It took me 42 minutes to read this in it’s entirety and just an old special ed teacher. It’s well worth every second and is in no way TLDR. Ethical Skeptic has no doubt spent hundreds of hours pulling all this together. We NEED to take the 42 minutes to read it, then send it to as many people as possible.
You are correct abt the CDC doing everything possible to obfuscate. One could make the argument that they are better at obfuscation than at shining light on truly informative data.
I'd argue with the assumption/statement that Covid is "six times more deadly" than the typical flu.
Per my research, this novel virus is not any more deadly than the typical flu for probably 99.9 percent of the people infected with this virus.
For example, 60 percent of the crew members of the USS Theodore Roosevelt and French Aircraft carrier The Charles deGaulle tested positive for Covid antibodies. 41 percent of the crew of the USS destroyer the USS Kidd tested positive via antibody tests or PCR tests. That's more than 4,200 sailors who had been previously infected, per these diagnostic assays. Of this number, only one crew member (allegedly) died from Covid. That's our real Infection Fatality Rate for Covid for the middle age and young adult cohorts. The flu IFR is 1-in-1000 deaths (0.1 percent). The Naval vessel IFR is 1-in-4,200.
The IFR for Covid for people I personally knew/know was approximately 1-in-800 infected people later dying. However, the Infection Fatality Rate (IFR) for people I personally know/knew who are under the age of 70 is 0.00000 percent. I don't know anyone under the age of 70 who died from Covid in the past four years.
It is hard to imagine a more stupid or more dangerous way of making decisions than by putting those decisions in the hands of people who pay no price for being wrong.
I have trouble parsing taht first graph. In what universe has the average birthweight of humans hovered around 1 gram? What are we measuring here, and what units are we using?
Was Covid really more deadly than the flu? How can you know from the data when two things happened for sure: 1) patients died from lack of treatment or improper treatment and 2) everything was labeled a covid death. Car crash? Covid. Cancer but positive Covid test? Covid.
So in spite of deaths “from” Covid, I remain skeptical with respect to how deadly it was. The data is too murky to make the claim that it was “more deadly than the flu”. I’m not buying it
Now certainly, the SARS-CoV-2 virus was a deadly pathogen, itself 6.6 times more deadly than the typical annual mortality total for all influenza viruses combined.
That first comment turned me off from the start. Even the CDC said at the beginning that Sars-Cov-2 survivability was over 97% in all age groups. Influenza survivability isn't that high.
Then you mentioned PCR testing. The creator of the PCR test before his death mentioned how it was being misused. They never created a standard. Spin enough cycles and you can find whatever you want. Just like know Pfizer has a vaccine for those over 60 of a childhood disease, RSV. How do they test for it? PCR testing of course to find a childhood disease in adults, so they can get that mRNA injection in them. Find a problem with PCR and create a solution with mRNA and make that money.
Agree with all that's been said about the tremendous work Ethical Skeptic has done with this analysis.
Maybe off topic, but does anyone know why the long-text V-safe fields have not been released? As I understood there was a court order to publish the first tranche around 17/02.
It took me 42 minutes to read this in it’s entirety and just an old special ed teacher. It’s well worth every second and is in no way TLDR. Ethical Skeptic has no doubt spent hundreds of hours pulling all this together. We NEED to take the 42 minutes to read it, then send it to as many people as possible.
Yes, and it is too long for me to thoroughly read in one sitting, but is exceedingly important. I try to digest and understand one section at a time.
Surely, the CDC and other agencies intentionally obfuscate. You have done much to make the proper conclusions clearer.
You are correct abt the CDC doing everything possible to obfuscate. One could make the argument that they are better at obfuscation than at shining light on truly informative data.
They need to be shut down.
They excel at concealing data and creating bogus data.
And never mind the UN/WHO characters’ agendas. How to stop this purposeful human genocide? Ideas? Thanks.
I agree KC, shut them down, they are a pawn of the globalist regime, and do no good for America.
This is TLDR for me, too....
But I skimmed enough to feel very confident in this data analysis. So,
THANK-YOU, THANK-YOU, THANK-YOU....Keep up the GOOD WORK, EVERYBODY....
The CDC knows exactly what's going on and is pleased by the results thus far.
https://www.youtube.com/live/eIsd3rEUrnQ
I'd argue with the assumption/statement that Covid is "six times more deadly" than the typical flu.
Per my research, this novel virus is not any more deadly than the typical flu for probably 99.9 percent of the people infected with this virus.
For example, 60 percent of the crew members of the USS Theodore Roosevelt and French Aircraft carrier The Charles deGaulle tested positive for Covid antibodies. 41 percent of the crew of the USS destroyer the USS Kidd tested positive via antibody tests or PCR tests. That's more than 4,200 sailors who had been previously infected, per these diagnostic assays. Of this number, only one crew member (allegedly) died from Covid. That's our real Infection Fatality Rate for Covid for the middle age and young adult cohorts. The flu IFR is 1-in-1000 deaths (0.1 percent). The Naval vessel IFR is 1-in-4,200.
https://billricejr.substack.com/p/the-covid-ifr-percentage-was-a-scandalous?utm_source=profile&utm_medium=reader2
The IFR for Covid for people I personally knew/know was approximately 1-in-800 infected people later dying. However, the Infection Fatality Rate (IFR) for people I personally know/knew who are under the age of 70 is 0.00000 percent. I don't know anyone under the age of 70 who died from Covid in the past four years.
Thanks for reposting Ethical Skeptic's work.
Invaluable.
It is hard to imagine a more stupid or more dangerous way of making decisions than by putting those decisions in the hands of people who pay no price for being wrong.
Thomas Sowell
I have trouble parsing taht first graph. In what universe has the average birthweight of humans hovered around 1 gram? What are we measuring here, and what units are we using?
Wow! Incredible amount of information. Thank you!
My TweetyBird Brain needs an Executive summary. 🙃 🤯
Bird Brain summary: the PTB obfuscate🤑 & kill ☠️ & maim. TY for verifying that.
Was Covid really more deadly than the flu? How can you know from the data when two things happened for sure: 1) patients died from lack of treatment or improper treatment and 2) everything was labeled a covid death. Car crash? Covid. Cancer but positive Covid test? Covid.
So in spite of deaths “from” Covid, I remain skeptical with respect to how deadly it was. The data is too murky to make the claim that it was “more deadly than the flu”. I’m not buying it
https://www.youtube.com/live/eIsd3rEUrnQ
Then this aspect of
TheCov.idDebaucle:
Now certainly, the SARS-CoV-2 virus was a deadly pathogen, itself 6.6 times more deadly than the typical annual mortality total for all influenza viruses combined.
That first comment turned me off from the start. Even the CDC said at the beginning that Sars-Cov-2 survivability was over 97% in all age groups. Influenza survivability isn't that high.
Then you mentioned PCR testing. The creator of the PCR test before his death mentioned how it was being misused. They never created a standard. Spin enough cycles and you can find whatever you want. Just like know Pfizer has a vaccine for those over 60 of a childhood disease, RSV. How do they test for it? PCR testing of course to find a childhood disease in adults, so they can get that mRNA injection in them. Find a problem with PCR and create a solution with mRNA and make that money.
Agree with all that's been said about the tremendous work Ethical Skeptic has done with this analysis.
Maybe off topic, but does anyone know why the long-text V-safe fields have not been released? As I understood there was a court order to publish the first tranche around 17/02.
Last interview please….thanks.
Thanks for the written info, John. Unfortunately, the audio on the rumble channel made it impossible for me to continue listening = garbled.