Like always in "virology" the method section in each of these so called "studies" describe procedures in Frankenstein style. We'll never see them mimic natural transmission routes in these experiments. They would lack the amount of damage that needs to be done to the Guinea pigs in order to provoke something that in the remotest possible…
Like always in "virology" the method section in each of these so called "studies" describe procedures in Frankenstein style. We'll never see them mimic natural transmission routes in these experiments. They would lack the amount of damage that needs to be done to the Guinea pigs in order to provoke something that in the remotest possible way looks like the reaction which needs to be "examined". Cell damage by injection into the abdominal cavity or brain inevitably leads to production of "antibodies" which are nothing else but a repair glue to seal the holes in the cell membrane. It's a survival tactic of the body. Each substance, forcibly injected into the tissue, would cause this effect, whether it be floral water or fictional viruses in a bizarre concoction of drugs and genetic mish mash.
Like always in "virology" the method section in each of these so called "studies" describe procedures in Frankenstein style. We'll never see them mimic natural transmission routes in these experiments. They would lack the amount of damage that needs to be done to the Guinea pigs in order to provoke something that in the remotest possible way looks like the reaction which needs to be "examined". Cell damage by injection into the abdominal cavity or brain inevitably leads to production of "antibodies" which are nothing else but a repair glue to seal the holes in the cell membrane. It's a survival tactic of the body. Each substance, forcibly injected into the tissue, would cause this effect, whether it be floral water or fictional viruses in a bizarre concoction of drugs and genetic mish mash.