They don’t abide by the constitution, why would they recognize anything written by the powerful pen. You may be right, they may want a confrontation, but we are not being represented. The situation goes downhill everyday. The judiciary in this country, and in others is pathetic. The criminals are running rampant, while those who point that out, are being jailed.
It is harder in the US to be fair because your tax collectors are armed to the teeth.
The "government" have no authority over any man woman or child.
In the US the "Clearfield Doctrine" proves that fact.
They have just as much authority to tell you what to do as any other terrorist organisation such as Al Quaeda, ISIS or the WHO.
All courts where dissolved in 2008 under the clearfield doctrine then became registered companies on Dunn and Bradstreet company search. When governments enter the world of commerce, they are subject to the same burdens as any private firm or corporation U.S v Burr 309 U.S 22. See 22, U.S CA 286 e Bank of US v Planters Bank of Georgia 6L Ed (Wheat 244.) NOTE: Under the Clearfield Doctrine, the courts are no longer government entities in that they are demanding private monies and must have a contract with you to compel performance. They are no more special as a normal business than your local Jack In The Box. Clearfield Doctrine -“private commercial paper is used by corporate government, then government loses its sovereignty status and becomes no different than a mere private corporation” . Government create and enforce CIVIL LAWS known as statues, acts and legislation created by the Bar Association (set up by Rothschilds) which are duty bound to comply with the LAW of CONTRACTS. The Law of Contracts requires signed written agreements and complete transparency!
Governments Have Descended to the Level of Mere Private Corporations
Clearfield Doctrine Supreme Court Annotated Statute, Clearfield Trust Co. v. United States 318 U.S. 363- 371 1942 Whereas defined pursuant to Supreme Court Annotated Statute: Clearfield Trust Co. v. United States 318 U.S. 363-371 1942: "Governments descend to the level of a mere private corporation, and take on the characteristics of a mere private citizen . . . where private corporate commercial paper [Federal Reserve Notes] and securities [checks] is concerned . . . For purposes of suit, such corporations and individuals are regarded as entities entirely separate from government." What the Clearfield Doctrine is saying is that when private commercial paper is used by corporate government, then government loses its sovereignty status and becomes no different than a mere private corporation. As such, government then becomes bound by the rules and laws that govern private corporations which means that if they intend to compel an individual to some specific performance based upon its corporate statutes or corporation rules, then the government, like any private corporation, must be the holder-in-due-course of a contract or other commercial agreement between it and the one upon who demands for specific performance are made. And further, the government must be willing to enter the contract or commercial agreement into evidence before trying to get the court to enforce its demands, called statutes. This case is very important because it is a 1942 case that was decided after the UNITED STATES CORPORATION COMPANY filed its "CERTIFICATE OF INCORPORATION" in the State of Florida (July 15, 1925). And it was decided AFTER the 'corporate government' agreed to use the currency of the private corporation, the FEDERAL RESERVE. The private currency, the Federal Reserve Note, is still in use today. References: (i) Articles of Incorporation of UNITED STATES CORPORATION COMPANY http://anticorruptionsociety.files.wordpress.com/2014/01/articles-of-incorporation-of-u-scorp-company.pdf (ii) From The Great American Adventure by Judge Dale, retired. (pages 93-94) http://anticorruptionsociety.files.wordpress.com/2014/01/articles-of-incorporation-of-u-scorp-company.pdf [4] Corporations are not and can never be SOVEREIGN. They are not real, they are a fiction and only exist on paper. 5] Therefore, all laws created by these government corporations are private corporate regulations called public law, statutes, codes and ordinances to conceal their true nature. Do the Judge and your lawyer know about this? You bet they do! 6] Since these government bodies are not SOVEREIGN, they cannot promulgate or enforce CRIMINAL LAWS; they can only create and enforce CIVIL LAWS, which are duty bound to comply with the LAW of CONTRACTS. The Law of Contracts requires signed written agreements and complete transparency! Did you ever agree to be arrested and tried under any of their corporate statutes? For that matter, did you ever agree to contract with them by agreeing to be sued for violating their corporate regulations? [8] Enforcement of these corporate statutes by local, state and federal law enforcement officers are unlawful actions being committed against the SOVEREIGN public and these officers can be held personally liable for their actions. [Bond v. U.S., 529 US 334-2000]
As citizens of a common-law jurisdiction, we have the right to come together in our local communities and convene a common law court in full lawful legitimacy. We are capable of judging and sentencing any person, business or organization fairly regardless of the status they hold in society.
