1 Comment
User's avatar
⭠ Return to thread
Skip's avatar

Thanks to 2nd, with whom I fully agree, here. I know what Carbon is. I know what neutrality means. I’ve never bothered to give the “in” phrase, “Carbon Neutrality” any value as the entire “danger” of the mild warming natural cycle and blaming man has no scientific foundation, but speculation, based on deliberately misleading public by inferring that the original IPCC reports blamed man for the warming. No, there was neither consensus nor even discussion of any possible role of man. Not an included subject. Many scientists involved in the IPCC studies complained about their work being misrepresented. Further, the dumb butts crying about CO2 and its element Carbon are waving their ignorance. We don’t hear any of these reality ignorants mentioning that CO2 is food for plants and, therefore, for man, nor how low the current percentage is compared to our planet’s previous levels. By the way, we are a carbon based life form. An element kinda of important to us, well, perhaps a little more than kinda. Gotta smile.

Expand full comment