I’m with you. No jabs since the first Swine Flu shot in the late 70s. 50 deaths and they ended it . But enough got it and the chronic fatigue/fibromyalgia epidemic was started from a mouse protein within it!( Dr. Judy Mikovits) Out of work for 43 years!
Interesting food for thought. I think I'm going to have to disagree with Dr. Yeadon for once. I heard him say something similar to I think, Fuellmich recently. I was pretty taken aback by it.
I keep posting this because I think it's extremely important.
"SARS-CoV-2, hereafter referred to as SARSR-CoV-WIV, is a synthetic spike protein chimera engineered to attach to human ACE2 receptors and inserted into a recombinant bat SARSr-COV backbone.
It is likely a live vaccine not yet engineered to a more attenuated state that the program sought to create with its final version. It leaked and spread rapidly because it was aerosolized so it could efficiently infect bats in caves, but it was not ready to infect bats yet, which is why it does not appear to infect bats.
The reason the disease is so confusing is because it is less a virus than it is engineered spike proteins hitch-hiking a ride on a SARSr-CoV quasispecies swarm. The closer it is to the final live attenuated vaccine form, the more likely that it has been deattenuating since initial escape in August 2019."
I think a large part of the problem is we are screwing with things that we don't understand. I highly doubt anyone on the planet has grasped the full implications of quasispecies swarms.
I also don't rule out the possibility of two viruses being released. Fauci knows what is going on, perhaps send him on holiday to US-held territory in Cuba for a week's R&R to jog his memory?
So the way I interpret what Yeadon is saying, is that natural respiratory viruses such as flu do indeed exist
But that a completely artificial bioengineered virus can be constructed nucleotide by nucleotide in a laboratory..
I think he is arguing that Sars COV 1 ,Sars COV 2 and MERS were tinkered with/created in the lab.
Deadly sequences from various viruses ,with known pathological effects, were incorporated( in the lab )to make them more infectious to humans.As early as 2002 the technology was readily availble to scientists and cost very little to use.These new viruses were then later either deliberately or accidentally released.But just enough sequences of naturally occuring viruses known to infect animals were included ,so that plausible deniabilty could be invoked."Oh it wasn't us" they could say ",it jumped from the camel population to humans" ,oh it jumped from the bat populations to humans exctr.
What you just said is exactly what I think, yes. I agree 100%.
Dr. David Martin has most of the receipts on this as well.
My point is that SARS-COV-2 is not a normal, or perhaps in many ways, even a "real" virus. And I am convinced that quasispecies swarm is vital to everything.
Watch the whole thing, he is doubting that any virus exists. And many many more, once they have learned the whole history, are starting to agree with him. Including me.
At this point, I think these viruses exist largely with the genetic sequences they are believed to have. They are obviously lab-made. The Omicron variants differ from each other so much that they also have to be lab-made.
To make these viruses seem like threats, however, they must be "helped" greatly. Not just hyped, not just a pandemic of false positives, but people have to be poisoned and deprived, in order for these viruses to become threats to at least some of us.
The pandemic pattern is quite weird, where we have cities that are hard-hit, but neighboring cities with strong travel and economic connections are only mildly affected. This suggests the virus itself has a mild effect, unless it's helped in some way that is local to specific areas.
We can also suspect that the Queen would not be meeting people, and Boris Johnson's office would not be throwing parties, if they thought the virus was an actual threat.
"To make these viruses seem like threats, however, they must be "helped" greatly. Not just hyped, not just a pandemic of false positives, but people have to be poisoned and deprived, in order for these viruses to become threats to at least some of us."
- Yes, Covid was a spectacularly weak virus compared to previous Pandemic viruses. That's why I call it a pseudopandemic, it doesn't have anywhere near the lethality to justify the term "Pandemic".
There is no doubt they massively exaggerated the kill rate with the nonsensical "died with Covid" after a positive PCR test within x days. They REALLY got the party started by moving elderly Covid patients into old people's homes.
In my opinion, this is just further evidence of premeditation and psyoping people.
"The pandemic pattern is quite weird, where we have cities that are hard-hit, but neighboring cities with strong travel and economic connections are only mildly affected"
Again I come back to the quasispecies swarm aspect. It seems that only 10-15% of the population is susceptible to any given variant. "Scientists don't know why this is" but I bet it can be explained by the quasispecies swarm phenomena.
"The quasispecies swarm model approaches RNA viruses not as discrete genotypes transmitted on by discrete strains, but instead as quasispecies of mutant swarms of virions which carry distinct but complimentary sets of alleles – collections of genes thought to work together – which work in concert in real-time to establish and expand infections. One of the first empirical changes that comes once you consider an RNA virus as a quasispecies is that at any point in time an average of all the extant variants’ genomes serves as the smallest selective unit, as opposed to using individual virions or any single extant genome in a population, the classical approach.
This quasispecies viral swarming is an amorphous behavior that describes the search for fitness that occurs as each successive generation of the swarm produces another spectra of mutations, with the term “quasispecies” specifically describing “distributions of non-identical but related genomes subjected to a continuous process of genetic variation, competition, and selection, and which act as a unit of selection.”
Each of these distributions can be considered clouds of allelic statistical possibilities, each of which represents the spectrum of mutations that can be expected to emerge within a set number of generations, so their ratios will be constantly changing over successive generations and in different environmental settings.
This type of effect has just begun to be explored within the classical model, by quantifying the antigenic waves that shimmer across the surface of quasispecies mutant swarms as they shift between the host populations, and using these measurements to indirectly measure the quasispecies swarm itself without really getting the full picture of what’s really going on.
With quasispecies viruses replicating continually once a successful infection has set in and begun to smolder, the most-fit variant for a given tissue will predominate in that one tissue when a sample is taken only from it. However, although only one variant will appear in the smoky quasispecies mutant swarm infecting the tissue, the smoldering infection will be continually throwing off new variants which represent different points in the possible mutational spectrum – some of which will be better adapted to neighboring tissue, and others acting as accelerants for the predominate variant, intensifying its virulence."
