18 Comments

It's kind of like an old fashioned mob protection racket. Guy comes around and talks to store owner: "I noticed that big front window that you have was broken 3 times in the last month. What does it cost to replace those? 500? 600? What a friggin shame, 1,500 balloons a month. I'll tell you what I can do. I know some people. You give me 600 a month and I get it to them and they make sure you never have a broken window again. You end up saving 900 or more a month. What do you say? Let me help you out."

Similar to big pharma. "Why pay these ridiculous fines when you can spend less than half by donating to the right people?"

Expand full comment

2nd Smartest Guy, We see eye to eye on Pfizer! Please check out my latest cartoon: https://annecantstandit.substack.com/p/facelift?r=7f8gy&s=w&utm_campaign=post&utm_medium=web

Expand full comment

Thank you!

Expand full comment

This just illustrates the level of coordinated evil the world is dealing with. Where is the legacy media? This doctor can not have made these claims without proof, there’s no way.

Where is the legacy media with regards the myriad of whistleblowers that have come forth over the past year? Where was their coverage of all of doctors and scientists that have given expert opinions against pysop-19?

Oh wait, they are all owned by the same master that just so happens to own the pharma industry and US Congress.

Let’s face it, we are ruled by the best politicians money can buy.

Expand full comment

Astrozeneca paid 355 million to settle civil and criminal accusations about profiteering off cancer drug

http://www.nytimes.com/2003/06/21/business/21CANC.html

Expand full comment

This is how they make it seem like they are holding pharma accountable but usually don't: "Prosecutors said that they did not plan to charge any AstraZeneca employees for the illegal activities that they say began in 1991 and continued until last year. “The investigation did not discover any evidence to implicate AstraZeneca’s upper levels of management,” Mr. Andrews said."

Expand full comment

Pay close attention to who Dr A bashes and says should go to prison and who he exonerates with a wave of the hand and a "He should apologize but he should still be president" type of message. I love when people choose integrity but I have my questions about Dr A. I don't think he's evil but I do think he is playing. I am also familiar with how difficult it is to get funding for any kind of research, esp independent research that goes against the narrative. Research grants are all about politics. Which means if he is doing any consulting or research, someone is paying him fees or sponsoring him. The question is who? And why?

Expand full comment

excellent points.

Expand full comment

Why thank you :)

Have you heard of Marina Jacobi?

Expand full comment

Never heard of her.

Expand full comment

If you're bored and feeling weirdly metaphysically nerdy, highly recommend you check out her website. I only found her yesterday but I love her vibe and what she says makes sense except when it is over my head, in which case that only speaks of my own limitations. She has some unique thoughts on tech, the future, the geometry of the positive and negative, nano, consciousness and the art of letting go of the people who freely choose lower options but also with optimism about our future as humanity.

Expand full comment

Also look up griffisthin EBOLA HIV US patent

Expand full comment

This was being openly discussed in 2014 as a solution to these issues

Expand full comment

Up until fairly recently I would have said Monsanto. Unfortunately the category of “corrupt” or “corrupting influence” corporations is a densely populated field.

Expand full comment

“Pfizer offered me $1 million & $50,000 month wage"

Huh. RFK Jr said that Trump was given a million by Pfizer and then he stopped working with him.

This seems oddly specific.

Expand full comment

so, it's a "plata o plomo" type of situation?

coming up next -> plomo.

hey mf-ing asteriod, hurry the fuck up.

Expand full comment