What to say??? I can only comment on my view of "Hindsight" from many sElections in the past. In this video of 2012 with Romney vs Obama, How I sooo wanted Romney to "Win" at the time. Now "knowing" him to be such a Putz and the Charade of it all. Going back to 2008 as well. Yet as I get closer to present time I do not have ambivalent feelings about Trump winning over Clinton, or the Deep State Steal in 2020 installing a Coup Regime.
Perhaps as much as 80% of all governments are unnecessary, but 100% of anything is not only a negative, it is Impossible to achieve. The Founders never claimed to have a perfect government in the Constitution, only a "workable" Republic "If We Could Keep It". We didn't.
Want to "Try Again" to reestablish a Constitutional Republic or just hang it up? The Bolshevik democRats and NWO ProgreSSives sure aren't Shy about their Plans, Intentions, and Accomplishments.
It’s my moral obligation to obey every law the great AOC and her wonderful colleagues write. They are superior or else they would not have been elected. Shame on anyone who says even one bad word against our great religious and government leaders. I am happy to surrender to them my guns, my food, and my children.
Very powerful & to the point. I have felt betrayed by our government & I am shocked my the truth with regards to the Pope as well as being dismayed that Queen Elizabeth II and even more so some of her heirs are implicated within the corrupted ruling of our supposedly "Democratic" society!!! Unfortunately those who need to listen to this just won't.
The issue here is try explaining to the judge the following:
Whereas: “State” is a Federal term exclusively; and
Whereas: For purposes of tax under Title 26 U.S.C., “State” is defined in a political sense and
means the body politic of the District of Columbia and no other thing (supra, paragraph 39); and
Whereas: None of the 50 commonwealths united by and under authority of the Constitution and
admitted into the Union is a State, as Congress define “State” in Title 26 U.S.C.; and
Whereas: There is no definition of “state” in any statute of the 50 aforesaid commonwealths that
comprehends any such commonwealth as a state; and
Whereas: Any and all official, governmental use of “State” means the body politic of the District
of Columbia (and no other thing); and
Whereas: The government of every commonwealth united by and under authority of the
Constitution and admitted into the Union uses the Federal term “State” in its official title, i.e., State
of Alabama, State of Alaska, State of Arizona, State of Arkansas, State of California, State of
Colorado, State of Connecticut, State of Delaware, State of Florida, State of Georgia, State of
Hawaii, State of Idaho, State of Illinois, State of Indiana, State of Iowa, State of Kansas, State of
Kentucky, State of Louisiana, State of Maine, State of Maryland, State of Massachusetts, State of
Michigan, State of Minnesota, State of Mississippi, State of Missouri, State of Montana, State of
Nebraska, State of Nevada, State of New Hampshire, State of New Jersey, State of New Mexico,
State of New York, State of North Carolina, State of North Dakota, State of Ohio, State of
Oklahoma, State of Oregon, State of Pennsylvania, State of Rhode Island, State of South
Carolina, State of South Dakota, State of Tennessee, State of Texas, State of Utah, State of
Vermont, State of Virginia, State of Washington, State of West Virginia, State of Wisconsin, and
State of Wyoming; and
Whereas: Any government use of “State” means the body politic of the District of Columbia; e.g.,
“State of Alabama” means the body politic of the District of Columbia of Alabama,
I will review your bonus links later. Basically taxes are a sleight of hand under color of law, and there is no possible legal means of imposing direct and un-apportioned taxation in an state outside the Sate of District of Columbia which is not one of the states of the union by design.
Larken Rose is a treasure and he is truthful in his assessment.
Unless there is a major cosmic shift? Things will implode in the US
because the main of the population has sold out and will comply .
The soul of the former "free person" has been diminished by the person.
The Ostrich crowd wants to get back to "normal", and will help to postpone
destiny for just one more day of near "normal".
Get out of the system now, immediately, or expect to be washed away in the
Tsunami of hell on earth. Overly dramatic? I know I am only 1/2 way out of
the system, but I am trying. BTW, move toward this step-wise. Reversals do take time,
everyone, please just do your best.
What to say??? I can only comment on my view of "Hindsight" from many sElections in the past. In this video of 2012 with Romney vs Obama, How I sooo wanted Romney to "Win" at the time. Now "knowing" him to be such a Putz and the Charade of it all. Going back to 2008 as well. Yet as I get closer to present time I do not have ambivalent feelings about Trump winning over Clinton, or the Deep State Steal in 2020 installing a Coup Regime.
Perhaps as much as 80% of all governments are unnecessary, but 100% of anything is not only a negative, it is Impossible to achieve. The Founders never claimed to have a perfect government in the Constitution, only a "workable" Republic "If We Could Keep It". We didn't.
Want to "Try Again" to reestablish a Constitutional Republic or just hang it up? The Bolshevik democRats and NWO ProgreSSives sure aren't Shy about their Plans, Intentions, and Accomplishments.
It’s my moral obligation to obey every law the great AOC and her wonderful colleagues write. They are superior or else they would not have been elected. Shame on anyone who says even one bad word against our great religious and government leaders. I am happy to surrender to them my guns, my food, and my children.
Always loved that one of Larken's. May want to change link to start at 20s, or remove the seconds at all.
Very powerful & to the point. I have felt betrayed by our government & I am shocked my the truth with regards to the Pope as well as being dismayed that Queen Elizabeth II and even more so some of her heirs are implicated within the corrupted ruling of our supposedly "Democratic" society!!! Unfortunately those who need to listen to this just won't.
The issue here is try explaining to the judge the following:
Whereas: “State” is a Federal term exclusively; and
Whereas: For purposes of tax under Title 26 U.S.C., “State” is defined in a political sense and
means the body politic of the District of Columbia and no other thing (supra, paragraph 39); and
Whereas: None of the 50 commonwealths united by and under authority of the Constitution and
admitted into the Union is a State, as Congress define “State” in Title 26 U.S.C.; and
Whereas: There is no definition of “state” in any statute of the 50 aforesaid commonwealths that
comprehends any such commonwealth as a state; and
Whereas: Any and all official, governmental use of “State” means the body politic of the District
of Columbia (and no other thing); and
Whereas: The government of every commonwealth united by and under authority of the
Constitution and admitted into the Union uses the Federal term “State” in its official title, i.e., State
of Alabama, State of Alaska, State of Arizona, State of Arkansas, State of California, State of
Colorado, State of Connecticut, State of Delaware, State of Florida, State of Georgia, State of
Hawaii, State of Idaho, State of Illinois, State of Indiana, State of Iowa, State of Kansas, State of
Kentucky, State of Louisiana, State of Maine, State of Maryland, State of Massachusetts, State of
Michigan, State of Minnesota, State of Mississippi, State of Missouri, State of Montana, State of
Nebraska, State of Nevada, State of New Hampshire, State of New Jersey, State of New Mexico,
State of New York, State of North Carolina, State of North Dakota, State of Ohio, State of
Oklahoma, State of Oregon, State of Pennsylvania, State of Rhode Island, State of South
Carolina, State of South Dakota, State of Tennessee, State of Texas, State of Utah, State of
Vermont, State of Virginia, State of Washington, State of West Virginia, State of Wisconsin, and
State of Wyoming; and
Whereas: Any government use of “State” means the body politic of the District of Columbia; e.g.,
“State of Alabama” means the body politic of the District of Columbia of Alabama,
I will review your bonus links later. Basically taxes are a sleight of hand under color of law, and there is no possible legal means of imposing direct and un-apportioned taxation in an state outside the Sate of District of Columbia which is not one of the states of the union by design.