The only analogy I have for this is backtesting/optimizing trading systems. You use genetic backtesting and optimization which selects for "fitness" of variations of a given strategy. It often takes several hours to backtest a strategy with many parameters to find the one with the best fitness. The fitness is another variable - percentage profitability, drawdown, average trade duration, profit factor, etc.
So the idea is, within the swarm, it takes time to develop parameters such as infectivity, virulence, range of symptoms, etc. Because this takes time, it has the effect of not infecting everyone immediately. By the time it infects a certain subset of the population, it has evolved again to create a new strain that has to start the process again.
To calculate how this works in reality would take a supercomputer. It may even be impossible. It's evolutionary biology at its finest.
It's a crap analogy because most people won't know what I'm talking about, but it's the best I've got. 😀
Hey Rich. I know we disagree on this issue but I do agree with the basic premise. Covid is only dangerous to people who are very ill or very old. The average age of a Covid death is older than the average life expectancy.
The whole thing was a massive scam that was designed to get people to take an extremely dangerous "vaccine" they didn't need. It's not just Johnson, it's politicians all over the world. Their actions show that they aren't frightened of the virus as they break their own policies and rules.
It was and remains an IQ test.
The problem with Geert is that he is writing for an audience that isn't us. He's writing for his peers, in the hope that they wake up from their deluded trance. This is why he refuses to write what he clearly knows. He knows that mass-death is imminent - make no mistake about that, he hints at it all the time but will never say the quiet part loud. I read everything he writes and it's a mindfuck because he is all over the place. This is also why he appears to contradict himself in his own articles. It's very difficult to say what you mean without saying what you mean.
He also knows many of his peers are multi-vaxxed, and that if he starts going "full realist" then he will scare those peers to death.
In essence, what he is trying to do is put an arm around someone and give them a "come to Jesus moment", as the Yanks say. In reality, sometimes you need to scream in someone's face that they are morons and need to wake up.
I agree, SARS-COV-2 is not a real virus. It's a Frankenstein's Monster. I totally get why people don't think Covid exists because it's such a huge scam (e.g. I think 17,000 people have died OF Covid in the UK in two and a half years, a bad flu season in the UK can kill four times that many people in a few months). But if we say that the "virus" doesn't exist then we are letting the criminals who perpetrated this off the hook. We have the receipts. We know they did the GoF research and we know that the fruits of their labour were the vaxxes - which I continue to contend were the whole point.
Quasispecies Swarm theory should be an olive branch to terrain theorists because it fits with a lot of what they are saying. Ironically, viruses need their own "terrain" to be able to do what they do. Looking at it through the lens of genetic algorithm backtesting and optimization makes perfect sense. Selecting for "fitness" as it moves through a population, until it finally manages to become "fit" enough to do what it does. I totally see how that works.
I don't pretend to have all the answers but I got the coof and it was completely unlike any illness I have ever had before. Fortunately it was a nothing burger that lasted for five hours, but the brain fog was something I have only ever experienced when I was a small child trying to imagine an infinite universe. My brain temporarily stopped working for a while. It was very strange.
Cheers Rich. I have no time for Foucault and his BS. I create trading systems for markets like Forex, CFDs, Futures etc so backtesting and optimization is extremely important. What you are effectively doing is creating a "swarm" of variables and using a form of evolutionary biology (genetic algorithms) to compute the best variables you are selecting for. It sounds complicated but it's actually very easy to understand and do.
I get this take on the debate, but if we are fighting, we are doing it to ourselves, virus theory is a house of cards built on a plate of jelly. Its vital that contagion with a pure isolate
Detection of SARS-CoV-2 in fecal samples goes back to 2020 Spain and Milan Italy, where it had shown up in sewage.
We also know SARS-CoV-2 exists because those of us who had COVID naturally show antibodies to both the spike protein and the nucleocapsid protein, whereas one of the many problems of the vaccinated is they only make antibodies to the now long gone Wuhan spike protein, but not the nucleocapsid protein of the virus.
The bottom line is as you said, it is an utter waste of time to argue about presence or absence of a virus. PSYOP-19 is about a lot of horrible things: genocide, tyranny, grand larceny of the already mega-rich against everyone else. But it was not at all about a virus.
I was talking about being a teacher and not getting sick from kids’ colds in a Substack and was told by a person that I couldn’t catch anything from my kids. That’s when I got my first no germ theory information.
Somewhere along the way, that person or another told me that new info was coming out about rabies and that it wasn’t a virus. My reply was that I’d take the rabies vaccine, but they didn’t have to if they didn’t want to. I got no reply to that, but it doesn’t matter. I’m taking that vax if I need it because I’m pretty sure something in the saliva of a rabid animal is contagious. I guess not taking the rabies vax if needed is ultimate way to prove your beliefs.
I’m just about ready to throw up my hands and just stop caring about any of this at all because all the virus/no virus, on top of all the other stuff, is wearing me out. Maybe that’s the whole point, though.
I hope people are not so foolish as to not take it, but I notice when people say vaccines don’t work and they’ll never take another, they forgot about this one. I also don’t really trust other vaccines right now because of the C vaccine and all I’ve leaned about vaccines and big pharma. It’s also hard to trust medical professionals now, too. (I never trusted the government.)
I don’t know if I was harmed by vaccines or if I harmed my child by getting her vaxxed or even if vaccines did any good at all. I just know that I’ll be eager to take the rabies vax if necessary.
Here’s a not so fun fact: a handful of people have gotten rabies from cornea transplants.
If they are using PCR to detect SARS-CoV-2, they are only detecting fragments of what they purport the genome is (2 or 3 genes). Is there any evidence that they have detected a full intact particle of SARS-CoV-2?
As for being an utter waste of time, if there are no viruses, a lot of issues will no longer be relevant. That is worth knowing the truth.
PCR is utterly bogus as a test for infectious diseases. Its inventor, the late Kary Mullis, warned of that, when he saw that this manufacturing technique was being misused. I wrote about that here:
If people waste time trying to prove or disprove existence of a virus, enormous undertakings to try to establish exhaustive proof one way or the other of that - which was utterly irrelevant to COVID tyranny rollout - then valuable time and energy will be wasted while our human rights are violated.
COVID is about tyranny, and how much a sheep-like populace will accept. That's it. That's the important topic.
