The Most Important COVID-19 Debate
The below unedited exchange on whether COVID-19 was an accidental lab leak or a deliberate bioweapon attack took place two days ago between two scientists.
Scientist A is a molecular geneticist, entrepreneur and technologist.
Scientist B is a professor emeritus of epidemiology and senior research scientist in epidemiology at an Ivy League school.
A: These two articles by the pseudonymous author Dr. Ah Kahn Syed aka Arkmedic published give step by step instructions on how to use the "Blastin" US Gene Database to look up sequences to see if they are recorded as found in nature and also to check if sequences of both DNA and Amnio Acids are registered with the US patent office.
They showed that the infamous Furin cleavage site on the spike protein of Sarscov2 did not evolve naturally and that it was found in the US patent database owned and registered with none other than Moderna in 2015.
Arkmedic followed up with this article:
This is completely reproducible evidence that Sarscov2 is indeed manmade; it is a bioweapon, and it was not leaked, it was deliberately released.
It is time to stop using the propaganda narrative phrase "lab leak." It was a well-planned in advance bioterror operation.
B: Bioweapon does not follow. It proves the sequence was created by Moderna in hMSH3. That altered gene has a beneficial function in culturing SARS viruses in humanized mouse lung epithelial cells. Moderna designed the sequence so that it would incorporate itself into the SARS virus genome at replication, including the furin cleavage site. So Moderna made and loaded the gun and let WIV play with it until it fired. Does not prove that it is a bioweapon or that the release was intentional.
A: I already posted in this thread that I agree that on its own, a bioweapon does not follow, however, in the context of information I happened to come across in December 2019 from a whistleblower from Canada's only level 4 Bioweapons lab in Winnipeg coupled with Dr. Li-Meng Yan corroborating the story I told her, I am 100 percent convinced it was a bioweapon, and that is Dr. Li-Meng Yan's position as well.
Given the genocide that has ensued that was completely avoidable even without the information I inadvertently came across in December 2019 I do not believe that Moderna Pfizer et al. had anything altruistic in mind given that Pfizer was partners with the CCP as per Naomi Wolf's excellent research where she did to prove this:
B: More likely, Moderna created a risky tool to make a virus that would be managed with a vaccine that...Moderna would create. The Winnipeg activity was on the lipid nanoparticles as far as I understand, and the techs escaped to China with IP, but that doesn't imply that it was designed as a bioweapon. No smoking gun unless you can provide more specific evidence.
A: The lipid nanoparticles had nothing to do with the Level 4 Winnipeg bioweapons lab. The research for these was done by the University of British Columbia.
Subsequently, the University of British Columbia did a technology transfer agreement to Arbutus and Acuitis pharmaceuticals of Burnaby British Coulmbia. Canada gets a royalty each time a mRNA shot is sold; in fact, Canada has a monopoly on this technology. No wonder Justin Trudeau said in early April 2020, "no new normal until we have a vaccine" when this was not advertised at the time as the only solution.
The late Dr. Frank Plummer who headed up research at the Winnipeg lab did extensive research on SarsCov1 and Sarscov2:
B: So that gets the Trudeau family royalties which is major COI, but not smoking gun for bioweapon.
A: All well and good except as you are no doubt aware:
(This is beginning to sound like the Passover Song "Dayenu" ((and that alone would have been Enough!))
1)The perpetrators of these crimes went to a great deal of trouble to insist that this thing was of "natural origin". Arkmedic's work with the patent database dispelled that notion.
2) The crucial role of angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 (ACE2) in SARS coronavirus–induced lung injury has been known since 2005:
https://www.nature.com/articles/nm1267
3) Sure enough, the spike protein key lethal features all surround down regulating Ace2:
https://www.ahajournals.org/doi/full/10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.121.318902
You mentioned:
"The Furin cleavage site altered gene has a beneficial function in culturing SARS viruses in humanized mouse lung epithelial cells. Moderna designed the sequence so that it would incorporate itself into the SARS virus genome at replication, including the furin cleavage site."
The furin cleavage site also causes highly phosphorylated Tau which is toxic, neurodegenerative and fibril-producing. In AD, it has been observed that only 1% of Tau is of this hyperphosphorylated species. However, the sequence at Spike S1/S2 site (the most disordered part) also enables cleavage by furin and phospho‑regulation in SARS‑CoV2 BUT NOT in SARS‑CoV1 or MERS‑CoV!
