3 Comments
User's avatar
⭠ Return to thread
Dr. David E. Martin's avatar

Following The Science...and going where Steve Kirsch didn't go with the FAA piece...

Following the Science, which clearly states ever since I was in graduate school that a PR interval on an ECG should be between 90 and 200msec (https://www.sciencedirect.com/.../biochemistr.../pr-interval), the FAA mysteriously has suggested that an additional 100msec (up to 300msec) is given to pilots before they should be considered for potential AV-block (https://www.faa.gov/.../exam_tech/item36/amd/arrhythmias/). This change was made in October of last year! https://www.faa.gov/.../ame/guide/media/Normal_Variants.pdf

Fly Safe and Effective!

Pseudouridine - an agent used in the stabilization of mRNA - has long been known to have a direct NEGATIVE impact on the myocardial tissue. (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7255589/ and its references). Ralph Baric knew this. Other mRNA engineers knew this. How do I know and why should the FAA and pilots' union care?

Because this was funded by NIH:

"This research was supported by the National Institute on Aging as well as the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute of the National Institutes of Health under grant numbers R21AG051914 (Principal Investigator, Tanika N. Kelly), 5R01AG041200-05 (Principal Investigator, Lydia A. Bazzano), and P20GM109036 (Principal Investigator, Jiang He)"

Expand full comment
2nd Smartest Guy in the World's avatar

Excellent points David.

Also, I just want to add here that legally these mRNA "vaccines" are not bioweapons proper since they do not have live attenuated or dead virions, but, rather, chemical weapons. This would be an important distinction if we do in fact have our debate with Steve. I use the term "bioweapon" because it has nicer ring to it.

Here's hoping Steve goes through with our debate -- it would benefit our movement tremendously.

Expand full comment