Tyranny is an important topic. The reason for the tyranny is also an important topic. It could be argued that if they didn't use health as a reason they could use something else. True, but health is something that affects everyone, that is why it is such an important topic. If infectious disease is accepted as not real, then they have lost one major money and control funnel. War is good for business. Disease and viruses are good for business.
If they lose viruses as an enemy they have far less to work with in terms of terrorizing every single individual. The could move on to money or food but that threatens survival and is likely impossible to keep a lid on. Tests, masks, lockdowns and quackcination can all continue or at least be attempted as long as they have the enemy of a virus to fight.
I do see your point, and should have clarified that I do, which I believe is:
If viruses don't exist, then the entire pretext of the current tyranny crumbles to dust.
However, my points are:
1) Proving that viruses either definitely do or don't exist is exhausting labor, a huge distraction, and may be impossible, even with state of the art microscopy, and more importantly:
2) It didn't have to be viruses that served as a pretext for tyranny. It could have been contact with allegedly poisonous cockroach exoskeleton, or the barbs on the back of cricket legs, or antbites, or sunlight, or inhaling nitrogen, (80% of air) or anything that could be weaponized to the point of mass formation, to get the sheep running trembling into lockdown and self-suffocation.
And nobody denies that roaches, crickets, ants, nitrogen or sunlight exist.
1) I don't see why it is exhausting. If they have the tech to make an mRNA strand and put it in a quackcine, I don't understand how they can not detect such as well.
2) I don't think using insects or sunlight will work anywhere near as well as proposing contagious disease. The data already shows there is no pandemic, it will be very hard to sell a story based on insects, nitrogen or sunlight.
Okay, but antibiotic-resistant bacteria can be as easily blamed as a virus. Cholera wiped out NYC in the 1840's, far more devastating than any virus. Scarlet fever, bubonic plague were also far more devastating than any virus. All bacterial. Must we also deny the existence of bacteria?
You say people will not be fooled by sunlight or nitrogen or insect proteins, but a nothing burger virus, SARS-CoV-2, with a 99.85% survival rate (IFR = 0.015%, had the.idiots all masking up and ducking under their furniture. So any scam could fool them.
I respect your viewpoint by the way, just disagreeing.
Exactly. Viruses are way more likely to exist than not. It's practically indisputable. As I've said many times to virus deniers, explain why measles rash looks very different from shingles rash, looks very different than mumps. They have no answer, except, 'Well, that must be some pollutant,' but they never name the specific pollutants.
Sure, it would be convenient for all COVID -related tyranny to miraculously disappear if you could prove viruses don't exist. But, for better or worse, that contradicts reality. The tyranny itself is the problem, NOT this very easily defeated viral infection.
Internal bickering doesn't help our cause, I think it's better to call a virus as a gene fragment or peptide or a toxic gene fragment. Therefore spike proteins, venom proteins and you name it, are all under the classification of really small things considered as bioweapons. The one error I think the non virus people make is assuming the method of transmission must be from mucous or lung fluid. Would it not be the breath, the air to be sampled? Or the microflora of the skin that the infected may be depositing on their environment?
that clip takes yeadon out of context. what he said was "respiratory viruses don't exist as i understood them." dr. kevin stilllwagon does the best takedown of the false dichotomy of pathogen-vs-terrain "theory," neither is a theory, both are real. https://drkevinstillwagon.substack.com/p/the-silent-killers-e33
think it's time we parked the exploding pinto and fired up the atv
ny- yes assuming that both Terrain and Germ are valid, and then move on solves the problem. As your link reinforces, being healthy comes down to promoting a strong Terrain, but in a pinch some strong medicine like garlic etc helps the body buy some time to get a stronger terrain.
I never took a flu shot because the first patient in hospital I ever "took care of"
(still under the tutelage of my unit educator) was a late 30's women with,
"Guillain–Barré syndrome is a rapid-onset muscle weakness caused by the immune system damaging the peripheral nervous system." This was post a basic flu shot, (1981) and her suffering and the
damage were profound. That scared the heck out of me, and never wanting any medications
anyway, I never considered a flu shot ever. I believe there are covid viruses and I am aware of
the common cold spreading mostly by little kids in school environments because sneezes and
secretions are available for uptake by one and all. They are "building their immune systems"
so to speak. The parents "catch" the bug and bring it to work and spread it to their contacts.
Virus start as particles entering the cells, and using RNA develop into spider-like forms and
kill the cell, bursting out and back into particles, moving on to enter other cells. We used to
say, (it was a common saying) that the person discovering a cure for the common cold would
be a millionaire. Maybe I am full of beans, but that was what I learned in my chemistry, organic
chemistry, and microbiology college classes. Older people will recognize "clepping out"
of required courses by taking a test and getting it right and getting the college credit for
the effort. I clepped out of 2 courses/ Biology and Basic English.
While that ("there are no respiratory viruses") is exactly what I said, I encourage people to focus on the most important conclusion I have drawn. Nobody should care what I think about the General category “respiratory viruses”. At least, I don’t think they should.
I do however think people should consider the evidence for & against the existence specifically of SARS-CoV-2 as described by the same people & organisations who have literally done nothing but lie to us for over 2.5 years.
The evidence is starkly against it being the cause of massed illness and deaths.
If I’m reading the evidence correctly, the implications of course are profound: there’s no pandemic & everything installed in its name can & should be swept away overnight, and normal life resumed to the extent possible.
So please, set aside the general argument & focus instead only on the specific (SARS-CoV-2). Otherwise the propagandists will exploit our prior general beliefs & thereby maintain the illusion of a pandemic. There is no pandemic.
I never fell for the PsyOP due to my good doctor friend who, in January 2020, recommended daily doses of Vitamins D & C, zinc and green tea (the enzyme allows zinc to enter the cell and do its work). I've had never a sniffle since.
