It’s definitely not free speech. In long gone days, it was called the hecklers’ veto in constitutional law and was declared unconstitutional and incompatible with the first amendment.
Now, it’s still considered incompatible but the problem is seen as the first amendment!
It’s definitely not free speech. In long gone days, it was called the hecklers’ veto in constitutional law and was declared unconstitutional and incompatible with the first amendment.
Now, it’s still considered incompatible but the problem is seen as the first amendment!
It’s definitely not free speech. In long gone days, it was called the hecklers’ veto in constitutional law and was declared unconstitutional and incompatible with the first amendment.
Now, it’s still considered incompatible but the problem is seen as the first amendment!