This was always the goal for "human subjects". Yet, this subjugation is also the goal for patients, persons, individuals, or citizens... How and why? Tricking us out of free will by allowing us to assume we are one of these words.
Let's break this down: It is, and always was about free will and voluntarily participating through word magic.
This was always the goal for "human subjects". Yet, this subjugation is also the goal for patients, persons, individuals, or citizens... How and why? Tricking us out of free will by allowing us to assume we are one of these words.
Let's break this down: It is, and always was about free will and voluntarily participating through word magic.
Man and woman - aka mankind. The creation of the Creator - seed of consciousness, one level below creation - living soul. All other words above are NOT one of mankind.
All other terms are labels that we voluntarily "subject" ourselves to a lower status. So, if you think you are a "human, human being, patient, person, individual, or citizen", then feel free to let those legal codes, rules, acts, procedures, and statutes apply to you. Your choice.
Now, let's look at definitions shall we?
"Person" only exists in the English language. i have a close friend who speaks 6 languages fluently and a wife who speaks another language. Person does not exist in Creole, Portuguese, Spanish, French, Italian, or Russian. There are attempts to describe the word through phrases. However, it is a non living thing. We actually made it a bit of a game the other day and could not come p with a true direct translated word that meant what we think it means in the other languages.
• 26 USC 7701 (a) (1) Person The term “person” shall be construed to mean and include an individual, a trust, estate, partnership, association, company or corporation. ["notice how individual is included in this definition?"]
• A person is: “a variety of entities other than human beings.” Church of Scientology v U.S. Department of Justice, 612 F2d 417 (1979) at pg 418.
“…foreigners, not citizens…” United States v Otherson. 480 F Supp. 1369 (1979) at pg 1373.
“ ‘in common usage, the term ‘person’ does not include the sovereign, [and] statutes employing the [word] are normally construed to exclude it.’ Wilson v Omaha Tribe, 442 US653 667, 61 L. Ed 2d 153, 99 S Ct 2529 (1979) (quoting United States v Cooper Corp. 312 US 600, 604, 83 L. Ed 1071, 61 S Ct 742 (1941) See also United States v Mine Workers, 330 US 258, 273, 91 L. Ed 884. 67 S Ct 677 (1947)” Will v Michigan State Police, 491 US 58, 105 L. Ed. 2d 45, 109 S Ct 2304.
“a sovereign is not a person in a legal sense” In re Fox, 52 N.Y. 535, II Am. Rep. 751. U.S. v Fox, 94 U.S. 315, 241, Ed, 192
There is also the definition in Black's Law Dictionary that clearly has a "person" defined as anything BUT a man or woman.
As noted above - individual is included in the person definition. This word "individual" in other languages relates to inanimate objects or things. Yet, in English we assume it has something to so with us. But if we look at Maxim of Law Ejusdem Generis, we see that "individual" is of the same kind as the rest of the list in 26 USC and makes it a thing, aka a person.
• MAXIM OF LAW - Ejusdem Generis (eh-youse-dem generous) v adj. Latin for “of the same kind,” used to interpret loosely written statutes. Where a law lists specific classes of persons or things and then refers to them in general, the general statements only apply to the same kind of persons or things specifically listed. Example: if a law refers to automobiles, trucks, tractors, motorcycles and other motor-powered vehicles, “vehicles” would not include airplanes, since the list was of land-based transportation.
• Based on ejusdem generis Person and individual is a fictitious entity as in the rest of the list in 26 USC 7701.
How about "citizen"?
• "The privileges and immunities clause of the 14th Amendment protects very few rights because it neither incorporates the Bill of Rights, nor protects all rights of individual citizens. Instead this provision protects only those rights peculiar to being a citizen of the federal government; it does not protect those rights which relate to state citizenship." Jones v Temmer. 89 F. Supp 1226
• "A citizen of the United States is a citizen (14th amendment citizen) of the federal government ..." Kitchens v. Steele, 112 F.Supp 383
The word "citizen" presumes duties and responsibilities to a government. And, if it has "ship" at the end, it is presumed to be sea jurisdiction.
How about "human" or "human being"?
Hu(e)-man - a shade of man or color-of man. Color-of-law applies to the color of man.
Human being - “sea monster” - Ballentine’s Law Dictionary [“sea jurisdiction”]
Monster - a human being by birth, but in some part resembling a lower animal
Human - belonging or relative to man [“notice, not actually a man”] as distinguished from the Creator or superhuman beings - color of man
Starting to see the picture? All the words used above and in the government legal codes, rules, acts, statutes, and procedures ALL relate to things that are less than man or woman.
It is all voluntary. If you do not meet the definition, it does not apply to you. However, if you believe you are one of those THINGS, then by all means, by very scared. You have just volunteered to be a subject in their great experiment.