Let´s keep it simple: For Covid: If there is a virus in my throat than you take saliva and you will find it under a microscope. If you don´t have a microscope which can see it, take the saliva and infect some other person with it. Show me! Let´s move on to AIDS: If there is a virus, you may take a blood samlple, saliva or any other body fluid and see it under the microscope. You take the sample and infect somebody with it. Was this ever shown? NO. If you were diasgnosed with HIV, they gave you ACT and told you, you have to take it for the rest of your life. ACT is killing everybody. It is a strong poison that creates all the symptoms they than call AIDS. These White Coats are killing us! It starts with the first antibiotic you take. The antibiotic has strong effects on the body which are later on considered an illness, and they give you more chemicals to supress the symptom, which causes more havoc in your body, more symptoms, more chemicals, more symptoms and on and on. Same with high blood pressure: You have to take a chemical to supress this symptom and it sets you on the road to a slow death. Why do you think people in their 60th ending up taking 6 or more medications every day? Because the White Coats healed you? NO. They are making you a life long customer to the Pharma industrie. Stop believing in the Rockefeller medical system!
You can believe in whatever cult you like, no problem. I live since more than 30 years without this so called medical system and I am happy and healthy with it.
My 18 year old son is the smartest guy I know in the world. Lol. I tell him all the time as he helps his momma with lots of things and I don’t know what I would do without him. Lol. : )
This substack writer is definitely the second smartest guy in the world though!!!! He’s my imaginary other son. Lol.
You know.... what’s his real name? I never looked. Lol.
Great writing and articles. So clever!! So refreshing. Love this stack. : )
Oh WOW! Yeadon has changed his tune. I distinctly recall him declaring, not so long ago, on his Telegram channel, that he absolutely could not agree with those who say viruses do not exist; I would love to hear him talk about this as it must have taken some very compelling evidence to change the mind of an expert in respiratory medicine to now deny the existence of viruses.
If I understand it properly, the ‘terrain argument’ is that these violations of our civil liberties are being permitted due to the contagion concept, but if we eliminate contagion, we eliminate that permission. I would instead say, TPTB will always find a reason to violate historical civil liberties in favour of ‘collectivism’, contagion or no contagion, and our resistance to this must rely on bedrock principles deeper than that. Our freedoms can only be constrained when our actions directly and demonstratively place others in danger, a traditional understanding of western Christian societies, which grew out of common law, and the reformed faith...one reason ‘asymptomatic spread’ and ‘healthy quarantine’ are EVIL, as they provide an excuse for these ongoing State violations of liberty. (Hello Trudeau et al) Meanwhile the vast majority of churches go along with this still...and call it ‘love for neighbour’. I can’t even....Rant over. Goodnight.
Thanks, good read. Hasn’t seen that, but having read some of the ‘ant-vaxxer🤪tomes...I’m still on the fence about the risk/reward. Maybe I haven’t read enough. Have you checked out El Gato’s recent stack on this issue? Interesting for sure...one thing I do know...they will have to shoot me first if they want to jab me!
"So the challenge is impossible to satisfy. They either don't know how sequencing works or they want to discredit virology. As Dr. Yeadon argued other pathogens can cause illness. The problem with that notion is why do you find the pathogenic spike protein sequence and more importantly the unique Furin cleavage site only on SARsCOV2 positive patients?"
This answer is pathetic. You don't do genetic sequencing to isolate a virus. It's a very simple process Cowan et al have defined. You do NOT add any chemicals, toxins, or monkey kidney cells to the sample from which you are going to isolate the virus. They do this every time. Then when they starve the cells of nutrients and observe cell death they say it is caused by a virus! They never simply separate out the virus particle itself from a pure sample and then PROVE it causes disease. Robert Koch defined how to do it. And you cannot detect a virus using PCR. It is absurd to claim you can. The virus has to be shown to exist in nature. This has never been done for HIV, The measles, Polio, SARS-CoV2 or any of these so-called viruses. Look up the Bardens vs Lanka case where the German authorities were forced to admit there is no evidence for the existence of the measles virus.
Quit a while ago I decided no more flu shots or shots of any kind due to total lack of trust. Not even a tetanus shot. This body is done.
I stopped 5 yrs ago... I just don't get sick anymore, except very light colds
A cold that lasts more than24 hours.... I call it Long Covid✌
I wanna be part of the bullshit, but on my terms
Nice!!
I’m with you. No jabs since the first Swine Flu shot in the late 70s. 50 deaths and they ended it . But enough got it and the chronic fatigue/fibromyalgia epidemic was started from a mouse protein within it!( Dr. Judy Mikovits) Out of work for 43 years!
Don't forget to extend this to your pets!
My wife and I are having fight on this. Needles and the damage done
Did that on a recent annual exam with one of my dogs.
So true, the pet vaccine schedule is out of contol. My pets its rabies vax and thats it.
https://2ndsmartestguyintheworld.substack.com/p/in-response-to-steve-kirschs-latest
Interesting food for thought. I think I'm going to have to disagree with Dr. Yeadon for once. I heard him say something similar to I think, Fuellmich recently. I was pretty taken aback by it.
I keep posting this because I think it's extremely important.
"SARS-CoV-2, hereafter referred to as SARSR-CoV-WIV, is a synthetic spike protein chimera engineered to attach to human ACE2 receptors and inserted into a recombinant bat SARSr-COV backbone.
It is likely a live vaccine not yet engineered to a more attenuated state that the program sought to create with its final version. It leaked and spread rapidly because it was aerosolized so it could efficiently infect bats in caves, but it was not ready to infect bats yet, which is why it does not appear to infect bats.
The reason the disease is so confusing is because it is less a virus than it is engineered spike proteins hitch-hiking a ride on a SARSr-CoV quasispecies swarm. The closer it is to the final live attenuated vaccine form, the more likely that it has been deattenuating since initial escape in August 2019."
This is from the Veritas DARPA leaks.
https://redstate.com/jenvanlaar/2022/01/11/new-us-military-report-states-covid-19-was-created-by-a-us-funded-ecohealth-alliance-program-at-wuhan-institute-of-virology-n504679
It is highly unlikely that DARPA would tell lies internally, although it is possible that this got into Veritas' hands because it's a psyop.
However, I have read every article from harvard2thebighouse on Substack and this is his assertion as well.
https://harvard2thebighouse.substack.com/
I think a large part of the problem is we are screwing with things that we don't understand. I highly doubt anyone on the planet has grasped the full implications of quasispecies swarms.
