@Lex if you are diagnosed with prostate cancer, and then learn that feminists in Congress made sure that breast cancer gets many times more funding than prostate cancer, we can then discuss the fallacy of relative privation in more detail.
@Lex if you are diagnosed with prostate cancer, and then learn that feminists in Congress made sure that breast cancer gets many times more funding than prostate cancer, we can then discuss the fallacy of relative privation in more detail.
I fail to see the connection. Funding might be a zero-sum game, but writing is not. A woman sharing her concern about sex with vaxxed men in no way diminishes your ability to share your concern about sex with vaxxed women.
@Lex, men that articulate their concerns over women are shunned, and not published. This author only needed to say that the situation works in both directions, but she did not do that. Stating that the coin has two sides shows journalistic and personal honesty and integrity. Sadly, those attributes are often lacking in feminists.
@Lex, the connection between this writer's feminist assault on men, and the assault on male health issues by feminists in Congress, carries a common theme: women are important, and men are not.
@Cairn, excellent point. In my own (limited) experience, women take rejection VERY badly. Although many are humane about it, and say, "I don't know how you guys deal with rejection". (Those women are among the growing number of unicorns).
@Lex if you are diagnosed with prostate cancer, and then learn that feminists in Congress made sure that breast cancer gets many times more funding than prostate cancer, we can then discuss the fallacy of relative privation in more detail.
Amen Frank Amen
I fail to see the connection. Funding might be a zero-sum game, but writing is not. A woman sharing her concern about sex with vaxxed men in no way diminishes your ability to share your concern about sex with vaxxed women.
@Lex, men that articulate their concerns over women are shunned, and not published. This author only needed to say that the situation works in both directions, but she did not do that. Stating that the coin has two sides shows journalistic and personal honesty and integrity. Sadly, those attributes are often lacking in feminists.
@Lex, the connection between this writer's feminist assault on men, and the assault on male health issues by feminists in Congress, carries a common theme: women are important, and men are not.
And the author says that the men take rejection badly. As if women do not. Yeah, sure.
@Cairn, excellent point. In my own (limited) experience, women take rejection VERY badly. Although many are humane about it, and say, "I don't know how you guys deal with rejection". (Those women are among the growing number of unicorns).