A few more words to think about:
Live - “evil” backwards
Children - chill [“cold”] + dren [“a strong healthy individual”] = an individual who must be made cold
Childhood - a “hood” is used to cloak and hide - cold and hidden
Parents - pair who rents
Born - Bare a child = Barren = unfaithful, bleak, and lifeless
Spelling - spell casting
This may all seem silly at first - but what is more silly? Believing you are something that you are actually not, and then subjecting yourself to the lies and evil games based on that misplaced belief, or starting over with your understanding of the words that enslave you?
After all, it is harder to believe what is true than to continue to believe a lie you have been told your entire life.
If listening to podcasts is of interest, Jennifer Goodwin does a decent job of summarizing, including a testimony from the Director of the IRS stating three times in the recorded hearing that we live in a system of taxation that is voluntary. https://open.spotify.com/episode/2OgmGqQccRKsdn1zqaua6b
Another good reference - besides the actual forms, codes, and definitions, is the book "Fruit From a Poisonous Tree" by Melvin Stamper. He covers the general history of the IRS in its various forms ["available at Amazon - https://www.amazon.com/dp/0595524966?psc=1&language=en_US"]. He includes the statute and code references as well that you can look up that confirm precisely what "2nd Smartest Guy..." clearly summarizes and articulates.
There is also a volume of case law ["largely Statutes at Large"] that clearly show the differences between the federal "citizen of the United States" ["body politic"] and a "Citizen" of one of the several states ["geographically defined"].
State-of-State and STATE-OF-STATE governments are one of the 50 body politic States referenced in this article as they are corporate entities established after the civil war and do not follow the Republican form of government delegate model defined in the letters, congressional notes, and actual 1787 Constitution ["ratified in 1789"]. Qualified voting ["qualified elector through a 14th amendment citizen of the United States"] is a whole additional captured "resident" trickery that is facilitated at the State ["STATE-of"] and County ["COUNTY-of"] corporate level.
There is another rabbit hole regarding property taxes as well. Again, it is volunteering to be a "resident" and hence a "tenant" or to be subjected to "tenancy". All mortgage and title paperwork, when transferring, has an affidavit signing location that has the signature being signed under penalty of perjury attesting to being a "resident". As such the local government, and thus the "resident" definition opens the volunteering of your property to the "State/STATE". This is well managed through color of title trickery by facilitation of false mortgages and banks who loan false money and become a third party joint title holder. But, if it is understood you are a man or woman and not a slave, you can ask who is the other man or woman who claims higher vested interest in your property.
This was always the goal for "human subjects". Yet, this subjugation is also the goal for patients, persons, individuals, or citizens... How and why? Tricking us out of free will by allowing us to assume we are one of these words.
Let's break this down: It is, and always was about free will and voluntarily participating through word magic.
Man and woman - aka mankind. The creation of the Creator - seed of consciousness, one level below creation - living soul. All other words above are NOT one of mankind.
All other terms are labels that we voluntarily "subject" ourselves to a lower status. So, if you think you are a "human, human being, patient, person, individual, or citizen", then feel free to let those legal codes, rules, acts, procedures, and statutes apply to you. Your choice.
Now, let's look at definitions shall we?
"Person" only exists in the English language. i have a close friend who speaks 6 languages fluently and a wife who speaks another language. Person does not exist in Creole, Portuguese, Spanish, French, Italian, or Russian. There are attempts to describe the word through phrases. However, it is a non living thing. We actually made it a bit of a game the other day and could not come p with a true direct translated word that meant what we think it means in the other languages.
• 26 USC 7701 (a) (1) Person The term “person” shall be construed to mean and include an individual, a trust, estate, partnership, association, company or corporation. ["notice how individual is included in this definition?"]
• A person is: “a variety of entities other than human beings.” Church of Scientology v U.S. Department of Justice, 612 F2d 417 (1979) at pg 418.
“…foreigners, not citizens…” United States v Otherson. 480 F Supp. 1369 (1979) at pg 1373.
“ ‘in common usage, the term ‘person’ does not include the sovereign, [and] statutes employing the [word] are normally construed to exclude it.’ Wilson v Omaha Tribe, 442 US653 667, 61 L. Ed 2d 153, 99 S Ct 2529 (1979) (quoting United States v Cooper Corp. 312 US 600, 604, 83 L. Ed 1071, 61 S Ct 742 (1941) See also United States v Mine Workers, 330 US 258, 273, 91 L. Ed 884. 67 S Ct 677 (1947)” Will v Michigan State Police, 491 US 58, 105 L. Ed. 2d 45, 109 S Ct 2304.
“a sovereign is not a person in a legal sense” In re Fox, 52 N.Y. 535, II Am. Rep. 751. U.S. v Fox, 94 U.S. 315, 241, Ed, 192
There is also the definition in Black's Law Dictionary that clearly has a "person" defined as anything BUT a man or woman.