As per this recent exchange with Dr. McCullough:
"Peter, I remember in Ocala asking Dr. Lin-Memg Yan if the two proline inserts in the s2 region of the injection Spike was deliberately done to create a spike that would present itself as a prion. She said yes, and of course warned against the injections.
It is unimaginable what Western civilization has devolved to, where empathy ends is where evil begins."
Dr. McCullough’s reply:
"It was loaded with every disease-promoting feature possible. Amazing."
The famous watchmaker's argument that supports the existence G-d could be deployed here where you argue that all of these genetically engineered and lethal features were an unfortunate coincidence that sadly led to a slow-kill bioweapon.
The difference, in this case, is that I got to talk with "G-d" ie the people that actually were doing this research: Dr. Li Meng Yan, and the whistleblower from the Winnipeg Lab. Dr Li Meng Yan who confirmed that the Chinese spies at the Winnipeg Lab ended up at the Wuhan lab and has published many papers that this was a bioweapon.
Trudeau has completely obstructed any enquires about what went on at the Winnipeg lab. Now we all know why!
B: I think the parallel damage is likely incidental. The virus's main goal is to use the ACE2 receptor to enter cells. How that is maximized is what evolved. It might have happened some other way, e.g., TMPRSS2 receptor (which original strain through delta used), but Moderna knew that FCS between S1/S2 enhanced ACE2-based cell entry (it is in their patents) so they engineered that feature. I don't know of convincing evidence that they engineered other toxic components of the spike protein. The S1/S2 FCS might not have evolved on its own had it not been engineered, but we will never know. Whether Moderna engineered the FCS to phosphorylate Tau seems unlikely--their main hurdle was getting the FCS into the viral genome without anyone noticing that they were responsible.
A: "I don't know of convincing evidence that they engineered other toxic components of the spike protein."
One of the main collaborators of this GOF Research was ZhengLi-Shi. This paper from 2010 shows that they inserted the HIV Glycoprotein 120 ostensibly to enhance infectivity:
https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s12250-010-3096-2.pdf
The HIV Glycoprotein 120 is a prion that induces prion diseases and this has been known for decades.
"Evidence is presented that gp120 causes an activation of phospholipase A2, resulting in the increased release of arachidonic acid, which may in turn sensitize the NMDA receptor."
Mechanisms of prionSc- and HIV-1 gp120 induced neuronal cell death - PubMed
In vitro experiments revealed that the scrapie prion protein, PrP(Sc), as well as the PrP fragment PrP106-126, a...
":Whether Moderna engineered the FCS to phosphorylate Tau seems unlikely."
The HIV Gp120 insert as described above has similar biochemistry. This is not a coincidence, and the scientific community involved in this research knew it very well.
"The S1/S2 FCS might not have evolved on its own had it not been engineered, but we will never know."
What we do know is that mutations happen one nucleotide at a time. For 12 additional nucleotides to evolve in that particular order on this particular virus statistically would take hundreds of thousands of years, if at all.
Taken in the context of the vaccine develop[ed around it where it was obvious that it would have no benefit as it would quickly become obsolete against a very specific protein sequence as the virus mutates and the pre pandemic preparations Event 201, etc. and finally the predictable lethal consequences as described above there is no doubt that this was a deliberately released slow kill bioweapon and the "vaccine' itself is part of it.
I have no doubt that the late Dr. Frank Plummer of the Winnipeg bioweapons lab was involved with Dr. Fauci et al. Even his widow shows this on her Twitter account:
Finally, B conceded that COVID-19 is in fact a bioweapon and posted this must listen podcast that confirms that A was in fact correct:
This substack has from the start been in the A camp re: both COVID-19 and the DEATHVAX™ are slow kill bioweapons, with the latter being far deadlier.
In other words, the “vaccine” was not made for the virus, the virus was made for the “vaccine.”
Do NOT comply.
Thanks 2nd. You ruined my night. I guess it was comforting to have just a smidgen of doubt left. You stole that.
The fight begins again tomorrow.
Luv Montagenair? said it was gain of function in June 2020 and instantly attacked for telling the truth!