I agree that most if not all that congress publicizes is kabuki theater at best, but I don't know that Senator Kennedy is a proponent of the climate/carbon/control idiocracy. I haven't seen him advocating for the climate hoax, rather he appears to realize it's theater and uses his Will Rogers persona to make a point.
I agree that most if not all that congress publicizes is kabuki theater at best, but I don't know that Senator Kennedy is a proponent of the climate/carbon/control idiocracy. I haven't seen him advocating for the climate hoax, rather he appears to realize it's theater and uses his Will Rogers persona to make a point.
I did. I will admit that on the first read I skipped the twitter link (because I think twitter and the bullshit that emanates from that caustic cess pool has done more harm to the world than anything else), and after listening I did hear Senator Kennedy say, "...I'm all for carbon neutrality..." but I don't think that is a factual statement as much as a politically expedient statement to not instantly turn off the ears of the climate nazis.
Do I think the senator makes errors, makes generalizations, says things that he doesn't completely understand or supports, in order to gain influence and change the direction of the conversation and the country, sure. All politicians do.
But I also don't think he is an enemy of the truth. I don't think he is to be cast aside for a mid stream comment.
Robert F. Kennedy Jr. is not a Senator. His father was and his uncles were; John F. Kennedy (35th US President) and Edward M Kennedy respectively. As far as I am aware, he purports that so-called climate change (originally, global warming) is caused by activities of normal human living rather than having been intentionally caused by tropospheric nanoparticulate spraying/EMF bombardment of the ionosphere.
I see the problem. The post was originally about Kennedy of Louisiana but, why then was this used: "the surviving John Kennedy has nothing in common with the assassinated one?" I thought that was a pivot to RFK Jr. but you're saying it wasn't. My mistake. RJK Jr has been a proponent of man-made climate change rather than it being the result of geoengineering/EMF etc. I don't know if he has changed his position.
Maybe I missed something (?).
I agree that most if not all that congress publicizes is kabuki theater at best, but I don't know that Senator Kennedy is a proponent of the climate/carbon/control idiocracy. I haven't seen him advocating for the climate hoax, rather he appears to realize it's theater and uses his Will Rogers persona to make a point.
I suggest you carefully rewatch the clip, and then reread this article.
I did. I will admit that on the first read I skipped the twitter link (because I think twitter and the bullshit that emanates from that caustic cess pool has done more harm to the world than anything else), and after listening I did hear Senator Kennedy say, "...I'm all for carbon neutrality..." but I don't think that is a factual statement as much as a politically expedient statement to not instantly turn off the ears of the climate nazis.
Do I think the senator makes errors, makes generalizations, says things that he doesn't completely understand or supports, in order to gain influence and change the direction of the conversation and the country, sure. All politicians do.
But I also don't think he is an enemy of the truth. I don't think he is to be cast aside for a mid stream comment.
See my above comment. We need to be precise and accurate.
To your point, 2nd, Kennedy did not have to say "I'm all for carbon neutrality ".
I think he said it twice.
My question is why he takes this stance at all...
Has he publicly repudiated the life cycle?
We are not allowed to lie, mislead, or otherwise do evil for a potential good reason (Romans 3:8).
Robert F. Kennedy Jr. is not a Senator. His father was and his uncles were; John F. Kennedy (35th US President) and Edward M Kennedy respectively. As far as I am aware, he purports that so-called climate change (originally, global warming) is caused by activities of normal human living rather than having been intentionally caused by tropospheric nanoparticulate spraying/EMF bombardment of the ionosphere.
We are talking about Senator John Neely Kennedy of Louisiana, who is NOT related to the New England Kennedy dynasty.
I see the problem. The post was originally about Kennedy of Louisiana but, why then was this used: "the surviving John Kennedy has nothing in common with the assassinated one?" I thought that was a pivot to RFK Jr. but you're saying it wasn't. My mistake. RJK Jr has been a proponent of man-made climate change rather than it being the result of geoengineering/EMF etc. I don't know if he has changed his position.