I think there is some wisdom in this, I also think they could get together and share information. It does not need to be a "debate" more of a discussion. I think if Steve saw the evidence that Dr. David Martin has, he would take it in and processes it. I think it would make him an even stronger advocate against the bio-weapon shots.
I think there is some wisdom in this, I also think they could get together and share information. It does not need to be a "debate" more of a discussion. I think if Steve saw the evidence that Dr. David Martin has, he would take it in and processes it. I think it would make him an even stronger advocate against the bio-weapon shots.
Either way, Kirsch is throwing a much wider net to bring in new recruits to fight this battle. It makes no sense whatsoever to reduce the awakening entry point.
I agree mostly. I have followed Steve as he woke up, the entire journey. I was a few months ahead of him in that process. But not with his type of skills. I am more of a preponderance of the evidence guy these days.
In my view, he has a blind spot or two especially when it comes to accountability. I think Dr. David Martin could help fill much of that. But I also think that Steve would need some time to process it.
Dr. David Martin, when talking in his areas of expertise, is the smartest, most well researched and backed by evidence person I have ever heard speak. And I have heard many smart people speak.
I think we essentially agree on pretty much everything, The main point for me, is if they got together in a friendly way (not a debate) and shared information ... everybody wins and no one loses.
Well nobody is an overstatement :). Plus many of us share this stuff. However, the second sentence, is likely accurate :(, it does indeed seem that unless something is either reported sufficiently, or touches the majority of lives ... etc. :(
Hear hear! I think steve has demonstrated that he can adjust his thinking and just because David Martin understands more than any person on earth about the present situation a friendly sharing would be much more productive than betting
Actually the true spirit of Debate is what is needed in this and every other issue at hand. Facts presented for and against with no pressure in what the debate will provide fairly and openly. Nothing hidden and no fraud allowed.
That's a nice platitude, but, what is needed is an effective strategy. Kirsch building numbers of converts, and Martin cementing the case against these tyrants is an effective strategy at this time.
Be very careful with your boy Dr. David Martin. He's got the eye of Osiris tattoed on his body, and he has a long career working with globalist institutions, and a web-site covered with masonic symbols. I would strongly suggest that you need independent confirmation for anything he says.
I think there is some wisdom in this, I also think they could get together and share information. It does not need to be a "debate" more of a discussion. I think if Steve saw the evidence that Dr. David Martin has, he would take it in and processes it. I think it would make him an even stronger advocate against the bio-weapon shots.
Either way, Kirsch is throwing a much wider net to bring in new recruits to fight this battle. It makes no sense whatsoever to reduce the awakening entry point.
I agree mostly. I have followed Steve as he woke up, the entire journey. I was a few months ahead of him in that process. But not with his type of skills. I am more of a preponderance of the evidence guy these days.
In my view, he has a blind spot or two especially when it comes to accountability. I think Dr. David Martin could help fill much of that. But I also think that Steve would need some time to process it.
Dr. David Martin, when talking in his areas of expertise, is the smartest, most well researched and backed by evidence person I have ever heard speak. And I have heard many smart people speak.
I think we essentially agree on pretty much everything, The main point for me, is if they got together in a friendly way (not a debate) and shared information ... everybody wins and no one loses.
I too, think we essentially agree on pretty much everything.
Dr D Martin represents the means to one day holding these genocidal maniacs to account for their grotesque deeds.
Steve Kirsch is a leader in ensuring there are sufficient converts to tip the scales to enable that to happen.
He will tip nothing ... nobody reads SS ... nobody reads him....
The only way this tips is if so many get injured or die that it cannot be ignored ...
Well nobody is an overstatement :). Plus many of us share this stuff. However, the second sentence, is likely accurate :(, it does indeed seem that unless something is either reported sufficiently, or touches the majority of lives ... etc. :(
The people that read ss and his ss world have to disagree
There are 8B people in the world... how many read Steve's SS as a percentage of 8B.
Essentially it's 0
Hear hear! I think steve has demonstrated that he can adjust his thinking and just because David Martin understands more than any person on earth about the present situation a friendly sharing would be much more productive than betting
nearly 6B are Rat Juiced... he is a drop in the ocean
Actually the true spirit of Debate is what is needed in this and every other issue at hand. Facts presented for and against with no pressure in what the debate will provide fairly and openly. Nothing hidden and no fraud allowed.
That's a nice platitude, but, what is needed is an effective strategy. Kirsch building numbers of converts, and Martin cementing the case against these tyrants is an effective strategy at this time.
Be very careful with your boy Dr. David Martin. He's got the eye of Osiris tattoed on his body, and he has a long career working with globalist institutions, and a web-site covered with masonic symbols. I would strongly suggest that you need independent confirmation for anything he says.