So who will hear their case? Who will listen to their argument, and decide whether they’ve been wronged or not? Mind you I’m not an attorney, but in order to present this argument you suggest, someone has to hear it.
If you are not prepared to work for it and fight like your life depends on it you will loose and possibly be killed.
This is war, they are trying to kill us. You can roll over and die or fight. Those are the only choices left.
With enough knowledge you can simply avoid ever appearing in front of any judge because their case will fall apart and you will sue them for thousands before any court case.
Okay I sue them. Do I get to decide whether I get a judgement or the corporation? I’m not willing to give up, but logically speaking neither are they. There has to be an unbiased party involved. Who would that be. I see it as we will be given no choice, but submit, or die trying to remain free.
You will have to dedicate yourself to learning about their corrupt legal system for at least a year preferably five years and then the solutions will become obvious, but that does take a long time and a lot of hard work.
I’ve heard it said (and I more or less agree) the “US is not a nation of laws and never has been. We are a nation of political will and always will be.”
So, until we have the political will to change things, it will be the same tomorrow as today.
Time to Exit the Matrix before it's too late.
The WHO have no power.
The government have no power.
The police have no power.
You have all the power.
Knowledge of this will set you free.
More details here; https://truthaddict.substack.com/p/how-to-destroy-the-matrix
Eventually resistance will take a physical form.
That is exactly what they want.
They have all the weapons and riots give them an excuse to pass even more draconian laws.
All you need to destroy the government is one single pen.
See here; https://truthaddict.substack.com/p/how-to-destroy-the-matrix
They don’t abide by the constitution, why would they recognize anything written by the powerful pen. You may be right, they may want a confrontation, but we are not being represented. The situation goes downhill everyday. The judiciary in this country, and in others is pathetic. The criminals are running rampant, while those who point that out, are being jailed.
It is harder in the US to be fair because your tax collectors are armed to the teeth.
The "government" have no authority over any man woman or child.
In the US the "Clearfield Doctrine" proves that fact.
They have just as much authority to tell you what to do as any other terrorist organisation such as Al Quaeda, ISIS or the WHO.
All courts where dissolved in 2008 under the clearfield doctrine then became registered companies on Dunn and Bradstreet company search. When governments enter the world of commerce, they are subject to the same burdens as any private firm or corporation U.S v Burr 309 U.S 22. See 22, U.S CA 286 e Bank of US v Planters Bank of Georgia 6L Ed (Wheat 244.) NOTE: Under the Clearfield Doctrine, the courts are no longer government entities in that they are demanding private monies and must have a contract with you to compel performance. They are no more special as a normal business than your local Jack In The Box. Clearfield Doctrine -“private commercial paper is used by corporate government, then government loses its sovereignty status and becomes no different than a mere private corporation” . Government create and enforce CIVIL LAWS known as statues, acts and legislation created by the Bar Association (set up by Rothschilds) which are duty bound to comply with the LAW of CONTRACTS. The Law of Contracts requires signed written agreements and complete transparency!
