How many times have we heard the lies justifying submission to the DEATHVAX™ due to COVID risks of developing myocarditis and pericarditis far greater than the “Safe and Effective” slow kill bioweapon injection side effects?
Never forget Canadians, of which I am a member. There is so little critical thought here to speak of it's really eye-opening, BUT, again using comments as a guide, some of the normies here in the True North are even starting to wake up. Watching Chris Martenson's latest video about the huge number of deaths in Alberta from "undetermined" causes.
This large study finds zero increase in myocarditis and pericarditis post covid. Okay so …. Why are we tolerating these as an obvious side effect of covid vax? And, maybe more importantly, WHY ARE THE INJECTIONS CAUSING THESE?? They are based on chemical copies of Wuhan variant spike protein … but then uh oh why is the artificial one causing inflammation when the wild type is not?? Do not worry! Our new definition of “science” will allow us to ignore this and go happily on our way jabbing little six month old babies … what a strange world we have concocted for ourselves here …
I read a little Walter chestnut (becaose I am not technically inclined to read a lot of him) and I am growing more and more nervous about the virus. Certainly it appears to have some very “special features”? Still, I would expect the sars cov2 bio effects he is tracking (through literature and backward engineering) to show up in a large well-run study like this
I’m still laughing my ass off I haven’t had a cold in three years. Had sick people cough on me, rode elevators with them. Plenty of vitamins and 20 miles of walking a week at Work alone and no convid for me!
I'm not sure about "Long Covid" tbh. For example, I was chatting with Jacqui Deevoy (who broke the UK Midazolam story) on twitter quite a bit. One day I intruded on a conversation she was having with her daughter re: "long Covid", that her daughter was suffering from supposedly. I sent her daughter to Kory's long Covid protocol and (I think) Zelenko's.
I doubt that "based and redpilled" people on our side would be so stupid to fall for something like this is my point.
Re Genetically Modified Human, so far, the evidence that mRNA can make changes to DNA is weak. I’m not saying it’s not there, but it’s still pretty weak.
The weakness of evidence is due to our weirdly persistent trust in authoritative pronouncements instead of doing our own fact-checking.
From a clinical study published in Feb. 2022 and available free online:
"...a recent study showed that SARS-CoV-2 RNA can be reverse-transcribed and integrated into the genome of human cells.... [citing a paper published in PNAS May 2021]
Our results indicate a fast up-take of [Pfizer] BNT162b2 into human liver cell line Huh7, leading to changes in LINE-1 expression and distribution.
We also show that BNT162b2 mRNA is reverse transcribed intracellularly into DNA in as fast as 6 hours upon BNT162b2 exposure."
Cited by a grand total of 25 sources worldwide. So clearly there was nothing noteworthy here...
However, the May 2021 study mentioned IN the above study was funded by the NIH. And from that paper, we get hair-raising statements like this:
"We also found, in some patient-derived tissues, evidence suggesting that a large fraction of the viral sequences is transcribed from integrated DNA copies of viral sequences, generating viral–host chimeric transcripts."
Chimeric transcripts were confirmed - around 8 years ago - as prime suspects in triggering organ-specific cancers, esp. in the liver.
I couldn't find out whether they are thought to be permanent genetic changes which get passed to the next generation - but chimeric transcripts are part of the CRISPR technology, and CRISPR changes to DNA are admitted to be irreversible.
But I digress.
My point: It's been known for some time that mRNA can and does trigger retrotranscription to DNA, which in turn is linked to genotoxicity and cancer. And it was known that the Pfizer formula was likely to do all of the above. Yet the CDC, the WHO, the UN, et al. continue to call such claims "myths".
The study compares the results of the unvaxxed contracting Covid19 with the vaxxed having vaxx side effects and which group got the most myocarditis and pericarditis.
Sure the vaxxed were damaged the most, but did the unvaxxed really just have colds and flu? We should assume so.
The study is comparing apples with oranges. How useful can that be?
Very well said, thanks.
I just git over Long Covid .... 18 hours of the sniffles
FEAR FEAR FEAR FEAR FEAR FEAR
Great that we have this proof!
200,000 unvaxxed ... quite a number ... it turns out the real bozos were europeans and americanos ... they are getting triple boosters ...
Never forget Canadians, of which I am a member. There is so little critical thought here to speak of it's really eye-opening, BUT, again using comments as a guide, some of the normies here in the True North are even starting to wake up. Watching Chris Martenson's latest video about the huge number of deaths in Alberta from "undetermined" causes.
