It would have been just like direct un-apportioned taxation today subverted by the federal gov. EDIT: using a private corporation like the IRS as the legitimization of illegal theft via taxation.
The federal gov as outlined by the Founders is a foreign nation with the most essential and minimal more at restricted role or function in secur…
It would have been just like direct un-apportioned taxation today subverted by the federal gov. EDIT: using a private corporation like the IRS as the legitimization of illegal theft via taxation.
The federal gov as outlined by the Founders is a foreign nation with the most essential and minimal more at restricted role or function in securing borders and enforcing the Constitution and Bill of Rights across the united (lowercase "u") States of America. That is it. Nothing more.
On the state level then property taxes would be unconstitutional because the Constitution overrides any state law(s).
Basically, the Constitutional Republic was subverted by the likes of the spy Hamilton and the Federalists, and then of course 1913 was when the nation was (un)constitutionally taken over. Even the ratification of 16A is questionable, and it could not be ratified legally anyhow. It would be like creating an Amendment in direct opposition to any of the Bill of Rights amendments i.e. gun grabs on federal level and the existence of the ATF. Etc. & etc.
It would have been just like direct un-apportioned taxation today subverted by the federal gov. EDIT: using a private corporation like the IRS as the legitimization of illegal theft via taxation.
The federal gov as outlined by the Founders is a foreign nation with the most essential and minimal more at restricted role or function in securing borders and enforcing the Constitution and Bill of Rights across the united (lowercase "u") States of America. That is it. Nothing more.
On the state level then property taxes would be unconstitutional because the Constitution overrides any state law(s).
Basically, the Constitutional Republic was subverted by the likes of the spy Hamilton and the Federalists, and then of course 1913 was when the nation was (un)constitutionally taken over. Even the ratification of 16A is questionable, and it could not be ratified legally anyhow. It would be like creating an Amendment in direct opposition to any of the Bill of Rights amendments i.e. gun grabs on federal level and the existence of the ATF. Etc. & etc.