Steve has been shouting from the rooftops that these experimental injections are killing people, and continue to kill, weeks and months after receiving them. That's the most important message to get out to the public. What difference does it make whether the killing is due to greed and speed of development or whether they were designed…
Steve has been shouting from the rooftops that these experimental injections are killing people, and continue to kill, weeks and months after receiving them. That's the most important message to get out to the public. What difference does it make whether the killing is due to greed and speed of development or whether they were designed to kill? Either way, the public needs to know that these injections are deadly. The problem with going all in on "they were deliberately designed to kill" is that that would be very difficult to prove AND--and this is important!--very difficult to convince the public that the shots were designed to kill people. It's hard enough convincing them that they are deadly, but if you throw "it's deliberate, the shots were DESIGNED to kill" into the mix, people respond with "crazy tinfoil conspiracy theorist" and walk away. I say let's stick to what can be clearly shown with the mountain of evidence that we have. Maybe it will come out that the design of the shots was to create a slow kill, but we can tackle that once the majority of the public finally opens their eyes to how deadly these shots really are.
I don’t think it’s difficult at all to show the vaxxines were designed to kill. But, you’re correct that is way too far out in front (at present) for the sheeple to contemplate.
Agreed. People can only absorb so much at once. If they saw the full nightmare they would not want to believe it regardless of evidence, it is too horrific and they would run away.
Steve has been shouting from the rooftops that these experimental injections are killing people, and continue to kill, weeks and months after receiving them. That's the most important message to get out to the public. What difference does it make whether the killing is due to greed and speed of development or whether they were designed to kill? Either way, the public needs to know that these injections are deadly. The problem with going all in on "they were deliberately designed to kill" is that that would be very difficult to prove AND--and this is important!--very difficult to convince the public that the shots were designed to kill people. It's hard enough convincing them that they are deadly, but if you throw "it's deliberate, the shots were DESIGNED to kill" into the mix, people respond with "crazy tinfoil conspiracy theorist" and walk away. I say let's stick to what can be clearly shown with the mountain of evidence that we have. Maybe it will come out that the design of the shots was to create a slow kill, but we can tackle that once the majority of the public finally opens their eyes to how deadly these shots really are.
I don’t think it’s difficult at all to show the vaxxines were designed to kill. But, you’re correct that is way too far out in front (at present) for the sheeple to contemplate.
Dead is dead.
exactly!
Agreed. People can only absorb so much at once. If they saw the full nightmare they would not want to believe it regardless of evidence, it is too horrific and they would run away.