I also don't rule out the possibility of two viruses being released. Fauci knows what is going on, perhaps send him on holiday to US-held territory in Cuba for a week's R&R to jog his memory?
So the way I interpret what Yeadon is saying, is that natural respiratory viruses such as flu do indeed exist
But that a completely artificial bioengineered virus can be constructed nucleotide by nucleotide in a laboratory..
I think he is arguing that Sars COV 1 ,Sars COV 2 and MERS were tinkered with/created in the lab.
Deadly sequences from various viruses ,with known pathological effects, were incorporated( in the lab )to make them more infectious to humans.As early as 2002 the technology was readily availble to scientists and cost very little to use.These new viruses were then later either deliberately or accidentally released.But just enough sequences of naturally occuring viruses known to infect animals were included ,so that plausible deniabilty could be invoked."Oh it wasn't us" they could say ",it jumped from the camel population to humans" ,oh it jumped from the bat populations to humans exctr.
What you just said is exactly what I think, yes. I agree 100%.
Dr. David Martin has most of the receipts on this as well.
My point is that SARS-COV-2 is not a normal, or perhaps in many ways, even a "real" virus. And I am convinced that quasispecies swarm is vital to everything.
Watch the whole thing, he is doubting that any virus exists. And many many more, once they have learned the whole history, are starting to agree with him. Including me.
At this point, I think these viruses exist largely with the genetic sequences they are believed to have. They are obviously lab-made. The Omicron variants differ from each other so much that they also have to be lab-made.
To make these viruses seem like threats, however, they must be "helped" greatly. Not just hyped, not just a pandemic of false positives, but people have to be poisoned and deprived, in order for these viruses to become threats to at least some of us.
The pandemic pattern is quite weird, where we have cities that are hard-hit, but neighboring cities with strong travel and economic connections are only mildly affected. This suggests the virus itself has a mild effect, unless it's helped in some way that is local to specific areas.
We can also suspect that the Queen would not be meeting people, and Boris Johnson's office would not be throwing parties, if they thought the virus was an actual threat.
Well said.
"To make these viruses seem like threats, however, they must be "helped" greatly. Not just hyped, not just a pandemic of false positives, but people have to be poisoned and deprived, in order for these viruses to become threats to at least some of us."
- Yes, Covid was a spectacularly weak virus compared to previous Pandemic viruses. That's why I call it a pseudopandemic, it doesn't have anywhere near the lethality to justify the term "Pandemic".
There is no doubt they massively exaggerated the kill rate with the nonsensical "died with Covid" after a positive PCR test within x days. They REALLY got the party started by moving elderly Covid patients into old people's homes.
In my opinion, this is just further evidence of premeditation and psyoping people.
"The pandemic pattern is quite weird, where we have cities that are hard-hit, but neighboring cities with strong travel and economic connections are only mildly affected"
Again I come back to the quasispecies swarm aspect. It seems that only 10-15% of the population is susceptible to any given variant. "Scientists don't know why this is" but I bet it can be explained by the quasispecies swarm phenomena.
"The quasispecies swarm model approaches RNA viruses not as discrete genotypes transmitted on by discrete strains, but instead as quasispecies of mutant swarms of virions which carry distinct but complimentary sets of alleles – collections of genes thought to work together – which work in concert in real-time to establish and expand infections. One of the first empirical changes that comes once you consider an RNA virus as a quasispecies is that at any point in time an average of all the extant variants’ genomes serves as the smallest selective unit, as opposed to using individual virions or any single extant genome in a population, the classical approach.
This quasispecies viral swarming is an amorphous behavior that describes the search for fitness that occurs as each successive generation of the swarm produces another spectra of mutations, with the term “quasispecies” specifically describing “distributions of non-identical but related genomes subjected to a continuous process of genetic variation, competition, and selection, and which act as a unit of selection.”
Each of these distributions can be considered clouds of allelic statistical possibilities, each of which represents the spectrum of mutations that can be expected to emerge within a set number of generations, so their ratios will be constantly changing over successive generations and in different environmental settings.
This type of effect has just begun to be explored within the classical model, by quantifying the antigenic waves that shimmer across the surface of quasispecies mutant swarms as they shift between the host populations, and using these measurements to indirectly measure the quasispecies swarm itself without really getting the full picture of what’s really going on.
With quasispecies viruses replicating continually once a successful infection has set in and begun to smolder, the most-fit variant for a given tissue will predominate in that one tissue when a sample is taken only from it. However, although only one variant will appear in the smoky quasispecies mutant swarm infecting the tissue, the smoldering infection will be continually throwing off new variants which represent different points in the possible mutational spectrum – some of which will be better adapted to neighboring tissue, and others acting as accelerants for the predominate variant, intensifying its virulence."
https://harvard2thebighouse.substack.com/p/a-grin-without-a-cat
The only analogy I have for this is backtesting/optimizing trading systems. You use genetic backtesting and optimization which selects for "fitness" of variations of a given strategy. It often takes several hours to backtest a strategy with many parameters to find the one with the best fitness. The fitness is another variable - percentage profitability, drawdown, average trade duration, profit factor, etc.
So the idea is, within the swarm, it takes time to develop parameters such as infectivity, virulence, range of symptoms, etc. Because this takes time, it has the effect of not infecting everyone immediately. By the time it infects a certain subset of the population, it has evolved again to create a new strain that has to start the process again.
To calculate how this works in reality would take a supercomputer. It may even be impossible. It's evolutionary biology at its finest.
It's a crap analogy because most people won't know what I'm talking about, but it's the best I've got. 😀
Hey Rich. I know we disagree on this issue but I do agree with the basic premise. Covid is only dangerous to people who are very ill or very old. The average age of a Covid death is older than the average life expectancy.
The whole thing was a massive scam that was designed to get people to take an extremely dangerous "vaccine" they didn't need. It's not just Johnson, it's politicians all over the world. Their actions show that they aren't frightened of the virus as they break their own policies and rules.
It was and remains an IQ test.
