His lies were worse than Karmela’s.