Okay, but can you reach out to Todd and let him know that the DMED was fake and that the 1100% number from DMED was incorrect on three accounts (1) first occurrence vs. all occurrence query comparison, (2) there really was a glitch, and (3*) the 2016-2020 numbers were almost certainly all faked, meaning there is no denominator to compute…
Okay, but can you reach out to Todd and let him know that the DMED was fake and that the 1100% number from DMED was incorrect on three accounts (1) first occurrence vs. all occurrence query comparison, (2) there really was a glitch, and (3*) the 2016-2020 numbers were almost certainly all faked, meaning there is no denominator to compute from.
But most importantly, once he lets me walk him through (3*), he has a nuclear warhead in his arsenal.
Okay, but can you reach out to Todd and let him know that the DMED was fake and that the 1100% number from DMED was incorrect on three accounts (1) first occurrence vs. all occurrence query comparison, (2) there really was a glitch, and (3*) the 2016-2020 numbers were almost certainly all faked, meaning there is no denominator to compute from.
But most importantly, once he lets me walk him through (3*), he has a nuclear warhead in his arsenal.
https://roundingtheearth.substack.com/p/defining-away-vaccine-safety-signals-55a?s=w
If you explain your 3 here and it makes good sense, I will FW to Todd.
Thanks.
Look at the charts on my link. The snapshots of the prior years published online suddenly changed mid 2021 in the May MSMR.
You just have to visually see it. It's irrefutable.
Thank you for addressing this Mathew. 🙏
I was thinking you are exactly the right person to look at this mess. Thank you.