The problem with Geert is that he is writing for an audience that isn't us. He's writing for his peers, in the hope that they wake up from their deluded trance. This is why he refuses to write what he clearly knows. He knows that mass-death is imminent - make no mistake about that, he hints at it all the time but will never say the quiet part loud. I read everything he writes and it's a mindfuck because he is all over the place. This is also why he appears to contradict himself in his own articles. It's very difficult to say what you mean without saying what you mean.
He also knows many of his peers are multi-vaxxed, and that if he starts going "full realist" then he will scare those peers to death.
In essence, what he is trying to do is put an arm around someone and give them a "come to Jesus moment", as the Yanks say. In reality, sometimes you need to scream in someone's face that they are morons and need to wake up.
I agree, SARS-COV-2 is not a real virus. It's a Frankenstein's Monster. I totally get why people don't think Covid exists because it's such a huge scam (e.g. I think 17,000 people have died OF Covid in the UK in two and a half years, a bad flu season in the UK can kill four times that many people in a few months). But if we say that the "virus" doesn't exist then we are letting the criminals who perpetrated this off the hook. We have the receipts. We know they did the GoF research and we know that the fruits of their labour were the vaxxes - which I continue to contend were the whole point.
Quasispecies Swarm theory should be an olive branch to terrain theorists because it fits with a lot of what they are saying. Ironically, viruses need their own "terrain" to be able to do what they do. Looking at it through the lens of genetic algorithm backtesting and optimization makes perfect sense. Selecting for "fitness" as it moves through a population, until it finally manages to become "fit" enough to do what it does. I totally see how that works.
I don't pretend to have all the answers but I got the coof and it was completely unlike any illness I have ever had before. Fortunately it was a nothing burger that lasted for five hours, but the brain fog was something I have only ever experienced when I was a small child trying to imagine an infinite universe. My brain temporarily stopped working for a while. It was very strange.
Cheers Rich. I have no time for Foucault and his BS. I create trading systems for markets like Forex, CFDs, Futures etc so backtesting and optimization is extremely important. What you are effectively doing is creating a "swarm" of variables and using a form of evolutionary biology (genetic algorithms) to compute the best variables you are selecting for. It sounds complicated but it's actually very easy to understand and do.
Respectfully, to both camps.... What does whether viruses exist or not matter in regards to the depopulation scheme?
it serves to keep us fighting each other and not focus on the ball ...
I get this take on the debate, but if we are fighting, we are doing it to ourselves, virus theory is a house of cards built on a plate of jelly. Its vital that contagion with a pure isolate
is proven once and for all, but they can't.
look at this monkey pox story New York post ....
https://nypost.com/2022/05/28/monkeypox-simulation-in-2021-predicted-current-outbreak/
Very, very interesting.
I kinda like science, but I'm layman. This kinda blows me away. I do remember Canadian man months ago asking for sample...
They couldn't provide. Worldwide news, in our circles.
I'm out of my league. God bless both sides. Truth will win.
I will keep up, A bit....
The sub question is... Have they isolated covid 19....
So before virus issue... I think this is probably easier for either side to win. And with more rewards. That, as a layman.
That won’t stop them.
How long do you think it will take to convince most of the world? How are you goi g to do it?
I’m not a we so far.
Detection of SARS-CoV-2 in fecal samples goes back to 2020 Spain and Milan Italy, where it had shown up in sewage.
We also know SARS-CoV-2 exists because those of us who had COVID naturally show antibodies to both the spike protein and the nucleocapsid protein, whereas one of the many problems of the vaccinated is they only make antibodies to the now long gone Wuhan spike protein, but not the nucleocapsid protein of the virus.
The bottom line is as you said, it is an utter waste of time to argue about presence or absence of a virus. PSYOP-19 is about a lot of horrible things: genocide, tyranny, grand larceny of the already mega-rich against everyone else. But it was not at all about a virus.
I was talking about being a teacher and not getting sick from kids’ colds in a Substack and was told by a person that I couldn’t catch anything from my kids. That’s when I got my first no germ theory information.
Somewhere along the way, that person or another told me that new info was coming out about rabies and that it wasn’t a virus. My reply was that I’d take the rabies vaccine, but they didn’t have to if they didn’t want to. I got no reply to that, but it doesn’t matter. I’m taking that vax if I need it because I’m pretty sure something in the saliva of a rabid animal is contagious. I guess not taking the rabies vax if needed is ultimate way to prove your beliefs.
I’m just about ready to throw up my hands and just stop caring about any of this at all because all the virus/no virus, on top of all the other stuff, is wearing me out. Maybe that’s the whole point, though.
I hope people are not so foolish as to not take it, but I notice when people say vaccines don’t work and they’ll never take another, they forgot about this one. I also don’t really trust other vaccines right now because of the C vaccine and all I’ve leaned about vaccines and big pharma. It’s also hard to trust medical professionals now, too. (I never trusted the government.)
I don’t know if I was harmed by vaccines or if I harmed my child by getting her vaxxed or even if vaccines did any good at all. I just know that I’ll be eager to take the rabies vax if necessary.
Here’s a not so fun fact: a handful of people have gotten rabies from cornea transplants.
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/8776570/
Also kidney transplants:
https://www2c.cdc.gov/podcasts/media/pdf/Rabies%20in%20Transplant%20Recipients.pdf
If they are using PCR to detect SARS-CoV-2, they are only detecting fragments of what they purport the genome is (2 or 3 genes). Is there any evidence that they have detected a full intact particle of SARS-CoV-2?
As for being an utter waste of time, if there are no viruses, a lot of issues will no longer be relevant. That is worth knowing the truth.
PCR is utterly bogus as a test for infectious diseases. Its inventor, the late Kary Mullis, warned of that, when he saw that this manufacturing technique was being misused. I wrote about that here:
https://pdmj.org/papers/is_there_a_pandemic
If people waste time trying to prove or disprove existence of a virus, enormous undertakings to try to establish exhaustive proof one way or the other of that - which was utterly irrelevant to COVID tyranny rollout - then valuable time and energy will be wasted while our human rights are violated.
COVID is about tyranny, and how much a sheep-like populace will accept. That's it. That's the important topic.
