I did. I will admit that on the first read I skipped the twitter link (because I think twitter and the bullshit that emanates from that caustic cess pool has done more harm to the world than anything else), and after listening I did hear Senator Kennedy say, "...I'm all for carbon neutrality..." but I don't think that is a factual statem…
I did. I will admit that on the first read I skipped the twitter link (because I think twitter and the bullshit that emanates from that caustic cess pool has done more harm to the world than anything else), and after listening I did hear Senator Kennedy say, "...I'm all for carbon neutrality..." but I don't think that is a factual statement as much as a politically expedient statement to not instantly turn off the ears of the climate nazis.
Do I think the senator makes errors, makes generalizations, says things that he doesn't completely understand or supports, in order to gain influence and change the direction of the conversation and the country, sure. All politicians do.
But I also don't think he is an enemy of the truth. I don't think he is to be cast aside for a mid stream comment.
I did. I will admit that on the first read I skipped the twitter link (because I think twitter and the bullshit that emanates from that caustic cess pool has done more harm to the world than anything else), and after listening I did hear Senator Kennedy say, "...I'm all for carbon neutrality..." but I don't think that is a factual statement as much as a politically expedient statement to not instantly turn off the ears of the climate nazis.
Do I think the senator makes errors, makes generalizations, says things that he doesn't completely understand or supports, in order to gain influence and change the direction of the conversation and the country, sure. All politicians do.
But I also don't think he is an enemy of the truth. I don't think he is to be cast aside for a mid stream comment.
See my above comment. We need to be precise and accurate.