As noted above - individual is included in the person definition. This word "individual" in other languages relates to inanimate objects or things. Yet, in English we assume it has something to so with us. But if we look at Maxim of Law Ejusdem Generis, we see that "individual" is of the same kind as the rest of the list in 26 USC and makes it a thing, aka a person.
• MAXIM OF LAW - Ejusdem Generis (eh-youse-dem generous) v adj. Latin for “of the same kind,” used to interpret loosely written statutes. Where a law lists specific classes of persons or things and then refers to them in general, the general statements only apply to the same kind of persons or things specifically listed. Example: if a law refers to automobiles, trucks, tractors, motorcycles and other motor-powered vehicles, “vehicles” would not include airplanes, since the list was of land-based transportation.
• Based on ejusdem generis Person and individual is a fictitious entity as in the rest of the list in 26 USC 7701.
How about "citizen"?
• "The privileges and immunities clause of the 14th Amendment protects very few rights because it neither incorporates the Bill of Rights, nor protects all rights of individual citizens. Instead this provision protects only those rights peculiar to being a citizen of the federal government; it does not protect those rights which relate to state citizenship." Jones v Temmer. 89 F. Supp 1226
• "A citizen of the United States is a citizen (14th amendment citizen) of the federal government ..." Kitchens v. Steele, 112 F.Supp 383
The word "citizen" presumes duties and responsibilities to a government. And, if it has "ship" at the end, it is presumed to be sea jurisdiction.
How about "human" or "human being"?
Hu(e)-man - a shade of man or color-of man. Color-of-law applies to the color of man.
Human being - “sea monster” - Ballentine’s Law Dictionary [“sea jurisdiction”]
Monster - a human being by birth, but in some part resembling a lower animal
Human - belonging or relative to man [“notice, not actually a man”] as distinguished from the Creator or superhuman beings - color of man
Starting to see the picture? All the words used above and in the government legal codes, rules, acts, statutes, and procedures ALL relate to things that are less than man or woman.
It is all voluntary. If you do not meet the definition, it does not apply to you. However, if you believe you are one of those THINGS, then by all means, by very scared. You have just volunteered to be a subject in their great experiment.
A few more words to think about:
Live - “evil” backwards
Children - chill [“cold”] + dren [“a strong healthy individual”] = an individual who must be made cold
Childhood - a “hood” is used to cloak and hide - cold and hidden
Parents - pair who rents
Born - Bare a child = Barren = unfaithful, bleak, and lifeless
Spelling - spell casting
This may all seem silly at first - but what is more silly? Believing you are something that you are actually not, and then subjecting yourself to the lies and evil games based on that misplaced belief, or starting over with your understanding of the words that enslave you?
After all, it is harder to believe what is true than to continue to believe a lie you have been told your entire life.
Which means paying income tax is voluntary...
On the tax forms it explicitly states compliance is "voluntary."
https://www.2ndsmartestguyintheworld.com/p/repost-memorandum-of-law-the-legality
Correct - all forms clearly state "voluntary".
If listening to podcasts is of interest, Jennifer Goodwin does a decent job of summarizing, including a testimony from the Director of the IRS stating three times in the recorded hearing that we live in a system of taxation that is voluntary. https://open.spotify.com/episode/2OgmGqQccRKsdn1zqaua6b
Another good reference - besides the actual forms, codes, and definitions, is the book "Fruit From a Poisonous Tree" by Melvin Stamper. He covers the general history of the IRS in its various forms ["available at Amazon - https://www.amazon.com/dp/0595524966?psc=1&language=en_US"]. He includes the statute and code references as well that you can look up that confirm precisely what "2nd Smartest Guy..." clearly summarizes and articulates.
There is also a volume of case law ["largely Statutes at Large"] that clearly show the differences between the federal "citizen of the United States" ["body politic"] and a "Citizen" of one of the several states ["geographically defined"].
State-of-State and STATE-OF-STATE governments are one of the 50 body politic States referenced in this article as they are corporate entities established after the civil war and do not follow the Republican form of government delegate model defined in the letters, congressional notes, and actual 1787 Constitution ["ratified in 1789"]. Qualified voting ["qualified elector through a 14th amendment citizen of the United States"] is a whole additional captured "resident" trickery that is facilitated at the State ["STATE-of"] and County ["COUNTY-of"] corporate level.
There is another rabbit hole regarding property taxes as well. Again, it is volunteering to be a "resident" and hence a "tenant" or to be subjected to "tenancy". All mortgage and title paperwork, when transferring, has an affidavit signing location that has the signature being signed under penalty of perjury attesting to being a "resident". As such the local government, and thus the "resident" definition opens the volunteering of your property to the "State/STATE". This is well managed through color of title trickery by facilitation of false mortgages and banks who loan false money and become a third party joint title holder. But, if it is understood you are a man or woman and not a slave, you can ask who is the other man or woman who claims higher vested interest in your property.