Tyranny is an important topic. The reason for the tyranny is also an important topic. It could be argued that if they didn't use health as a reason they could use something else. True, but health is something that affects everyone, that is why it is such an important topic. If infectious disease is accepted as not real, then they have lost one major money and control funnel. War is good for business. Disease and viruses are good for business.
If they lose viruses as an enemy they have far less to work with in terms of terrorizing every single individual. The could move on to money or food but that threatens survival and is likely impossible to keep a lid on. Tests, masks, lockdowns and quackcination can all continue or at least be attempted as long as they have the enemy of a virus to fight.
I do see your point, and should have clarified that I do, which I believe is:
If viruses don't exist, then the entire pretext of the current tyranny crumbles to dust.
However, my points are:
1) Proving that viruses either definitely do or don't exist is exhausting labor, a huge distraction, and may be impossible, even with state of the art microscopy, and more importantly:
2) It didn't have to be viruses that served as a pretext for tyranny. It could have been contact with allegedly poisonous cockroach exoskeleton, or the barbs on the back of cricket legs, or antbites, or sunlight, or inhaling nitrogen, (80% of air) or anything that could be weaponized to the point of mass formation, to get the sheep running trembling into lockdown and self-suffocation.
And nobody denies that roaches, crickets, ants, nitrogen or sunlight exist.
1) I don't see why it is exhausting. If they have the tech to make an mRNA strand and put it in a quackcine, I don't understand how they can not detect such as well.
2) I don't think using insects or sunlight will work anywhere near as well as proposing contagious disease. The data already shows there is no pandemic, it will be very hard to sell a story based on insects, nitrogen or sunlight.
The viruses are contagious story must be discarded or we will just keep getting more of things like this: https://www.nbcnewyork.com/news/local/hundreds-may-be-infected-with-polio-virus-nys-top-doctor-says-urging-vaccinations/3811499/
Okay, but antibiotic-resistant bacteria can be as easily blamed as a virus. Cholera wiped out NYC in the 1840's, far more devastating than any virus. Scarlet fever, bubonic plague were also far more devastating than any virus. All bacterial. Must we also deny the existence of bacteria?
You say people will not be fooled by sunlight or nitrogen or insect proteins, but a nothing burger virus, SARS-CoV-2, with a 99.85% survival rate (IFR = 0.015%, had the.idiots all masking up and ducking under their furniture. So any scam could fool them.
I respect your viewpoint by the way, just disagreeing.
Exactly. Viruses are way more likely to exist than not. It's practically indisputable. As I've said many times to virus deniers, explain why measles rash looks very different from shingles rash, looks very different than mumps. They have no answer, except, 'Well, that must be some pollutant,' but they never name the specific pollutants.
Sure, it would be convenient for all COVID -related tyranny to miraculously disappear if you could prove viruses don't exist. But, for better or worse, that contradicts reality. The tyranny itself is the problem, NOT this very easily defeated viral infection.
Internal bickering doesn't help our cause, I think it's better to call a virus as a gene fragment or peptide or a toxic gene fragment. Therefore spike proteins, venom proteins and you name it, are all under the classification of really small things considered as bioweapons. The one error I think the non virus people make is assuming the method of transmission must be from mucous or lung fluid. Would it not be the breath, the air to be sampled? Or the microflora of the skin that the infected may be depositing on their environment?
Yes, correct
Agreed Marius, TY
that clip takes yeadon out of context. what he said was "respiratory viruses don't exist as i understood them." dr. kevin stilllwagon does the best takedown of the false dichotomy of pathogen-vs-terrain "theory," neither is a theory, both are real. https://drkevinstillwagon.substack.com/p/the-silent-killers-e33
think it's time we parked the exploding pinto and fired up the atv
Right; they're not mutually exclusive. Why can't people see this?
because "viruses don't exist" is an op maybe?
ka-ching
I definitely heard Dr. Yeadon say that he doesn't think SARS-COV-2 exists anymore though.
I'll have to trawl my links but it was recent and it was quite shocking to me.
ny- yes assuming that both Terrain and Germ are valid, and then move on solves the problem. As your link reinforces, being healthy comes down to promoting a strong Terrain, but in a pinch some strong medicine like garlic etc helps the body buy some time to get a stronger terrain.
I never took a flu shot because the first patient in hospital I ever "took care of"
(still under the tutelage of my unit educator) was a late 30's women with,
"Guillain–Barré syndrome is a rapid-onset muscle weakness caused by the immune system damaging the peripheral nervous system." This was post a basic flu shot, (1981) and her suffering and the
damage were profound. That scared the heck out of me, and never wanting any medications
anyway, I never considered a flu shot ever. I believe there are covid viruses and I am aware of
the common cold spreading mostly by little kids in school environments because sneezes and
secretions are available for uptake by one and all. They are "building their immune systems"
so to speak. The parents "catch" the bug and bring it to work and spread it to their contacts.
Virus start as particles entering the cells, and using RNA develop into spider-like forms and
kill the cell, bursting out and back into particles, moving on to enter other cells. We used to
say, (it was a common saying) that the person discovering a cure for the common cold would
be a millionaire. Maybe I am full of beans, but that was what I learned in my chemistry, organic
chemistry, and microbiology college classes. Older people will recognize "clepping out"
of required courses by taking a test and getting it right and getting the college credit for
the effort. I clepped out of 2 courses/ Biology and Basic English.
https://duckduckgo.com/?t=ffab&q=clepping+out+collge+credit+for+passing+a+test&atb=v198-1&ia=web
https://clep.collegeboard.org
Further statement by Dr. Yeadon:
While that ("there are no respiratory viruses") is exactly what I said, I encourage people to focus on the most important conclusion I have drawn. Nobody should care what I think about the General category “respiratory viruses”. At least, I don’t think they should.
I do however think people should consider the evidence for & against the existence specifically of SARS-CoV-2 as described by the same people & organisations who have literally done nothing but lie to us for over 2.5 years.
The evidence is starkly against it being the cause of massed illness and deaths.
If I’m reading the evidence correctly, the implications of course are profound: there’s no pandemic & everything installed in its name can & should be swept away overnight, and normal life resumed to the extent possible.