Great work, are you bucking for a promotion to the #1 smartest guy?
This Brannon Howse / Karen Kingston exposé interview about Dr. James Giordano is a mind blower!
https://www.worldviewweekend.com/tv/video/karen-kingston-plays-video-prof-james-giordano-georgetown-univ-chief-neuroethics-program
This large study finds zero increase in myocarditis and pericarditis post covid. Okay so …. Why are we tolerating these as an obvious side effect of covid vax? And, maybe more importantly, WHY ARE THE INJECTIONS CAUSING THESE?? They are based on chemical copies of Wuhan variant spike protein … but then uh oh why is the artificial one causing inflammation when the wild type is not?? Do not worry! Our new definition of “science” will allow us to ignore this and go happily on our way jabbing little six month old babies … what a strange world we have concocted for ourselves here …
Because the "vax" is the more effective slow kill bioweapon.
I read a little Walter chestnut (becaose I am not technically inclined to read a lot of him) and I am growing more and more nervous about the virus. Certainly it appears to have some very “special features”? Still, I would expect the sars cov2 bio effects he is tracking (through literature and backward engineering) to show up in a large well-run study like this
Shot till you drop.
Long Covax
I’m still laughing my ass off I haven’t had a cold in three years. Had sick people cough on me, rode elevators with them. Plenty of vitamins and 20 miles of walking a week at Work alone and no convid for me!
I'm not sure about "Long Covid" tbh. For example, I was chatting with Jacqui Deevoy (who broke the UK Midazolam story) on twitter quite a bit. One day I intruded on a conversation she was having with her daughter re: "long Covid", that her daughter was suffering from supposedly. I sent her daughter to Kory's long Covid protocol and (I think) Zelenko's.
I doubt that "based and redpilled" people on our side would be so stupid to fall for something like this is my point.
Appreciate your posts.
The clock is ticking on all, but double-time tics on those unfortunate enough to choose the 'safe and effective' prescribed remedy.
Re Genetically Modified Human, so far, the evidence that mRNA can make changes to DNA is weak. I’m not saying it’s not there, but it’s still pretty weak.
The weakness of evidence is due to our weirdly persistent trust in authoritative pronouncements instead of doing our own fact-checking.
From a clinical study published in Feb. 2022 and available free online:
"...a recent study showed that SARS-CoV-2 RNA can be reverse-transcribed and integrated into the genome of human cells.... [citing a paper published in PNAS May 2021]
Our results indicate a fast up-take of [Pfizer] BNT162b2 into human liver cell line Huh7, leading to changes in LINE-1 expression and distribution.
We also show that BNT162b2 mRNA is reverse transcribed intracellularly into DNA in as fast as 6 hours upon BNT162b2 exposure."
-- Curr. Issues Mol. Biol. 2022, 44(3), 1115-1126; https://doi.org/10.3390/cimb44030073
Funded mostly by the Swedish government.
Cited by a grand total of 25 sources worldwide. So clearly there was nothing noteworthy here...
However, the May 2021 study mentioned IN the above study was funded by the NIH. And from that paper, we get hair-raising statements like this:
"We also found, in some patient-derived tissues, evidence suggesting that a large fraction of the viral sequences is transcribed from integrated DNA copies of viral sequences, generating viral–host chimeric transcripts."
Chimeric transcripts were confirmed - around 8 years ago - as prime suspects in triggering organ-specific cancers, esp. in the liver.
I couldn't find out whether they are thought to be permanent genetic changes which get passed to the next generation - but chimeric transcripts are part of the CRISPR technology, and CRISPR changes to DNA are admitted to be irreversible.
But I digress.
My point: It's been known for some time that mRNA can and does trigger retrotranscription to DNA, which in turn is linked to genotoxicity and cancer. And it was known that the Pfizer formula was likely to do all of the above. Yet the CDC, the WHO, the UN, et al. continue to call such claims "myths".
Accept nothing. Check everything.
Thanks for sharing this data.
The study compares the results of the unvaxxed contracting Covid19 with the vaxxed having vaxx side effects and which group got the most myocarditis and pericarditis.
Sure the vaxxed were damaged the most, but did the unvaxxed really just have colds and flu? We should assume so.
The study is comparing apples with oranges. How useful can that be?