And, here’s why this FactCheck itself is misleading:
Denmark link above:
“... The purpose of vaccination is not to prevent infection with covid-19, and people aged under 50 are therefore currently not being offered booster vaccination.”
--------------------
Not a lot of difference between “banned” and “not being offered”. Reuters trying to be slippery.
I was on Twitter, the land of Twats, and I was surprised everyone seemed ant vax now. I think the tide has turned and peeps are pissed. Really pissed. I mean, we are pure, but they probably are going to get sick or worse. I would be pissed.
Here’s the Denmark Link
https://www.sst.dk/en/english/corona-eng/vaccination-against-covid-19
--------------------
And here’s a misleading Reuters “Fact Check” on the subject:
Fact Check-Headline that claims Denmark has banned COVID-19 vaccines for children is misleading
https://www.reuters.com/article/factcheck-coronavirus-denmark/fact-check-headline-that-claims-denmark-has-banned-covid-19-vaccines-for-children-is-misleading-idUSL1N2ZS0J8
-----------------------------
And, here’s why this FactCheck itself is misleading:
Denmark link above:
“... The purpose of vaccination is not to prevent infection with covid-19, and people aged under 50 are therefore currently not being offered booster vaccination.”
--------------------
Not a lot of difference between “banned” and “not being offered”. Reuters trying to be slippery.
I think most people understand if you get fact checked, it is propaganda. You simply get checked when you are over the target
I was on Twitter, the land of Twats, and I was surprised everyone seemed ant vax now. I think the tide has turned and peeps are pissed. Really pissed. I mean, we are pure, but they probably are going to get sick or worse. I would be pissed.
Encouraging, and expected.