So please, set aside the general argument & focus instead only on the specific (SARS-CoV-2). Otherwise the propagandists will exploit our prior general beliefs & thereby maintain the illusion of a pandemic. There is no pandemic.
Best wishes
Mike
https://t.me/robinmg/22116
I have been writing on this substack for quite some time that there was never a pandemic as per global death rates and nation's YoY.
I always refer to the pandemic as "pandemic".
It makes me wonder for sure!
I never fell for the PsyOP due to my good doctor friend who, in January 2020, recommended daily doses of Vitamins D & C, zinc and green tea (the enzyme allows zinc to enter the cell and do its work). I've had never a sniffle since.
https://cmnnews.org/?utm_campaign=paper_sub&utm_medium=email&utm_source=subscription
I'm currently reading Dr. Mary's Monkey and this is a rabbit hole of a story. Definitely worth looking into with the whole monkey business of today 🙊
If you don't like reading here is a link to a podcast from about 5 years ago.
Truth is definitely stranger than fiction!
https://youtu.be/SwMF6160yOY
Let´s keep it simple: For Covid: If there is a virus in my throat than you take saliva and you will find it under a microscope. If you don´t have a microscope which can see it, take the saliva and infect some other person with it. Show me! Let´s move on to AIDS: If there is a virus, you may take a blood samlple, saliva or any other body fluid and see it under the microscope. You take the sample and infect somebody with it. Was this ever shown? NO. If you were diasgnosed with HIV, they gave you ACT and told you, you have to take it for the rest of your life. ACT is killing everybody. It is a strong poison that creates all the symptoms they than call AIDS. These White Coats are killing us! It starts with the first antibiotic you take. The antibiotic has strong effects on the body which are later on considered an illness, and they give you more chemicals to supress the symptom, which causes more havoc in your body, more symptoms, more chemicals, more symptoms and on and on. Same with high blood pressure: You have to take a chemical to supress this symptom and it sets you on the road to a slow death. Why do you think people in their 60th ending up taking 6 or more medications every day? Because the White Coats healed you? NO. They are making you a life long customer to the Pharma industrie. Stop believing in the Rockefeller medical system!
You can believe in whatever cult you like, no problem. I live since more than 30 years without this so called medical system and I am happy and healthy with it.
That’s almost certainly a deepfake or otherwise manipulated video of Yeadon. I don’t believe he doubts the existence of respiratory viruses.
Who is the world's 1st smartest guy?
To date no one has been smart enough to figure that out.
Touché
🤣
Me. Actually, I'm 7,276,386
My 18 year old son is the smartest guy I know in the world. Lol. I tell him all the time as he helps his momma with lots of things and I don’t know what I would do without him. Lol. : )
This substack writer is definitely the second smartest guy in the world though!!!! He’s my imaginary other son. Lol.
You know.... what’s his real name? I never looked. Lol.
Great writing and articles. So clever!! So refreshing. Love this stack. : )
i'd suggest Da Vinci
i dont think anyone has got any where close to him since
Kary Mullis before he got dead
Oh WOW! Yeadon has changed his tune. I distinctly recall him declaring, not so long ago, on his Telegram channel, that he absolutely could not agree with those who say viruses do not exist; I would love to hear him talk about this as it must have taken some very compelling evidence to change the mind of an expert in respiratory medicine to now deny the existence of viruses.
If I understand it properly, the ‘terrain argument’ is that these violations of our civil liberties are being permitted due to the contagion concept, but if we eliminate contagion, we eliminate that permission. I would instead say, TPTB will always find a reason to violate historical civil liberties in favour of ‘collectivism’, contagion or no contagion, and our resistance to this must rely on bedrock principles deeper than that. Our freedoms can only be constrained when our actions directly and demonstratively place others in danger, a traditional understanding of western Christian societies, which grew out of common law, and the reformed faith...one reason ‘asymptomatic spread’ and ‘healthy quarantine’ are EVIL, as they provide an excuse for these ongoing State violations of liberty. (Hello Trudeau et al) Meanwhile the vast majority of churches go along with this still...and call it ‘love for neighbour’. I can’t even....Rant over. Goodnight.
when this substack was just starting out:
https://2ndsmartestguyintheworld.substack.com/p/miasma-theory-vs-germ-theory
I read it. Very good. One must differentiate between antibiotics (they work against
bacterial infection and do save lives) and vaccinations. I have come to the (easy)
conclusion that vaccines do far more harm than good. I think vax are BS.
Exceptions? I can't think of any. Surely, everyone understands the terrain is
paramount.
Take Haiti as an example...billions given and still no water for the people.
Clean water. The south had the damage but $$$$ went to the north. Projects
included roads, hotels, hospital facilities, docks for medical ships and security for
same. Rumor has it the place was a hot bed for organ harvest/organ surgeries,
and kids getting stolen and trafficked into God only knows what situation.
Rumors?
Rabies?
Thanks, good read. Hasn’t seen that, but having read some of the ‘ant-vaxxer🤪tomes...I’m still on the fence about the risk/reward. Maybe I haven’t read enough. Have you checked out El Gato’s recent stack on this issue? Interesting for sure...one thing I do know...they will have to shoot me first if they want to jab me!
"So the challenge is impossible to satisfy. They either don't know how sequencing works or they want to discredit virology. As Dr. Yeadon argued other pathogens can cause illness. The problem with that notion is why do you find the pathogenic spike protein sequence and more importantly the unique Furin cleavage site only on SARsCOV2 positive patients?"
This answer is pathetic. You don't do genetic sequencing to isolate a virus. It's a very simple process Cowan et al have defined. You do NOT add any chemicals, toxins, or monkey kidney cells to the sample from which you are going to isolate the virus. They do this every time. Then when they starve the cells of nutrients and observe cell death they say it is caused by a virus! They never simply separate out the virus particle itself from a pure sample and then PROVE it causes disease. Robert Koch defined how to do it. And you cannot detect a virus using PCR. It is absurd to claim you can. The virus has to be shown to exist in nature. This has never been done for HIV, The measles, Polio, SARS-CoV2 or any of these so-called viruses. Look up the Bardens vs Lanka case where the German authorities were forced to admit there is no evidence for the existence of the measles virus.