Governments Have Descended to the Level of Mere Private Corporations
Clearfield Doctrine Supreme Court Annotated Statute, Clearfield Trust Co. v. United States 318 U.S. 363- 371 1942 Whereas defined pursuant to Supreme Court Annotated Statute: Clearfield Trust Co. v. United States 318 U.S. 363-371 1942: "Governments descend to the level of a mere private corporation, and take on the characteristics of a mere private citizen . . . where private corporate commercial paper [Federal Reserve Notes] and securities [checks] is concerned . . . For purposes of suit, such corporations and individuals are regarded as entities entirely separate from government." What the Clearfield Doctrine is saying is that when private commercial paper is used by corporate government, then government loses its sovereignty status and becomes no different than a mere private corporation. As such, government then becomes bound by the rules and laws that govern private corporations which means that if they intend to compel an individual to some specific performance based upon its corporate statutes or corporation rules, then the government, like any private corporation, must be the holder-in-due-course of a contract or other commercial agreement between it and the one upon who demands for specific performance are made. And further, the government must be willing to enter the contract or commercial agreement into evidence before trying to get the court to enforce its demands, called statutes. This case is very important because it is a 1942 case that was decided after the UNITED STATES CORPORATION COMPANY filed its "CERTIFICATE OF INCORPORATION" in the State of Florida (July 15, 1925). And it was decided AFTER the 'corporate government' agreed to use the currency of the private corporation, the FEDERAL RESERVE. The private currency, the Federal Reserve Note, is still in use today. References: (i) Articles of Incorporation of UNITED STATES CORPORATION COMPANY http://anticorruptionsociety.files.wordpress.com/2014/01/articles-of-incorporation-of-u-scorp-company.pdf (ii) From The Great American Adventure by Judge Dale, retired. (pages 93-94) http://anticorruptionsociety.files.wordpress.com/2014/01/articles-of-incorporation-of-u-scorp-company.pdf [4] Corporations are not and can never be SOVEREIGN. They are not real, they are a fiction and only exist on paper. 5] Therefore, all laws created by these government corporations are private corporate regulations called public law, statutes, codes and ordinances to conceal their true nature. Do the Judge and your lawyer know about this? You bet they do! 6] Since these government bodies are not SOVEREIGN, they cannot promulgate or enforce CRIMINAL LAWS; they can only create and enforce CIVIL LAWS, which are duty bound to comply with the LAW of CONTRACTS. The Law of Contracts requires signed written agreements and complete transparency! Did you ever agree to be arrested and tried under any of their corporate statutes? For that matter, did you ever agree to contract with them by agreeing to be sued for violating their corporate regulations? [8] Enforcement of these corporate statutes by local, state and federal law enforcement officers are unlawful actions being committed against the SOVEREIGN public and these officers can be held personally liable for their actions. [Bond v. U.S., 529 US 334-2000]
So name me any attorney who’s going anywhere with this argument.
It's no good waiting for someone else. We're going to have to do it ourselves.
"Common Law Community Training Manual: Establishing the Reign of Natural Liberty: the Common Law and Its Courts":
https://www.goodreads.com/book/show/21486383-common-law-community-training-manual?ref=nav_sb_ss_1_21
As citizens of a common-law jurisdiction, we have the right to come together in our local communities and convene a common law court in full lawful legitimacy. We are capable of judging and sentencing any person, business or organization fairly regardless of the status they hold in society.
You will need to read my longer articles for more information.
https://truthaddict.substack.com/p/how-to-exit-the-matrix
https://truthaddict.substack.com/p/how-to-destroy-the-matrix
In the US some people are managing it by being their own attorneys, as all the judiciary are useless and corrupt.
“, as all the judiciary are useless and corrupt”
So who will hear their case? Who will listen to their argument, and decide whether they’ve been wronged or not? Mind you I’m not an attorney, but in order to present this argument you suggest, someone has to hear it.
You might as well just give up.
Nothing worth having in this world is easy.
If you are not prepared to work for it and fight like your life depends on it you will loose and possibly be killed.
This is war, they are trying to kill us. You can roll over and die or fight. Those are the only choices left.
With enough knowledge you can simply avoid ever appearing in front of any judge because their case will fall apart and you will sue them for thousands before any court case.
Okay I sue them. Do I get to decide whether I get a judgement or the corporation? I’m not willing to give up, but logically speaking neither are they. There has to be an unbiased party involved. Who would that be. I see it as we will be given no choice, but submit, or die trying to remain free.
Have you read my longer posts?
They explain a lot lot more.
You will have to dedicate yourself to learning about their corrupt legal system for at least a year preferably five years and then the solutions will become obvious, but that does take a long time and a lot of hard work.
I’ve heard it said (and I more or less agree) the “US is not a nation of laws and never has been. We are a nation of political will and always will be.”
So, until we have the political will to change things, it will be the same tomorrow as today.